Mortality rate comparison after switching from continuous to prolonged intermittent renal replacement for acute kidney injury in three intensive care units from different countries

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 2169-2175

  Marshall, Mark R ^a,b   Creamer, Julie M ^c   Foster, Michelle ^c   Ma, Tian M ^b   Mann, Susan L ^b   Fiaccadori, Enrico ^d   Maggiore, Umberto ^d   Richards, Brent ^c,e   Wilson, Vanessa L ^f   Williams, Anthony B ^a,b   Rankin, Alan P N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b MIDDLEMORE HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c GOLD COAST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^e BOND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f Fresenius Medical Care South Asia Pacific   (Australia)

Author keywords

acute kidney injury; continuous renal replacement therapy; extended daily dialysis; prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy; sustained low efficiency dialysis

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; APACHE; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEW ZEALAND; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROLONGED INTERMITTENT RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY; AGED; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; ITALY; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; PROGNOSIS; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 79960026116     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq694     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Fealy N. Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Resusc 2002; 4: 281-290.
2. Naka T, Baldwin I, Bellomo R et al. Prolonged daily intermittent renal replacement therapy in ICU patients by ICU nurses and ICU physicians. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27: 380-387. (Pubitemid 38812185)
3. Hombrouckx R, DeWachter D, Verdonck P. Kinetic modeling of "goslow" dialysis in acute renal failure. Home Hemodialysis International 1998; 2: 26-29.
4. Van Malderen P, De Rijck L, VermautMet al. Intermittent venovenous haemodiafiltration in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. EDTNA/ERCA J 1998; 24: 19-20. (Pubitemid 29003043)
5. Fiaccadori E, Maggiore U, Rotelli C et al. Removal of linezolid by conventional intermittent hemodialysis, sustained low-efficiency dialysis, or continuous venovenous hemofiltration in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 2437-2442. (Pubitemid 39648225)
6. Holt BG, White JJ, Kuthiala A et al. Sustained low-efficiency daily dialysis with hemofiltration for acute kidney injury in the presence of sepsis. Clin Nephrol 2008; 69: 40-46.
7. Marshall M, Golper T, Shaver M et al. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis for critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 777-785. (Pubitemid 32678922)
8. Berbece A, Richardson R. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis in the ICU: cost, anticoagulation, and solute removal. Kidney Int 2006; 70: 963-968. (Pubitemid 44285975)
9. Wu VC, Wang CH, Wang WJ et al. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis versus continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for postsurgical acute renal failure. Am J Surg 2009; Apr 16 [Epub ahead of print].
10. Golper T. Hybrid renal replacement therapies for critically ill patients. Contrib Nephrol 2004; 144: 278-283.
11. Marshall M, Golper T, Shaver M et al. Hybrid renal replacement modalities for the critically ill. Contrib Nephrol 2001; 132: 252-257.
12. Faulhaber-Walter R, Hafer C, Jahr N et al. The Hannover Dialysis Outcome study: comparison of standard versus intensified extended dialysis for treatment of patients with acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 2602-2603.
13. Kumar V, Craig M, Depner T et al. Extended daily dialysis: a new approach to renal replacement for acute renal failure in the intensive care unit. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 294-300. (Pubitemid 30485837)
14. Lonnemann G, Floege J, Kliem Vet al. Extended daily veno-venous high flux haemodialysis in patients with acute renal failure and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome using a single path batch dialysis system. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15: 1189-1193. (Pubitemid 30487796)
15. Marshall M, Ma T, Galler D et al. Sustained low-efficiency daily diafiltration (SLEDD-f) for critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy: towards an adequate therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 877-884. (Pubitemid 38455659)
16. Gashti CN, Salcedo S, Robinson Vet al. Accelerated venovenous hemofiltration: early technical and clinical experience. Am J Kidney Dis 2008; 51: 804-810. (Pubitemid 351626249)
17. Overberger P, Pesacreta M, Palevsky PM et al. Management of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a survey of practitioner prescribing practices. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007; 2: 623-630.
18. Ricci Z, Ronco C, D'Amico G et al. Practice patterns in the management of acute renal failure in the critically ill patient: an international survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 690-696. (Pubitemid 43372916)
19. Cole L, Bellomo R, Silvester W et al. A prospective, multicenter study of the epidemiology, management, and outcome of severe acute renal failure in a "closed" ICU system. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 191-196. (Pubitemid 30469819)
20. Bellomo R, Cole L, Reeves J et al. Renal replacement therapy in the ICU: the Australian experience. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 30: S80-S83. (Pubitemid 27465344)
21. Bellomo R, Stow PJ, Hart GK. Why is there such a difference in outcome between Australian intensive care units and others? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007; 20: 100-105. (Pubitemid 46594843)
22. RENAL Study Investigators. Renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: a practice survey. Crit Care Resusc 2008; 10: 225-230.
23. Vaslaki L, Karatson A, Voros P et al. Can sterile and pyrogen-free online substitution fluid be routinely delivered? A multicentric study on the microbiological safety of on-line haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000; 15 (Suppl 1): 74-78. (Pubitemid 30114214)
24. Weber C, GroetschW, Schlotter S et al. Novel online infusate-assisted dialysis system performs microbiologically safely. Artif Organs 2000; 24: 323-328. (Pubitemid 30353908)
25. Casino F, Marshall M. Simple and accurate quantification of dialysis in acute renal failure patients during either urea non-steady state or treatment with irregular or continuous schedules. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 1454-1466. (Pubitemid 38786739)
26. Fiaccadori E, Maggiore U, Parenti E et al. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) with prostacyclin in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 529-537. (Pubitemid 46189898)
27. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 1st edn. College Station, TX: Stata Press. 2005.
28. Brown H, Prescott R. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine. 1st edn. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999.
29. Hsaio C. Analysis of Panel Data. 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
30. Waikar SS, Curhan GC, Wald R et al. Declining mortality in patients with acute renal failure, 1988 to 2002. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 1143-1150.
31. Ympa YP, Sakr Y, Reinhart K et al. Has mortality from acute renal failure decreased? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Med 2005; 118: 827-832. (Pubitemid 41097456)
32. Sims M, Maxwell R, Bauld L et al. Short term impact of smoke-free legislation in England: retrospective analysis of hospital admissions for myocardial infarction. BMJ 2010; 340: c2161.
33. Gasparrini A, Gorini G, Barchielli A. On the relationship between smoking bans and incidence of acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Epidemiol 2009; 24: 597-602.
34. Kielstein J, Kretschmer U, Ernst T et al. Efficacy and cardiovascular tolerability of extended dialysis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled study. Am J Kidney Dis 2004; 43: 342-349. (Pubitemid 38146333)
35. Marshall MR, Golper TA, Shaver MJ et al. Urea kinetics during sustained low-efficiency dialysis in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: 556-570. (Pubitemid 34194632)
36. Kumar V, Yeun J, Depner T et al. Extended daily dialysis vs. continuous hemodialysis for ICU patients with acute renal failure: a two-year single center report. Int J Artif Organs 2004; 27: 371-379. (Pubitemid 38812184)
37. Ma T, Walker R, Eggleton K et al. Cost comparison between sustained low efficency daily dialysis/diafiltration (SLEDD) and continuous renal replacment therapy for ICU patients with ARF [Abstract]. Nephrology 2002; 7: A54.
38. Ricci Z, Ronco C. Dose and efficiency of renal replacement therapy: continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis versus slow extended daily dialysis. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: S229-S237. (Pubitemid 351483057)
39. Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Dialysing the patient with acute renal failure in the ICU: the emperor's clothes? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 2570-2573 (Pubitemid 32208362)