A Conditional Value-at-Risk Based Inexact Water Allocation Model

Water Resources Management

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2125-2145

  Shao, L G ^a   Qin, X S ^b   Xu, Y ^b,c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Conditional value at risk; Interval linear programming; Two stage stochastic programming; Uncertainty; Water resources management

Indexed keywords

CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK; INTERVAL LINEAR PROGRAMMING; TWO-STAGE STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; UNCERTAINTY; WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING; LOSSES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RESERVOIRS (WATER); RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; VALUE ENGINEERING;

WATER RESOURCES;

DECISION MAKING; LINEAR PROGRAMING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STOCHASTICITY; TRADE-OFF; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

EID: 79960044926     PISSN: 09204741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-011-9799-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersson F, Mausser H, Rosen D, Uryasev S (2001) Credit risk optimization with conditional value-at-risk criterion. Math Program 89(2): 273-291.
2. Carneiro MC, Ribas GP, Hamacher S (2010) Risk management in the oil supply chain: a CVaR approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(7): 3286-3294.
3. Chang NB, Wen CG, Chen YL, Yong YC (1996) A grey fuzzy multiobjective programming approach for the optimal planning of a reservoir watershed, part A: theoretical development. Water Res 30(10): 2329-2340.
4. Dai L, Chen CH, Birge JR (2000) Convergence properties of two-stage stochastic programming. J Optim Theory Appl 106(3): 489-509.
5. Eiger G, Shamir U (1991) Optimal operation of reservoirs by stochastic programming. Eng Optim 17(4): 293-312.
6. Guo P, Huang GH, He L (2008) ISMISIP: an inexact stochastic mixed integer linear semi-infinite programming approach for solid waste management and planning under uncertainty. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(6): 759-775.
7. Huang GH (1996) IPWM: an interval-parameter water quality management model. Eng Optim 26(2): 79-103.
8. Huang GH, Loucks DP (2000) An inexact two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 17(2): 95-118.
9. Huang GH, Baetz BW, Patry GG (1993) A grey fuzzy linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 10(2): 123-146.
10. Kall P (1979) Computational methods for solving two-stage stochastic linear programming problems. Z Angew Math Phys 30(2): 261-271.
11. Kira D, Kusy M, Rakita I (1997) A stochastic linear programming approach to hierarchical production planning. J Oper Res Soc 48(2): 207-211.
12. Li YP, Huang GH (2007) Inexact multistage stochastic quadratic programming method for planning water resources systems under uncertainty. Environ Eng Sci 24(10): 1361-1377.
13. Li YP, Huang GH, Nie SL, Mo DW (2008) Interval-parameter robust quadratic programming for water quality management under uncertainty. Eng Optim 40(7): 613-635.
14. Maqsood I, Huang GH, Yeomans JS (2005) An interval-parameter fuzzy two-stage stochastic program for water resources management under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 167(1): 208-225.
15. Piantadosi J, Metcalfe AV, Howlett PG (2008) Stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) with a conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) criterion for management of storm-water. J Hydrol 348(3-4): 320-329.
16. Qin XS, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Chakma A, Huang YF (2007) An interval-parameter fuzzy nonlinear optimization model for stream water quality management under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 180(3): 1331-1357.
17. Qin XS, Huang GH, Liu L (2010) A genetic-algorithm-aided chance-constrained programming model for regional air quality management under uncertainty. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60(1): 63-71.
18. Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2(3): 21-41.
19. Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2002) Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J Bank Finance 26(7): 1443-1471.
20. Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory Decis 31(1): 49-73.
21. Russell SO, Campbell PF (1996) Reservoir operating rules with fuzzy programming. J Water Resour Plann Manage 122(3): 165-170.
22. Wagner JM, Shamir U, Marks DH (1994) Containing groundwater contamination: planning models using stochastic programming with recourse. Eur J Oper Res 77(1): 1-26.
23. Wang LZ, Fang L, Hipel KW (2003) Water resources allocation: a cooperative game theoretic approach. J Environ Inform 2(2): 11-22.
24. Webby RB, Adamson PT, Boland J (2007) The Mekong-applications of value at risk (VaR) and conditional value at risk (CVaR) simulation to the benefits, costs and consequences of water resources development in a large river basin. Ecol Modell 201(1): 89-96.
25. Xu Y, Qin XS (2010) Rural effluent control under uncertainty: an inexact double-sided fuzzy chance-constrained model. Adv Water Resour 33(9): 997-1014.
26. Xu Y, Huang GH, Qin XS (2009) Inexact two-stage stochastic robust optimization model for water resources management under uncertainty. Environ Eng Sci 26(12): 1765-1776.
27. Yamout GM, Hatfield K, Romeijn HE (2007) Comparison of new conditional value-at-risk-based management models for optimal allocation of uncertain water supplies. Water Resour Res 43(7): W07430.