Influence of assessment setting on the results of functional analyses of problem behavior

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 565-567

  Lang, Russell ^a   Sigafoos, Jeff ^b   Lancioni, Giulio ^c   Didden, Robert ^d   Rispoli, Mandy ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^e TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Autism; Developmental disability; Functional analysis; Setting

Indexed keywords

AUTISM; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

AUTISTIC DISORDER; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 79960037734     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-565     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Carr, E. G., Yarbrough, S. C., & Langdon, N. A. (1997). Effects of idiosyncratic stimulus variables on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 673-686. (Pubitemid 127456078)
2. Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 147-185. (Pubitemid 38613362)
3. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197-209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3-20, 1982)
4. Lang, R., Davis, T., O'Reilly, M. F., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M. J., Sigafoos, J., et al. (2010). Functional analysis and treatment of elopement across two school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 113-118.
5. Lang, R., O'Reilly, M., Lancioni, G., Rispoli, M., Machalicek, W., Chan, J. M., et al. (2009). Discrepancy in functional analysis results across two applied settings: Implications for intervention design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 393-397.
6. Lang, R., O'Reilly, M., Machalicek, W., Lancioni, G., Rispoli, M., & Chan, J. M. (2008). A preliminary comparison of functional analysis results when conducted in contrived versus naturalistic settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 441-445.
7. McComas, J. J., Thompson, A., & Johnson, L. (2003). The effects of presession attention on problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 297-307. (Pubitemid 38613348)
8. O'Reilly, M. F., Edrishina, C., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). The effects of presession attention on subsequent attention- extinction and alone conditions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 731-735.
9. Ringdahl, J. E., & Sellers, J. A. (2000). The effects of different adults as therapists during functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 247-250.
10. Smith, R. G., Iwata, B. A., Goh, H., & Shore, B. A. (1995). Analysis of establishing operations for selfinjury maintained by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 515-535.