Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 119, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 323-330

  Freitas Jr, Amilcar C ^a,b   Bonfante, Estevam A ^c   Rocha, Eduardo P ^b   Silva, Nelson R F A ^a   Marotta, Leonard ^a   Coelho, Paulo G ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c UNIGRANRIO University School of Health Sciences   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cement retained; Fractography; Implant supported prostheses; Reliability; Screw retained

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; DENTAL ALLOY; RELY X UNICEM; RESIN CEMENT; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOY (TIAL6V4); WATER;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE;

BIOMECHANICS; CEMENTATION; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MAXILLA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TORQUE; WATER;

EID: 79960027314     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00837.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Traini T, Di lorio D, Caputi S. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 296-301.
2. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry, 2nd edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998; 549-573.
3. Rajan M, Gunaseelan R. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 578-580.
4. Freitas Junior AC, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, Rocha EP, De Almeida EO. Aesthetic approach in single immediate implant-supported restoration. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21: 792-796.
5. Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 719-728.
6. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
7. Misch C. Principles for screw-retained prostheses. Misch CE Dental Implant Prosthetics San LuÌs: Elsevier Mosby, 2005; 452-471.
8. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 76-94.
9. Finger IM, Castellon P, Block M, Elian N. The evolution of external and internal implant/abutment connections. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003; 15: 625-632; quiz 634.
10. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hammerle CH. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 850-858.
11. Da Silva EF, Pellizzer EP, Quinelli Mazaro JV, Garcia Junior IR. Influence of the connector and implant design on the implant-tooth-connected prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 254-262.
12. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 604-610.
13. Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 75-78.
14. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1276-1284.
15. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 119-130.
16. Muche R, Krausse A, Strub JR. [Success rates of implant supported prostheses in partially edentulous patients - Part II]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2003; 113: 404-410.
17. Piermatti J, Yousef H, Luke A, Mahevich R, Weiner S. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 427-435.
18. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 625-642.
19. Guess PC, Zavanelli RA, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 434-442.
20. Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Coelho PG. Reliability of metalloceramic and zirconia-based ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 1051-1056.
21. Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Navarro JM Jr, Pegoraro LF, Bonfante G, Thompson VP, Silva NR. Reliability and failure modes of implant-supported Y-TZP and MCR three-unit bridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 235-243.
22. Coelho PG, Bonfante EA, Silva NR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Laboratory simulation of Y-TZP all-ceramic crown clinical failures. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 382-386.
23. Coelho PG, Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Guess PC, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Fatigue testing of two porcelain-zirconia all-ceramic crown systems. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1122-1127.
24. Nelson W. Accelerated testing: statistical models, test plans and data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.
25. Silva NR, Coelho PG, Fernandes CA, Navarro JM, Dias RA, Thompson VP. Reliability of one-piece ceramic implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88: 419-426.
26. Zhao W, Elsayed E. A general accelerated life model for step-stress testing. IEEE Trans Reliabil 2005; 37: 1059-1069.
27. Hellsing G. On the regulation of interincisor bite force in man. J Oral Rehabil 1980; 7: 403-411.
28. Manda MG, Psyllaki PP, Tsipas DN, Koidis PT. Observations on an in-vivo failure of a titanium dental implant/abutment screw system: a case report. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 89: 264-273.
29. Silva NR, De Souza GM, Coelho PG, Stappert CF, Clark EA, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of water storage time and composite cement thickness on fatigue of a glass-ceramic trilayer system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 84: 117-123.
30. ReliaSoft. The Weibull distribution and beta. (), 2010.
31. Van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Influence of inflammatory reactions vs. occlusal loading on peri-implant marginal bone level. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 130-135.
32. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 1977; 35: 297-303.
33. Helkimo E, Ingervall B. Bite force and functional state of the masticatory system in young men. Swed Dent J 1978; 2: 167-175.
34. Hagberg C. Assessment of bite force: a review. J Craniomandib Disord 1987; 1: 162-169.
35. Handbook A. Failure analysis and prevention, vol. 11. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, The Materials Information Society, 1992.
36. Scott WW Jr. Fractography, Vol. 12, Metals Handbook, 9th edn. Materials Park: ASM International, 1992.
37. Voort V. Conducting the failure examination (in metallic components). Metals Engng Q 1975; 15: 31-36.
38. Parrington RJ. Fractography of metals and plastics. In: Scott WW Jr, eds. Practical failure analysis. Vol. 2. Materials Park: ASM International, 2002; 16-46.
39. Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Mattiola A. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007; 2: 296-310.