Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship

Scientometrics

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-36

  Teixeira, Aurora A C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Entrepreneurship; Invisible college

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959973952     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0445-3     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). References made and citations received by scientific articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 40-49.
2. Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Young, S. L. (2010). Debates in entrepreneurship: Opportunity formation and implications for the field of entrepreneurship. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, 5(Part 1), 23-45.
3. Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, 58(2), 64-71.
4. Borgman, C., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
5. Borgman, C. L., & Rice, R. E. (1992). The convergence of information science and communication: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 397-411.
6. Borokhovich, K. A., Bricker, R. J., & Simkins, B. J. (1994). The streams of financial research and their interrelationships: Evidence from the Social Sciences Citation Index. Financial Practice and Education, 4(2), 110-123.
7. Braunerhjelm, P., & Henrekson, M. (2009). Awarding entrepreneurship research: A presentation of the Global Award. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 809-814.
8. Campbell, K. (2011). Caring and daring entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(1), 37-47.
9. Casillas, J., & Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review, 20(2), 141-162.
10. Clements, K. W., & Wang, P. (2003). Who cites what? Economic Record, 79(245), 229-244.
11. Cooper, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship: The past, the present, the future. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. E. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (Vol. 1). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
12. Cornelius, B., Landström, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 375-398.
13. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Davidsson, P. (2008). The entrepreneurship research challenge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15. Davidsson, P., Low, M. B., & Wright, M. (2001). Editor's introduction: Low and MacMillan ten years on-Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 5-15.
16. Doreian, P., & Fararo, T. J. (1985). Structural equivalence in a journal network. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 28-37.
17. Etemad, H., & Lee, Y. (2003). The knowledge network of international entrepreneurship: Theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 20, 5-23.
18. Frey, B. (2006). How influential is economics? De Economist, 154(2), 295-311.
19. Fried, V. (2003). Defining a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 1-11.
20. Gamboa, E. C., & Brouthers, L. E. (2008). How international is entrepreneurship? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 551-558.
21. Gartner, W. B. (2001). Is there an elephant in entrepreneurship? Blind assumptions in theory development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 27-39.
22. Gartner, W. B., Davidsson, P., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Are you talking to me? The nature of community in entrepreneurship scholarship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 321-331.
23. Grégoire, D. A., Noël, M. X., Déry, R., & Béchard, J.-P. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 1981-2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 333-373.
24. Hagstrom, W. O. (1970). Factors related to the use of different modes of publishing research in four scientific fields. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25. Henrekson, M., & Lundström, A. (2009). The Global Award for entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 32, 1-14.
26. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165-187.
27. Katz, J. (2003). Core publications in entrepreneurship and related fields: A guide to getting published. Version 4. 1. 1. http://eweb.slu.edu/booklist.htm.
28. Katz, J. & Boal, K. (2006). Entrepreneurship journal rankings. Accessed April 19, 2011, from http://www.marketingtechie.com/articles/mtart20020307.pdf.
29. Leydesdorff, L. (2002). Indicators of structural change in the dynamics of science: Entropy statistics of the sc journal citation reports. Scientometrics, 53(1), 131-159.
30. Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Top-down decomposition of the journal citation report of the social science citation index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics, 60(2), 159-180.
31. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics, 76(1), 159-167.
32. Leydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S. E. (1993). The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the science citation index. Scientometrics, 26, 133-154.
33. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3), 693-713.
34. Lievrouw, L. A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16, 615-628.
35. Locke, J., & Perera, H. (2001). The intellectual structure of international accounting in the early 1990s. International Journal of Accounting, 36(2), 223-249.
36. Low, M. B., & MacMillan, I. C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139-161.
37. Meyer, G. D. (2011). The reinvention of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 1-8.
38. Price, D. J. de Solla (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Price, D. J. de Solla (1971). Some remarks on elitism in information and the invisible college phenomenon in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 22, 74-75.
40. Price, D. J. de Solla (1986). Little science, big science and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
41. Ratnatunga, J., & Romano, C. (1997). A citation classics' analysis of articles in contemporary small enterprise research. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 197-212.
42. Ravallion, M., & Wagstaff, A. (2011). On measuring scholarly influence by citations. Scientometrics, online first. doi: 10. 1007/s11192-011-0375-0.
43. Reader, D., & Watkins, D. (2006). The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: A co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 417-441.
44. Rigney, D., & Barnes, D. (1980). Patterns of interdisciplinary citation in the social sciences. Social Science Quarterly, 61(1), 114-127.
45. Romano, C., & Ratnatunga, J. (1996). A citation analysis of the impact of journals on contemporary small enterprise research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20(3), 7-21.
46. Sarasvathy, S. D., & Venkataraman, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship as method: Open questions for an entrepreneurial future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 113-135.
47. Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpää, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415.
48. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
49. Silva, E. G., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2008). Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(4), 273-362.
50. Steyaert, C., Hjorth, D., & Gartner, W. B. (2011). Six memos for a curious and imaginative future scholarship in entrepreneurship studies'. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(1), 1-7.
51. Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
52. Tuire, P., & Erno, P. (2001). Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relations within an educational research community: A Finnish case. Higher Education, 42, 493-513.
53. van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(6), 415-436.
54. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119-138). Oxford, UK: Elsevier/JAI Press.
55. Vieira, P. C., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2010). Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations. Scientometrics, 85(3), 627-646.
56. Wallace, D. P. (2007). Knowledge management: Historical and cross-disciplinary themes. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
57. Waller, J. H. (2006). Evaluating scholarly communication at the subdisciplinary level. Collection Management, 30(2), 45-57.
58. Watkins, D., & Reader, D. (2004), Identifying current trends in entrepreneurship research: A new approach. Accessed April 2011, from http://www.kmu.unisg.ch/rencontres/RENC2004/Topics/Watkins_Renc_2004_Topic_A.pdf.
59. Werner, S., & Brouthers, L. E. (2002). How international is management? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 583-591.
60. Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1-9.
61. Zahra, S. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443-452.
62. Zitt, M. (2006). Scientometric indicators: A few challenges. Data mine-clearing, knowledge flows measurements, diversity issues, invited plenary talk. In Proceedings international workshop on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics & seventh COLLNET meeting, Nancy (France). http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006306/.
63. Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152-168.
64. Zuccala, A., & van den Besselaar, P. (2009). Mapping review networks: Exploring research community roles and contributions. Scientometrics, 81(1), 111-122.