AutoSPARQL: Let users query your knowledge base

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6643 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2011, Pages 63-79

  Lehmann, Jens ^a   Bühmann, Lorenz ^a  

^a AKSW   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING; BENCHMARK DATA; KNOWLEDGE BASE; KNOWLEDGE BASIS; LINKED DATUM; QUESTION ANSWERING; SEMANTIC WEB STANDARDS; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING; TOOLS AND METHODS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 79960042542     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21034-1_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Angles, R., Gutierrez, C.: The expressive power of SPARQL. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008, LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 114-129. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
2. Bryant, C.H., Muggleton, S., Oliver, S.G., Kell, D.B., Reiser, P.G.K., King, R.D.: Combining inductive logic programming, active learning and robotics to discover the function of genes. Electron. Trans. Artif. Intell. 5(B), 1-36 (2001)
3. Cimiano, P., Rudolph, S., Hartfiel, H.: Computing intensional answers to questions - an inductive logic programming approach. Data Knowl. Eng. 69(3), 261-278(2010)
4. Clark, L.: Sparql views: A visual sparql query builder for drupal. In: 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2010) (Posters&Demo track) (November 2010)
5. Cumby, C.M., Roth, D.: Learning with feature description logics. In: Matwin, S., Sammut, C. (eds.) ILP 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2583, pp. 32-47. Springer, Heidelberg (2003) (Pubitemid 36242051)
6. Fanizzi, N., d'Amato, C., Esposito, F.: DL-FOIL concept learning in description logics. In: Železný, F., Lavrač, N. (eds.) ILP 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5194, pp. 107-121. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
7. Iannone, L., Palmisano, I., Fanizzi, N.: An algorithm based on counterfactuals for concept learning in the semantic web. Applied Intelligence 26(2), 139-159 (2007) (Pubitemid 46384920)
8. Kietz, J.-U., Morik, K.: A polynomial approach to the constructive induction of structural knowledge. Machine Learning 14, 193-217 (1994)
9. Lehmann, J.: DL-Learner: Learning concepts in description logics. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) 10, 2639-2642 (2009)
10. Lehmann, J., Haase, C.: Ideal downward refinement in the ε L description logic. In: De Raedt, L. (ed.) ILP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5989, pp. 73-87. Springer, Heidelberg(2010)
11. Lehmann, J., Hitzler, P.: Concept learning in description logics using refinement operators. Machine Learning Journal 78(1-2), 203-250 (2010)
12. Muggleton, S., Santos, J., Tamaddoni-Nezhad, A.: ProGolem: A system based on relative minimal generalisation. In: De Raedt, L. (ed.) ILP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5989, pp. 131-148. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
13. Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H., de Wolf, R. (eds.): Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming. LNCS, vol. 1228. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
14. Ṕerez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 30-43. Springer, Heidelberg(2006) (Pubitemid 44892019)
15. Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey. Computer Sciences Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2009)