An estuarine mudsnail in situ toxicity assay based on postexposure feeding

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1935-1942

  Krell, Bonny ^a   Moreira Santos, Matilde ^a   Ribeiro, Rui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Ecosystem functioning; Egestion; Estuaries; Hydrobia ulvae; Sediment toxicity

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS; EGESTION; EXPOSURE CONDITIONS; HYDROBIA ULVAE; IN-SITU; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL; ORGANIC MATTER DECOMPOSITION; POST-EXPOSURE; POSTEXPOSURE FEEDING; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; REALISTIC EXPOSURE SCENARIO; SEDIMENT GRAIN SIZE; SEDIMENT TOXICITY; SUBLETHAL TOXICITY; SURVIVAL AND GROWTH; TOXICITY ASSAYS;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; ASSAYS; ESTUARIES; FEEDING; POPULATION STATISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEDIMENTOLOGY; TOXICITY;

ECOSYSTEMS;

COPPER;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIOASSAY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COPPER; DECOMPOSITION; ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION; EMERGENCE; ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; ESTUARINE POLLUTION; ESTUARINE SEDIMENT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GRAIN SIZE; GROWTH RESPONSE; IN SITU TEST; LABORATORY METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; ORGANIC MATTER; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTION; SALINITY; SEDIMENT POLLUTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SNAIL; SURVIVAL; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TOXICITY;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ESTUARINE SPECIES; FEEDING ECOLOGY; HYDROBIA ULVAE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SNAIL; SURVIVAL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; COPPER; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; RIVERS; SALINITY; SEAWATER; SNAILS; TEMPERATURE; TOXICITY TESTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

BEJA [PORTUGAL]; MIRA RIVER; PORTUGAL;

HYDROBIA ULVAE;

