Special issue on Supporting Collaboration in Healthcare Settings: The Role of Informatics

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 541-543

  Reddy, Madhu C ^a   Gorman, Paul ^b   Bardram, Jakob ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL; EDITORIAL; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; WORKFLOW;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 79960071580     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.05.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Shortliffe E.H., Barnett G.O., Cimino J.J., Greenes A., Huff S.M., Patel V.L. Collaborative medical Informatics research using the Internet and the World Wide Web. Proceedings of AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1996, 125-129.
2. Reddy M., Bradner E. Multiple perspectives: evaluating healthcare information systems in collaborative environments. Evaluating Healthcare Information Systems: Methods and Applications 2005, Springer, New York. 2nd ed. J. Anderson, C. Aydin (Eds.).
3. Heath C., Luff P. Documents and professional practice: 'bad' organisational reasons for 'good' clinical records. Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1996, 354-363.
4. Berg M. Accumulating and coordinating: occasions for information technologies in medical work. J. Comp. Support. Cooper. Work 1999, 8:373-401.
5. Bardram J.E. Activity-based computing for medical work in hospitals. ACM Trans. Comp.-Human Interact. 2009, 16(2):1-36.
6. Reddy M., Dourish P., Pratt W. Coordinating heterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care. Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW'01) 2001, 239-258.
7. Aarts J., Ash J., Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int. J. Med. Informatics 2007, 76(Suppl. 1):S4-S13.
8. Baggs J.G., Schmitt M.H. Collaboration between nurses and physicians. Image J. Nurs. Sch. 1988, 20(3):145-149.
9. Baggs J.G. Intensive care unit use and collaboration between nurses and physicians. Heart Lung 1989, 18(4):332-338.
10. Berg M., Langenberg C., Berg I.V.D., Kwakkernaat J.K. Considerations for sociotechnical design: experiences with an electronic patient record in a clinical context. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1998, 52:243-251.
11. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1999, 55(2):87-101.
12. Reddy M., Pratt W., Dourish P., Shabot M. Sociotechnical requirements analysis for clinical systems. Methods Inf. Med. 2003, (42):437-444.
13. Kensing F., Blomberg J. Participatory design: issues and concerns. Comp. Support. Cooper. Work 1998, 7:167-185.
14. Mikkelsen G., Aasly J. Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001, 63(3):123-131.
15. Hersh W.R., Helfand M., Wallace J., Kraemer D., Patterson P., Shapiro S., Greenlick M. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med. Inf. Decision Making 2001, 1(5). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/1/5.
16. Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2000, 7(3):277-286.
17. Yousfi F., Beuscart R., Geib J.M. Workflow: a new modeling concept in critical care units. Medinfo 1995, 8(Pt 1(5)):515-519.