A computational framework for quantitative evaluation of movement during rehabilitation

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1371, Issue , 2011, Pages 317-326

  Chen, Yinpeng ^a   Duff, Margaret ^a,b   Lehrer, Nicole ^a   Sundaram, Hari ^a   He, Jiping ^b   Wolf, Steven L ^c   Rikakis, Thanassis ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Kinematic impairment measure (KIM); Quantitative evaluation; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960081458     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3596656     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Y. CHEN (2009). Constraint-aware computational adaptation framework to support realtime multimedia applications. Department of Electrical Engineering, Arizona State University.
2. M. C. CIRSTEA and M. F. LEVIN (2000). Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123: 940-953. (Pubitemid 30224190)
3. M. C. CIRSTEA, A. B. MITNITSKI, et al. (2003). Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res 151(3): 289-300. (Pubitemid 36920892)
4. M. DUFF, Y. CHEN, et al. (2010). An Adaptive Mixed Reality Training System for Stroke Rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems & Rehabilitation Engineering 18(5): 531-541.
5. P. W. DUNCAN, D. WALLACE, et al. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Stroke 30: 2131-2140. (Pubitemid 29473260)
6. A. R. FUGL-MEYER, L. JAASKO, et al. (1975). The poststroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med. 7(13-31).
7. N. HOGAN (1984). An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. The Journal of Neuroscience 4(11): 2745-2754. (Pubitemid 15224418)
8. T. JOACHIMS (2003). Optimizing Search Engines using Clickthrough Data, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2003.
9. G. KWAKKEL, B. J. KOLLEN, et al. (2008). Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 22: 111-121. (Pubitemid 351287594)
10. G. KWAKKEL (2009). Towards integrative neurorehabilitation science. Physiother Res Int 14(3): 137-146.
11. M. F. LEVIN, J. A. KLEIM, et al. (2009). What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 23(4): 313-319.
12. A. MIRELMAN, P. PATRITTI, et al. (2010). Effects of virtual reality training on gait biomechanics of individuals post-stroke. Gait and Posture 31: 433-437.
13. L. PIRON, P. TONIN, et al. (2005). Virtual Environment Training Therapy for Arm Motor Rehabilitation. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 14: 732-740.
14. G. USWATTE and E. TAUB (2006). The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology Report 67: 1189-1194. (Pubitemid 44563826)
15. S. L. WOLF, P. A. CATLIN, et al. (2001). Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32: 1635-1639. (Pubitemid 32631916)