Factors effecting science achievement of science students in programme for international students' achievement (pisa) in turkey;Uluslararasi oǧrenci baarilarini deǧerlendirme programi (pisa)'nda turkiye'deki oǧrencilerin fen bilimleri baarilarini etkileyen faktorler

Egitim ve Bilim

Volumn 34, Issue 152, 2009, Pages 87-100

  Anil, Duygu ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Multi Regression Analysis; Pisa 2006; Success At Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960095906     PISSN: 13001337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alomar, B.O. (2006). Personel and Family Paths to Pupil Achievement. Social Behavior and Personality, 34 (8):907-922.
2. Baykul, Y. (2000). Eǧitimde ve Psikolojide Olçme: Klasik test Teorisi ve Uygulamas. OSYM Yaynlar, Ankara.
3. Buyukozturk, S. (2006). Sosyal Bilimleri Için Veri Analizi El Kitab? Istatistik Araştrma Deseni-SPSS Uygulamalar ve Yorum, Pegema Yaynclk, Ankara.
4. Christman, E. &Badgett, J. (1999). A comparative analysis of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on student achievement in differing science and demographic areas. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18, 135-143.
5. Clements,D.H . (1997). Effective Use of Computers with young Children, ERIC Documents reproduction Service, No: Ed 436,231.
6. Dreeben, R., &Gamoran, A. (1986). Race, instruction, and learning. American Sociological Review, 51, 660-669.
7. Fuchs,T., Woessmann,L. (2004). Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School. Ifo Working Paper No. 8.
8. Karweit, N. L., &Slavin, R. E. (1981). Measurement andmodeling choices in studies of time and learning.American Educational Research Journal, 18, 157-171.
9. Kulik, C.C.; Kulik, J.A. (1985). Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Colleges (ERIC Documents Reproduction Service, No: ED 263, 890).
10. MEB.(2007). PISA 2006 Uluslararas? Oǧrenci Deǧerlendirme Projesi, Ulusal On Rapor. Eǧitim Araştrma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Yaynlar.(PISA 2006, Turkiye Raporu, 2007).
11. MEB.(2005). PISA 2003 Uluslararas Oǧrenci Deǧerlendirme Projesi, Ulusal Nihai Rapor. Eǧitim Araştrma ve Geliştirme Dairesi Yay?nlar.(PISA 2003, Turkiye Raporu, 2005).
12. Neter, J.W. ve Whitmore, G.A., (1978). Applied Statistics, USA: Allyn &Bacon.
13. Oliver, J.S.& Simpson. RD. (1988). 'Influences of AttitudeToward Science, Achievement Motivation, and Science Se If Concept on Achievement in Science: A longitudinal Study". Science Education 72 (2):143 -]55.
14. OECD( 2006a) PISA 2003 Technical Report, OECD, Paris.
15. OECD( 2006a) Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006, OECD, Paris.
16. Ozdamar, K. (2002). Paket Programlar? ile Istatistiksel Veri Analizi (Cok Deǧişkenli Analizler), 5. Bask?, Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
17. Pedhazur, E.J., (1982) Multiple Regression in Bihavoral Research: Explanation and Prediction, TX: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
18. Schumacker, R.E,ve Lomax, R,G. (1996). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
19. Taningco,M.T.V, Pachon,H.P. (2008). Computer Use, Parental Expectations and Latino Academic Achievement.Tomas Rivera Policy Institute.
20. Zeith,T.Z,Cool,V.A. (1992). Testing Models of School Learning: Effects of Quality of Instruction, Motivation, Academic Coursework, and Homework on Academic Achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7 (3) :207.
21. Wiley, D. E. (1976). Another hour, another day: Quantity of schooling, a potent path for policy. In W.
22. Sewell,R. &D. Featherman (Eds.), Schooling and achievement in American society, 225-265. NewYork: Academic Press.
23. Xie,Y ve Powers,D,A. (2000). Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis, Academic Press.