Nonselective motor-level changes associated with selective response inhibition: Evidence from response force measurements

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 813-819

  Ko, Yao Ting ^a   Miller, Jeff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Motor control

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960011714     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0090-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aron, A. R., & Verbruggen, F. (2008). Stop the presses: dissociating a selective from a global mechanism for stopping. Psychological Science, 19, 1146-1153.
2. Ashe, J. (1997). Force and the motor cortex. Behavioural Brain Research, 86, 1-15.
3. Band, G. P. H., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211.
4. Callaway, E., Halliday, R., Naylor, H., & Thouvenin, D. (1984). The latency of the average is not the average of the latencies. Psychophysiology, 21, 571.
5. Claffey, M. P., Sheldon, S., Stinear, C. M., Verbruggen, F., & Aron, A. R. (2010). Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations. Neuropsychologia, 48, 541-548.
6. Coxon, J. P., Stinear, C. M., & Byblow, W. D. (2007). Selective inhibition of movement. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 2480-2489.
7. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in non-selective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 498-511.
8. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G. D., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 164-182.
9. Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1278-1291.
10. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
11. Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 60-64.
12. Mattes, S., Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1997). Effects of response probability on response force in simple RT. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 405-420.
13. Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2008). Bimanual response grouping in dual-task paradigms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 999-1019.
14. Pashler, H. E. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
15. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 418-424.
16. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 835-854.