EID: 79960102445     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.585     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Chapman PM, Ho KT, Munnus WR Jr, Solomon K, Weinstein MP. 2002. Issues in sediment toxicity and ecological risk assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 44: 271-278.
2. Chapman PM, Wang F. 2001. Assessing sediment contamination in estuaries. Environ Toxicol Chem 20: 3-22.
3. Long ER. 2000. Spatial extent of sediment toxicity in U.S. estuaries and marine bays. Environ Monit Assess 64: 391-407.
4. McCauley DJ, DeGraeve GM, Linton TK. 2000. Sediment quality guidelines and assessment: Overview and research needs. Environ Sci Policy 3: 133-144.
5. Baird DJ, Brown SS, Lagadic L, Liess M, Maltby L, Moreira-Santos M, Schulz R, Scott GI. 2007. In situ-based effects measures: Determining the ecological relevance of measured responses. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3: 259-267.
6. Crane M, Burton GA, Culp JM, Greenberg MS, Munkittrick KR, Ribeiro R, Salazar MH, St-Jean SD. 2007. Review of aquatic in situ approaches for stressor and effect diagnosis. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3: 234-245.
7. Liber K, Goodfelow W, Besten P, Clements W, Galloway T, Gerhardt A, Green A, Simpson S. 2007. In situ-based effect measures: Considerations for improving methods and approaches. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3: 246-258.
8. Maltby L, Kedwards TJ, Forbes VE, Grasman K, Kammenga JE, Munns WR Jr, Ringwood AH, Weis JS, Wood SN. 2001. Linking individual-level responses and population-level consequences. In Baird DJ, Burton GA Jr, eds, Ecological Variability: Separating Natural From Anthropogenic Causes of Ecosystem Impairment. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, USA, pp 27-82.
9. Moreira SM, Moreira-Santos M, Guilhermino L, Ribeiro R. 2005. A short-term sublethal in situ toxicity assay with Hediste diversicolor (Polychaeta) for estuarine sediment based on postexposure feeding. Environ Toxicol Chem 24: 2010-2018.
10. Moreira SM, Moreira-Santos M, Guilhermino L, Ribeiro R. 2006. An in situ postexposure feeding assay with Carcinus maenas for estuarine sediment-overlying water toxicity evaluations. Environ Pollut 139: 318-329.
11. Soares S, Moreira S, Andrade S, Guilhermino L, Ribeiro R. 2005. Freshwater-saltwater interface and estuarine sediment in situ assays based on post-exposure feeding of chironomids and polychaetes. Estuaries 28: 314-319.
12. McWilliam RA, Baird DJ. 2002. Postexposure feeding depression: A new toxicity endpoint for use in laboratory studies with Daphina magna Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 1198-1205.
13. Shipp E, Grant A. 2006. Hydrobia ulvae feeding rates: A novel way to assess sediment toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 25: 3246-3252.
14. Crichton CA, Conrad AU, Baird DJ. 2004. Assessing stream grazer response to stress: a post-exposure feeding bioassay using the freshwater snail Lymnaea peregra (Müller). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 72: 564-570.
15. López-Figueroa F, Niell FX. 1987. Feeding behaviour of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in microcosms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 114: 153-167.
16. Barnes RSK. 2001. Interference competition in the intertidal mudsnail Hydrobia ulvae: Egestion rate revisted. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 81: 491-495.
17. Barnes RSK. 2006. Variation in feeding rate of the intertidal mudsnail Hydrobia ulvae in relation to the tidal cycle. Mar Ecol 27: 154-159.
18. Forrow DM, Maltby L. 2000. Toward a mechanistic understanding of contaminant-induced changes in detritus processing in streams: Direct and indirect effects on detritivore feeding. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 2100-2106.
19. Maltby L, Clayton SA, Wood RM, McLoughlin N. 2002. Evaluation of the Gammarus pulex in situ feeding assay as a biomonitor of water quality: Robustness, responsiveness, and relevance. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 361-368.
20. Cardoso PG, Lillebø AI, Pardal MA, Ferreira SM, Marques JC. 2002. The effect of different primary producers on Hydrobia ulvae population dynamics: A case study in a temperate intertidal estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 277: 173-195.
21. Graham AFRS. 1988. Molluscs: Prosobranch and Pyramidellid Gastropods: Key and Notes for the Identification of the Species, 2nd ed. Linnean Society of London, London, UK.
22. Lillebø AI, Pardal MA, Marques JC. 1999. Population structure, dynamics and production of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) (Mollusca: Prosobranchia) along an eutrophication gradient in the Mondego estuary (Portugal). Acta Oecol 20: 289-304.
23. Fenchel T. 1975. Character displacement and coexistence in mud snails (Hydrobiidae). Oecologia 20: 19-32.
24. Fenchel T. 1975. Factors determining the distribution patterns of mud snails (Hydrobiidae). Oecologia 20: 1-17.
25. Hylleberg G. 1975. The effect of salinity and temperature on egestion in mud snails (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae): A study on niche overlap. Oecologia 21: 279-289.
