Should we consider expected environmental benefits when planting larger or smaller tree species?

Arboriculture and Urban Forestry

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 167-172

  Sydnor, T Davis ^a   Subburayalu, Sakthi K ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community Forestry; Crataegus; Environmental Benefits; Gleditsia; Hawthorn; Honeylocust; I Tree; I Tree Streets; STRATUM; Street Trees; Urban Forestry

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; SOFTWARE; SURVIVAL; TREE PLANTING; URBAN FORESTRY;

BROOKLYN; NEW YORK [NEW YORK (STT)]; NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

CRATAEGUS; GLEDITSIA; GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS; PSEUDOBAHIA;

EID: 79960080814     PISSN: 02785226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anonymous. 2009. Sacramento Tree Foundation. Accessed July 9, 2009. http://www.sactree.com/doc.aspx?25
2. Anonymous. 2006. iTree: Tools for managing and assessing Community Forests. Accessed May17, 2009. http://www.itreetools.org/
3. Kuo, F.E. 2001. Coping with poverty: Impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior 33:5-3
4. Heimlich, J.E., T.D. Sydnor, M. Bumgardner, and P. O'Brien. 2008. Attitudes of residents toward street trees on four streets in Toledo, Ohio, U.S. before removal of ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) from emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(1):47-53. (Pubitemid 351234345)
5. Maco, S., and G. McPherson. 2003. A practical approach to assessing structure, function, and value of street tree populations in small communities. Journal of Arboriculture 29:84-97. (Pubitemid 43870438)
6. McPherson, E.G., J.R. Simpson, P.J. Peper, S.E. Maco, S.L. Gardner. S.K.Cozad, and Q. Xia. 2006. Midwest Community Tree Guide. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station General Technical Report PSW-GTR-199. 100 pp.
7. McPherson, E.G. 2005. Trees with benefits. American Nurseryman 201:34-40
8. Reisch, K.W., G. Hull, and H.M. Hill. 1971. Case Histories of Several Street Tree Species and Cultivars at Selected Sites in Five Ohio Cities. Horticulture Series 376. Ohio Agricultural and Development Center, Wooster, OH. 65 pp.
9. Santamour, F.S., Jr. 1990. Trees for urban planting: Diversity, uniformity and common sense. Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance (METRIA) 7:57-65.
10. Schroeder, H.W., and S.R. Ruffolo. 1996. Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb. Journal of Arboriculture 22:35-43 (Pubitemid 126442991)
11. Schroeder, H., J. Flannigan, and R. Coles. 2006. Residents' Attitudes toward Street Trees in the UK and U.S. Communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:236-246. (Pubitemid 44463602)
12. Sydnor, T.D., S. Subburayalu, J. Chatfield, E. Draper, A. Stone, K. Smith, and J. Conglose. 2010. Street Tree Evaluation Project: Forty Years of Street Tree Evaluation in Five Communities. Ohio State University Extension Bulletin #877. Columbus, OH. 100 pp.
13. Wolf, Kathleen L. 2003. Public response to urban forest in inner-city business districts. Journal of Arboriculture 29:117-126.