In utero and lactation exposure of mice to pan masala: Effect on dams and pregnancy outcome

Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-81

  Archana, K ^a,b   Gautam, A K ^a   Lakkad, BC ^a   Kumar, Sunil ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (India)

^b AMITY UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Birth weight; Fertility index; Gutkha; Live birth index; Pan masala; Pregnancy index; Pregnancy outcome; Viability index; Weaning index

Indexed keywords

PAN MASALA; TOXIC SUBSTANCE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FETOTOXICITY; GESTATIONAL AGE; LACTATION; MOUSE; NEWBORN DEATH; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUP (RODENT); WEANING;

ARECA; ARECA CATECHU; MUS; NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 79960066680     PISSN: 07318898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.v30.i1.70     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Uma Devi P, Nagarathanam A, Satish Rao BS, editors. Radiation effects on embryos. In: Introduction to radiation biology. New Delhi: B I Churchill Livingstone Pvt. Ltd.; 2000. p. 176-92.
2. Gupta PC, Ray CS. Epidemiology of betel quid usage. Ann Acad Med. 2004 Jul;33(Suppl 4):31-6.
3. Huff K, Vance M, Motlekar N. Gutkha: awareness survey of pharmacist and chemical analysis of constituents [abstract]. 19th Annual Undergraduate Research Conference, Butler University; 2007. p. 70.
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Betel-quid and areca-nut chewing and some areca-nutderived nitrosamines. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, France: IARC; 2004. Vol. 85.
5. Sinha A, Rao AR. Embryotoxicity of betel nuts. Toxicology. 1985 Dec;37(3-4):315-26.
6. Paul K, Moitra PK, Mukherjee I, Maity C, Ghosal SK. Teratogenicity of arecoline hydrobromide on developing chick embryos: a preliminary report. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1999 Mar;62(3):356-62.
7. De Costa C, Griew AR. Effects of betel chewing on pregnancy outcome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Feb;22(1):22-4.
8. Yang MS, Chung TC, Yang MJ, Hsu TY. Betel quid chewing and risk of adverse birth outcomes among aborigines in eastern Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2001 Nov 23;64(6):465-72.
9. García-Algar O, Vall O, Alameda F, Puig C, Pellegrini M, Pacifici R, Pichini S. Prenatal exposure to arecoline (areca nut alkaloid) and birth outcomes. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 May;90(3):F276-7.
10. Singh A, Rao AR. Effect of arecanut, a masticatory, on hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes-SH content and lipid peroxidation in lactating mothers and their suckling neonates. Cancer Lett. 1995 Jun 8;92(2):175-80.
11. Krishna K. Tobacco chewing in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978, 85: 726-728.
12. Verma RC, Chansoriya M, Kaul KK. Effect of tobacco chewing by mothers on fetal outcome. Indian Pediatr. 1983 Feb;20(2):105-11.
13. Gupta PC, Sreevidya S. Smokeless tobacco use, birth weight and gestational age: population based prospective cohort study of 1217 women in Mumbai, India. BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1538-42.
14. López-Vilchez MA, Seidel V, Farré M, García-Algar O, Pichini S, Mur A. Areca-Nut Abuse and Neonatal Withdrawal Syndrome. Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e129-31.
15. Mosier HD, Jansans RA. Distribution and fate of nicotine in rat fetus. Teratology. 1972 Dec;6(3):303-11.
16. Lackmann GM, Salzberger U, Tollner U, Chen M, Carmella SG, Hecht SS. Metabolites of a tobacco-specific carcinogen in urine from newborns. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Mar 3;91(5):459-65.
17. Jauniaux E, Gulbis B, Acharya G, Thiry P, Rodeck C. Maternal tobacco exposure and cotinine levels in fetal fluids in the first half of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;93(1):25-9.
18. Parke DV. Toxicology and the newborn. In: Kacew S and Reasor MJ, editors. New York: Elseveir Science; 1984. p3-28.
19. Mojidra BN, Archana K, Gautam AK, Verma Y, Lakkad BC, Kumar S:Evaluation of genotoxicity of pan masala employing chromosomal aberration and micronucleus assay in bone marrow cells of the mice. Toxicol Ind Health. 2009 Aug;25(7):467-71.
20. Jefferson WN, Padilla-Banks E, Newbold RR. Adverse effects on female development and reproduction in CD-1 mice following neonatal exposure to the phytoestrogen genistein at environmentally relevant doses. Biol Reprod. 2005 Oct;73(4):798-806.
21. Rao S, Ovchinnikov N, McRae A. Gestational stage sensitivity to ultrasound effect on postnatal growth and development of mice. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006 Aug;76(8):602-8.
22. Clegg ED, Perreault SD, Klinfelter GR. Assessment of male reproductive toxicity. Principles and methods of toxicology. 4th ed. In: Hayes AW, editor. Taylor and Francis: CRC Press, 2001. p. 1272.
23. Garg SK, Garg GP. Antifertility screening of plants. VII. Effect of five indigenous plants on early pregnancy in albino rats. Indian J Med Res. 1971 Feb;59(2):302-6.
24. Kapoor M, Garg SK, Mathur VS. Antiovulatory activity of five indigenous plants in rabbits. Indian J Med Res. 1974 Aug;62(8):1225-7.
25. Liu ST, Young GC. Effects of arecoline to the peri-implantation mouse embryos in vitro [abstract]. The Society for the Study of the Reproduction. 38th Annual meeting. 2005.
26. Azad Chowdhury AK, Khaleque RA, Chakder SK. Antifertility activity of a traditional contraceptive pill comprising Acacia catechu, A. arabica and Tragia involucerta. Indian J Med Res. 1984 Sep;80:372-4.
27. Soares SR, Simon C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Cigarette smoking affects uterine receptiveness. Hum Reprod. 2007 Feb;22(2):543-7.
28. Psychoyos A. Nidation window: from basic to clinic. Molecular and cellular aspects of periimplantation processes. In: Dey SK, editor. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1995. p. 1-14.
29. Gocze PM, Szabo I, Freeman DA. Influence of nicotine, cotinine, anabasine and cigarette smoke extract on human granulosa cell progesterone and estradiol synthesis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1999 Aug;13(4):266-72.
30. Gocze PM, Freeman DA. Cytotoxic effects of cigarette smoke alkaloids inhibit the progesterone production and cell growth of cultured MA-10 Leydig tumor cells. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Nov;93(1):77-83.
31. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, Bondurant S. Clearing the smoke, assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Committee to Assess the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
32. Paulson RB, Shanfeld J, Vorhees CV, Cole J, Sweazy A, Paulson JO. Behavioral effects of smokeless tobacco on the neonate and young Sprague Dawley rat. Teratology. 1994 Apr;49(4):293-305.
33. Card JP, Mitchell JA: The effects of nicotine on implantation in the rat. Biol Reprod. 1979 Apr;20(3):532-9.
34. Krishanmurty S. Maternal tobacco use and adverse reproductive outcome. Natl Med J India. 1997 Jan-Feb;10(1):2-4.
35. Gupta PC, Subramoney S. Smokeless tobacco use and risk of stillbirth: A cohort study in Mumbai, India. Epidemiology. 2006 Jan;17(1):47-51.
36. Damasceno DC, Lemonica IP. Embryotoxicity and. antiimplantation effects of Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract in pregnant rats within preimplantation period. Rev Bras Toxicol. 1999;12(2):47-54.
37. Krishnamurthy S, Joshi S. Gender differences and low birth weight with maternal smokeless tobacco use in pregnancy. J Trop Pediatr. 1993 Aug;39(4):253-4.