How each movement changes the next: An experimental and theoretical study of fast adaptive priors in reaching

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 27, 2011, Pages 10050-10059

  Verstynen, Timothy ^a   Sabes, Philip N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; THEORETICAL STUDY; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOVEMENT; NERVE NET; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960073505     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6525-10.2011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Avillac M, Denève S, Olivier E, Pouget A, Duhamel JR (2005) frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:941-949.
2. Burnod Y, Baraduc P, Battaglia-Mayer A, Guigon E, Koechlin E, Ferraina S, Lacquaniti F, Caminiti R (1999) Parieto-frontal coding of reaching: an integrated framework. Exp Brain Res 129:325-346.
3. Cheng S, Sabes PN (2006) Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems. Neural Comput 18:760-793.
4. Cheng S, Sabes PN (2007) Calibration of visually guided reaching is driven by error-corrective learning and internal dynamics. J Neurophysiol 97:3057-3069.
5. Deneve S, Pouget A (2004) Bayesian multisensory integration and crossmodal spatial links. J Physiol Paris 98:249-258.
6. Deneve S, Latham PE, Pouget A (1999) Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers. Nat Neurosci 2:740-745.
7. Deneve S, Latham PE, Pouget A (2001) Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes. Nat Neurosci 4:826-831.
8. Deneve S, Duhamel JR, Pouget A (2007) Optimal sensorimotor integration in recurrent cortical networks: a neural implementation of Kalman filters. J Neurosci 27:5744-5756.
9. Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4:423-431.
10. Diedrichsen J, White O, Newman D, Lally N (2010) Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors. J Neurosci 30:5159-5166.
11. Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE (1986) Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233:1416-1419.
12. Georgopoulos AP, Kettner RE, Schwartz AB (1988) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space. II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population. J Neurosci 8:2928-2937.
13. Grubbs FE (1950) Sample criteria for testing outlying observations. Ann Math Stat 21:27-58.
14. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behavior: a neurophysiological theory, New York: Wiley.
15. Huang VS, Shadmehr R (2009) Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event. J Neurophysiol 102:931-940.
16. Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer J (2011) Rethinking motor learn-ing and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron 70:787-801.
17. Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A (2004) Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol 55:271-304.
18. Kluzik J, Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ (2008) Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? J Neurophysiol 100:1455-1464.
19. Knill DC (2007) Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. J Vis 7:5.1-5.24.
20. Körding KP, Wolpert DM (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427:244-247.
21. Körding KP, Tenenbaum JB, Shadmehr R (2007) The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nat Neurosci 10:779-786.
22. Lages M, Heron S (2008) Motion and disparity processing informs Bayesian 3D motion estimation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:E117.
23. Latham PE, Deneve S, Pouget A (2003) Optimal computation with attractor networks. J Physiol Paris 97:683-694.
24. Lu H, Yuille AL, Liljeholm M, Cheng PW, Holyoak KJ (2008) Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychol Rev 115:955-984.
25. Ma WJ, Beck JM, Latham PE, Pouget A (2006) Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat Neurosci 9:1432-1438.
26. Miyazaki M, Nozaki D, Nakajima Y (2005) Testing Bayesian models of human coincidence timing. J Neurophysiol 94:395-399.
27. Oja E (1982) A simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. J Math Biol 15:267-273.
28. Pouget A, Zhang K, Deneve S, Latham PE (1998) Statistically efficient estimation using population coding. Neural Comput 10:373-401.
29. Pouget A, Deneve S, Duhamel JR (2002) A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:741-747.
30. Pouget A, Dayan P, Zemel RS (2003) Inference and computation with population codes. Annu Rev Neurosci 26:381-410.
31. Sato Y, Toyoizumi T, Aihara K (2007) Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect: identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli. Neural Comput 19:3335-3355.
32. Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2001) Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86:971-985.
33. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208-3224.
34. Slijper H, Richter J, Over E, Smeets J, Frens M (2009) Statistics predict kinematics of hand movements during everyday activity. J Mot Behav 41:3-9.
35. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4:e179.
36. Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2003) Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23:6982-6992.
37. Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2005) Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8:490-497.
38. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742-747.
39. Wei K, Körding K (2010) Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation. Front Comput Neurosci 4:11.
40. Weiss Y, Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH (2002) Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nat Neurosci 5:598-604.
41. Wu S, Amari S (2005) Computing with continuous attractors: stability and online aspects. Neural Comput 17:2215-2239.
42. Wu S, Amari S, Nakahara H (2002) Population coding and decoding in a neural field: a computational study. Neural Comput 14:999-1026.
43. Wu S, Chen D, Niranjan M, Amari S (2003) Sequential Bayesian decoding with a population of neurons. Neural Comput 15:993-1012.