Quality of life and cost-utility assessment after strabismus surgery in adults

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 268-276

  Fujiike, Keiko ^a   Mizuno, Yoshinobu ^a   Hiratsuka, Yoshimune ^b   Yamada, Masakazu ^a  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION TOKYO MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

Burden of disease; Quality of life; Strabismus; Utility; VFQ 25

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT STRABISMUS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DIVERGENT STRABISMUS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; JAPAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE VISUAL FUNCTION QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 8; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STRABISMUS SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOMOTOR MUSCLES; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; STRABISMUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960048487     PISSN: 00215155     EISSN: 16132246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-011-0022-6     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. JD Baker 2002 The value of adult strabismus correction to the patient J AAPOS 6 136 140 12075288 10.1067/mpa.2002.123430 (Pubitemid 41080254)
2. BJ Kushner 1992 Postoperative binocularity in adults with long-standing strabismus Ophthalmology 99 316 319 1565442 1:STN:280:DyaK383ivVCltw%3D%3D
3. RJ Morris WE Scott CF Dickey 1993 Fusion after surgical alignment of long-standing strabismus in adults Ophthalmology 100 135 138 8433818 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7msFalsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 23041142)
4. JL Keltner 1994 Strabismus surgery in adults. Functional and psychological implications Arch Ophthalmol 112 599 600 8185514 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ktF2iug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24155430)
5. E Wortham MJ Greenwald 1989 Expanded binocular peripheral visual fields following surgery for esotropia J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 26 109 112 2723970 (Pubitemid 19115833)
6. BJ Kushner 1994 Binocular field expansion in adults after surgery for esotropia Arch Ophthalmol 112 639 643 8185521 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3ktF2htw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24155437)
7. MK Gill GT Drummond 1997 Indications and outcomes of strabismus repair in visually mature patients Can J Ophthalmol 32 436 440 9435974 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FpvVejtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28112653)
8. SE Olitsky S Sudesh A Graziano J Hamblen SE Brooks SH Shaha 1993 The negative psychosocial impact of strabismus in adults J AAPOS 3 209 211
9. DK Coats EA Paysse AJ Towler RL Dipboye 2000 Impact of large angle horizontal strabismus on ability to obtain employment Ophthalmology 107 402 405 10690845 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00035-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lt1Ojtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30191424)
10. V Menon J Saha R Tandon M Mehta S Khokhar 2002 Study of psychological aspects of strabismus J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 39 203 208 12148552
11. D Satterfield JL Keltner TL Morrison 1993 Psychological aspects of strabismus study Arch Ophthalmol 111 1100 1105 8166786 1:STN:280: DyaK3szls1Kkuw%3D%3D
12. MD Mills DK Coats SP Donahue DT Wheeler 2004 Strabismus surgery for adults. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Ophthalmology 111 1255 1262 15177982 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.013 (Pubitemid 38737011)
13. DK Coats DR Stager Sr GR Beauchamp DR Stager Jr ML Mazow EA Paysse, et al. 2005 Reasons for delay of surgical intervention in adult strabismus Arch Ophthalmol 123 497 499 15824223 10.1001/archopht.123.4.497 (Pubitemid 40489921)
14. HR Taylor ML Pezzullo JE Keeffe 2006 The economic impact and cost of visual impairment in Australia Br J Ophthalmol 90 272 275 16488942 10.1136/bjo.2005.080986 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28%2FpvFOjsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43325453)
15. EM Chia JJ Wang E Rochychina W Smith RR Cumming P Mitchell 2004 Impact of bilateral visual impairment on health-related quality of life: the Blue Mountain eye study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 71 76 14691156 10.1167/iovs.03-0661 (Pubitemid 38055670)
16. R Narma J Wu K Chong SP Azen RD Hays Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group 2006 Impact of severity and bilaterality of visual impairment on health-related quality of life Ophthalmology 113 1846 1853 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.04.028 (Pubitemid 44442430)
17. M Lundström U Stenevi W Thorburn 2001 Quality of life after first- and second-eye cataract surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 27 1553 1559 11687351 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00984-1 (Pubitemid 33020116)
18. ES van de Graaf GW van der Sterre JR Polling H van Kempen B Simonsz HJ Simonsz 2004 Amblyopia and strabismus questionnaire: design and initial validation Strabismus 12 181 193 15370526 10.1080/09273970490491196 (Pubitemid 39440489)
19. CL Beauchamp GR Beauchamp DR Stager Sr MM Brown GC Brown J Felius 2006 The cost utility of strabismus surgery in adults J AAPOS 10 394 399 17070471 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.06.004 (Pubitemid 44633718)
20. Y Suzukamo T Oshika M Yuzawa Y Tokuda A Tomidokoro K Oki, et al. 2005 Psychometric properties of the 25-items National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25), Japanese Version Health Qual Life Outcomes 3 65 16248900 10.1186/1477-7525-3-65 (Pubitemid 41601347)
21. S Fukuhara S Bito J Green A Hsiao K Kurokawa 1998 Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan J Clin Epidemiol 51 1037 1044 9817121 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00095-X 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fjt1Sisw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28527159)
22. CM Mangione PP Lee PR Gutierrez K Spritzer S Berry RD Hays National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators 2001 Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire Arch Ophthalmol 119 1050 1058 11448327 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvhvVSntw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32652197)
23. JE Ware Jr CD Sherbourne 1992 The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 473 483 1593914 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
24. GC Brown 1999 Vision and quality-of-life Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 97 473 511 10703139 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mslOrtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30106064)
25. S Sharma GC Brown MM Brown H Hollands R Robins GK Shah 2002 Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients Br J Ophthalmol 86 493 496 11973240 10.1136/bjo.86.5.493 1:STN:280:DC%2BD383ls1Knug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34454489)
26. CM Bell RH Chapman PW Stone EA Sandberg PJ Neumann 2001 An off-the-shelf help list: a comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses Med Decis Mak 21 288 294 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2FisFyksA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32652492)
27. TO Tengs A Wallace 2000 A thousand health-related quality-of-life estimates Med Care 38 583 637 10843310 10.1097/00005650-200006000-00004 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czgtVaqtA%3D%3D
28. GC Brown MM Brown S Sharma H Brown L Smithen DB Leeser, et al. 2004 Value-based medicine and ophthalmology: an appraisal of cost-utility analyses Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 102 177 188 15747756 (Pubitemid 40706111)
29. Uemura Y, Tsutsui J, Maruo T, Inatomi S, Kozaki M, Watanabe Y, et al. Criteria of strabismus cure. Jpn Rev Clin Ophthalmol. 1978;72:1408-14 (in Japanese).
30. SM Archer DC Musch PA Wren KE Guire MA Del Monte 2005 Social and emotional impact of strabismus surgery on quality of life in children J AAPOS 9 148 151 15838442 10.1016/j.jaapos.2004.12.006 (Pubitemid 40544890)
31. O Uretman S Egrilmez S Kose K Pamukçu C Akkin M Palamar 2003 Negative social bias against children with strabismus Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81 138 142 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00024.x (Pubitemid 36609214)