26. Forbes VE, Depledge MH. 1992. Cadmium effects on the carbon and energy balance of mudsnails. Mar Biol 113: 263-269.
27. Hampel M, Moreno-Garrido I, González-Mazo E, Blasco J. 2009. Suitability of the marine prosobranch snail Hydrobia ulvae for sediment toxicity assessment: A case study with the anionic surfactant linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72: 1234-1241.
28. Kofoed LH. 1975. The feeding biology of Hydrobia ventrosa (Montagu). II. Allocation of the components of the carbon-budget and the significance of the secretion of dissolved organic material. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 19: 243-256.
29. Blanchard GF, Guarini J, Provot L, Richard P, Sauriau P. 2000. Measurement of ingestion rate of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) on intertidal epipelic microalgae: The effect of mud snail density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 255: 247-260.
30. Guillard RRL. 1983. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In Berg CJ Jr, ed, Culture of Marine Invertebrates. Hutchinson-Ross, Stroudsberg, PA, USA, pp 108-132.
31. Finnegan MC, Pittman S, DeLorenzo ME. 2009. Lethal and sublethal toxicity of the antifoulant compound Irgarol 1051 to the mud snail Ilyanassa obsolete Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56: 85-95.
32. Moreira SM, Lima I, Ribeiro R, Guilhermino L. 2006. Effects of estuarine sediment contamination on feeding and on key physiological functions of Hediste diversicolor: Laboratory and in situ assays. Aquat Toxicol 78: 186-201.
33. Caeiro S, Painho M, Goovaerts P, Costa H, Sousa S. 2003. Spatial sampling design for sediment quality assessment in estuaries. Environ Modell Softw 18: 853-859.
34. Caeiro S, Costa MH, Ramos TB, Fernandes F, Silveira N, Coimbra A, Medeiros G, Painho M. 2005. Assessing heavy metals contamination in Sado estuary sediment: An index analysis approach. Ecol Indic 5: 151-169.
35. Costa FO, Correia AD, Costa MH. 1998. Acute marine sediment toxicity: A potential new test with the amphipod Gammarus locusta Exotoxicol Environ Saf 40: 81-87.
36. Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development. 1998. Report of the OECD workshop on statistical analysis of aquatic toxicity data. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, Vol 10. Paris, France.
37. Moreira SM, Guilhermino L, Ribeiro R. 2006. An in situ assay with the microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum for sediment-overlying water toxicity evaluations in estuaries. Environ Toxicol Chem 25: 2272-2279.
38. Moreira dos Santos M, Moreno-Garrido I, Gonçalves F, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R. 2002. An in situ bioassay for estuarine environments using the microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 567-574.
39. Pascual E, Drake P. 2008. Physiological and behavioural responses of the mud snails Hydrobia glyca and Hydrobia ulvae to extreme water temperatures and salinities: Implications for their spatial distribution within a system of temperate lagoons. Physiol Biochem Zool 81: 594-604.
40. Chapman PM. 2000. Whole effluent toxicity test - usefulness, level of protection and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 19: 3-13.
41. Orvain F, Sauriau PG. 2002. Environmental and behavioural factors affecting activity in the intertidal gastropod Hydrobia ulvae J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 272: 191-216.
42. Castro BB, Sobral O, Guilhermino L, Ribeiro R. 2004. An in situ bioassay integrating individual and biochemical responses using small fish species. Ecotoxicology 13: 667-681.
43. Lopes I, Moreira-Santos M, Rendón-von Osten J, Baird DJ, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R. 2011. Suitability of five cladoceran species from Mexico for in situ experimentation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74: 111-116.
44. Moreira-Santos M, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R. 2004. An in situ bioassay for freshwater environments with the microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 59: 164-173.
45. Moreira-Santos M, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R. 2004. A phytoplankton growth assay for routine in situ environmental assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 23: 1549-1560.
46. Moreira-Santos M, da Silva EM, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R. 2005. In situ and laboratory microalgal assays in the tropics: A microcosm simulation of edge-of-field pesticide runoff. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 74: 48-55.
47. Moreira-Santos M, Antunes SC, Gonçalves F, Soares AMVM, Ribeiro R. 2011. An in situ toxicity assay with the local phytoplankton community. Environ Toxicol Chem 30: 196-205.
48. Pereira AMM, Soares AMVM, Gonçalves F, Ribeiro R. 1999. Test chambers and test procedures for in situ toxicity testing with zooplankton. Environ Toxicol Chem 18: 1956-1964.
49. Pereira AMM, Soares AMVM, Gonçalves F, Ribeiro R. 2000. Water-column, sediment, and in situ chronic bioassays with cladocerans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 47: 27-38.
50. Ringwood AH, Keppler CJ. 2002. Comparative in situ and laboratory sediment bioassays with juvenile Mercenaria mercenaria Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 1651-1657.