Anesthesia and patient safety: Have we reached our limits?

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 349-353

  Staender, Sven E A ^a   Mahajan, Ravi P ^b  

^a Regional Hospital   (Switzerland)

^b QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Complications; Medical errors; Risk management; Safety

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIA COMPLICATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INCIDENT REPORT; MEDICAL ERROR; MEDICATION ERROR; MORTALITY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ANESTHESIA; CHECKLIST; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW; MEDICATION ERRORS; PATIENTS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SAFETY; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79960106133     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: 14736500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344d90c     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, Smith AF. The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:592-597. The Helsinki Declaration is a unique initiative undertaken by major European organizations to set the tone and direction for improving and harmonizing standards of patient safety in Europe and worldwide. This article captures the background and the content of the declaration.
2. Story DA, Leslie K, Myles PS, et al. Complications and mortality in older surgical patients in Australia and New Zealand (the REASON study): A multicentre, prospective, observational study. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:1022-1030. This multicenter study is important as it showed that patient factors often had a stronger association with mortality than the type of surgery. Hence, the article points to the fact that strategies are needed to reduce complications and mortality in older surgical patients.
3. Auroy Y, Benhamou D, Pequignot F, et al. Mortality related to anaesthesia in France: Analysis of deaths related to airway complications. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:366-370.
4. Lagasse RS. Anesthesia safety: Model or myth? A review of the published literature and analysis of current original data. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:1609-1617. (Pubitemid 35417464)
5. Bothner U, Georgieff M, Schwilk B. Building a large-scale perioperative anaesthesia outcome-tracking database: Methodology, implementation, and experiences from one provider within the German quality project. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85:271-280. (Pubitemid 30601620)
6. Fasting S, Gisvold SE. Statistical process control methods allow the analysis and improvement of anesthesia care. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50:767-774. (Pubitemid 37455529)
7. Kheterpal S, O'Reilly M, Englesbe MJ, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of cardiac adverse events after general, vascular, and urological surgery. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:58-66. The study provides current evidence of continuing circumstances for anesthesiarelated morbidity, and hence room for further improvement.
8. Welch MB, Brummett CM, Welch TD, et al. Perioperative peripheral nerve injuries: A retrospective study of 380,680 cases during a 10-year period at a single institution. Anesthesiology 2009; 111:490-497.
9. Cheney FW, Posner KL, Lee LA, et al. Trends in anesthesia-related death and brain damage: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:1081-1086. (Pubitemid 44808571)
10. Lee LA, Posner KL, Domino KB, et al. Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:143-152. (Pubitemid 38833275)
11. Staender S, Schaer H, Clergue F, et al. A Swiss Anaesthesiology Closed Claims Analysis: Report of events in the years 1987-2008. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:85-91.
12. Szypula K, Ashpole KJ, Bogod D, et al. Litigation related to regional anaesthesia: An analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:443-452.
13. Davies JM, Posner KL, Lee LA, et al. Liability associated with obstetric anesthesia: A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:131-139. This article demonstrated the ongoing risk in obstetrics but with a trend to fewer major complications.
14. Cook TM, Bland L, Mihai R, Scott S. Litigation related to anaesthesia: An analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995-2007. Anaesthesia 2009; 64:706-718.
15. Lewis PJ, Dornan T, Taylor D, et al. Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: A systematic review. Drug Saf 2009; 32:379-389.
16. Catchpole K, Bell MD, Johnson S. Safety in anaesthesia: A study of 12,606 reported incidents from the UK National Reporting and Learning System. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:340-346. (Pubitemid 351365038)
17. Thomas AN, Panchagnula U. Medication-related patient safety incidents in critical care: A review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:726-733. (Pubitemid 351814235)
18. Webster CS, Merry AF, Larsson L, et al. The frequency and nature of drug administration error during anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001; 29:494-500. (Pubitemid 32970453)
19. Llewellyn RL, Gordon PC, Wheatcroft D, et al. Drug administration errors: A prospective survey from three South African teaching hospitals. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37:93-98.
20. Glavin RJ. Drug errors: Consequences, mechanisms, and avoidance. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:76-82.
21. Chang VY, Arora VM, Lev-Ari S, et al. Interns overestimate the effectiveness of their hand-off communication. Pediatrics 2010; 125:491-496. Communication psychologists suggest that miscommunication is caused by egocentric thought processes and a tendency for the speaker to overestimate the receiver's understanding. This study provides evidence that this type of miscommunication is common during handovers in clinical practice.
22. Nagpal K, Arora S, Abboudi M, et al. Postoperative handover: Problems, pitfalls, and prevention of error. Ann Surg 2010; 252:171-176.
23. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 1954; 51:327-358.
24. Runciman WB, Sellen A, Webb RK, et al. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Errors, incidents and accidents in anaesthetic practice. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993; 21:506-519. (Pubitemid 23311278)
25. Staender S, Davies J, Helmreich B, et al. The anaesthesia critical incident reporting system: An experience based database. Int J Med Inf 1997; 47:87-90. (Pubitemid 28052481)
26. Mahajan RP. Critical incident reporting and learning. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:69-75.
27. Cumin D, Weller JM, Henderson K, Merry AF. Standards for simulation in anaesthesia: Creating confidence in the tools. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:45-51.
28. Gale TC, Roberts MJ, Sice PJ, et al. Predictive validity of a selection centre testing nontechnical skills for recruitment to training in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:603-609. The study highlights the importance of nontechnical skills in clinical practice, and how the assessment of these skills can be used in selection process of future doctors in the specialty. Further research is required in this area, and this type of research may become the basis for newer criteria for selection of doctors in different clinical specialties.
29. Gaba DM. Do as we say, not as you do: Using simulation to investigate clinical behavior in action. Simul Healthc 2009; 4:67-69.
30. Gaba DM. Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:3-6.
31. Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Long CD, McPeek B. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of human factors. Anesthesiology 1978; 49:399-406. (Pubitemid 9077572)
32. Flin R, Patey R, Glavin R, Maran N. Anaesthetists' nontechnical skills. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:38-44.
33. Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:143-151.
34. Van Beuzekom M, Boer F, Akerboom S, Hudson P. Patient safety: Latent risk factors. Br J Anaesth 2010; 105:52-59.
35. De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, et al. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1928-1937. The study provides further evidence of association of implementation of this comprehensive checklist with a reduction in surgical complications and mortality. The study is important because it provides such evidence in hospitals with a high existing standard of care.
36. De Saint MG, Auroy Y, Vincent C, Amalberti R. The natural lifespan of a safety policy: Violations and system migration in anaesthesia. Qual Saf Healthcare 2010; 19:327-331.
37. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: Building a safer health system. The Institute of Medicine report on medical error. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
38. Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB, et al. Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:2124-2134. The study provides extremely important current evidence of the fact that patient safety remains an important issue and harms remain common, with little evidence of widespread improvement. Further efforts are, therefore, required to translate effective safety interventions into routine practice and to monitor healthcare safety over time.