Study of neurinomas with ultrasound contrast media: Review of a case series to identify characteristic imaging patterns;Lo studio dei neurinomi con mezzo di contrasto ecografico: valutazione dei patterns caratteristici di riconoscimento diagnostico

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 634-643

  De Marchi, A ^a   Pozza, S ^a   Sutera, R ^b   Brach Del Prever, E M ^a   Petraz, M ^a   Sena, C ^a   Linari, A ^c   Faletti, C ^a  

^a CTO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^c ASO OIRM S Anna   (Italy)

Author keywords

Imaging contrast media; Power Doppler; Schwannoma; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST AGENT BR1; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; PHOSPHOLIPID; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURILEMOMA; PERIPHERAL NERVE TUMOR; VASCULARIZATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURILEMMOMA; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM NEOPLASMS; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959973299     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0653-1     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. De Marchi A, De Petro P, Pozza S et al (2004) Apparato muscoloscheletrico. In: Rossi S, Calliada F, Martegani A (eds) Mezzi di contrasto in ecografia. Testo atlante. Poletto editore, Gudo Visconti, Milano, pp 256-261
2. F.D. Beaman M.J. Kransdorf D.M. Menke 2004 Schwannoma: radiologicpathologic correlation Radiographics 24 1477 1481 15371621 10.1148/rg.245045001
3. V. Simonovsky 1997 Peripheral nerve schwannoma preoperatively diagnosed by sonography: report of three cases and discussion Eur J Radiol 25 47 51 9248799 10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01092-3 1:STN:280:DyaK2szpt1SmtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27285802)
4. I. Beggs 1997 Pictorial review: imaging of peripheral nerve tumours Clin Radiol 52 8 17 9022574 10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80299-1 1:STN:280: DyaK2s7nsV2itg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27067742)
5. C. Martinoli S. Bianchi M. Dahmane, et al. 2002 Ultrasound of tendons and nerves Eur Radiol 12 44 55 11868073 10.1007/s00330-001-1161-9 (Pubitemid 36940023)
6. De Marchi A, Verga L, Pozza S et al (2005) I tumori dei tessuti molli. In: Faletti C, Masciocchi C (eds) Trattato di diagnostica per immagini nella patologia muscoloschelerica. UTET, Torino, pp 141-159
7. Monetti (2000) Ecografia muscolo tendinea. Imaging integrato. Idelson-Gnocchi, Napoli
8. Y.L. Kuo W.J. Yao H.Y. Chiu 2005 Role of sonography in the preoperative assessment of neurilemmoma J Clin Ultrasound 33 87 89 15674832 10.1002/jcu.20085 (Pubitemid 40194418)
9. I. Beggs 1999 Sonographic appearances of nerve tumours J Clin Ultrasound 27 363 368 10440783 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199909)27:7<363::AID-JCU1>3.0. CO;2-7 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzmvF2hsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29387698)
10. N. Bendix C. Wolf H. Gruber G. Bodner 2005 Pictorial essay: Ultrasound of tumours and tumour-like lesions of peripheral nerves Ultraschall Med 26 318 324 16123927 10.1055/s-2005-858374 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2Mvls1Gjtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41232715)
11. P.N. Burns S.R. Wilson 2006 Microbubble contrast for radiological imaging: principles Ultrasound Q 22 5 13 16641788 (Pubitemid 44510222)
12. P.N. Burns J. Powers U.D. Hope F.V.T. Simpson 1996 Harmonic imaging: principles and preliminary results Angiology 47 S63 S74
13. P. Ricci A. Laghi V. Cantisani, et al. 2005 Contrast-enhanced sonography with SonoVue: enhancement patterns of benign focal liver lesions and correlation with dynamic gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI AJR Am J Roentgenol 184 821 827 15728603 (Pubitemid 43899507)
14. F. Piscaglia R. Lencioni E. Sagrini, et al. 2010 Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound Ultrasound Med Biol 36 531 550 20350680 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.01.004
15. P.G. Sorelli D.O. Cosgrove W.E. Svensson, et al. 2010 Can contrast-enhanced sonography distinguish benign from malignant breast masses? J Clin Ultrasound 38 177 181 20146214 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c3lslKnsA%3D%3D
16. N. Amoretti A. Grimaud E. Hovorka, et al. 2006 Peripheral neurogenic tumours: is the use of different types of imaging diagnostically useful? Clinical Imaging 30 201 205 16632157 10.1016/j.clinimag.2006.01.023 (Pubitemid 44316591)
17. R. Schlief A. Bauer 1996 Ultrasound contrast media. New perspectives in ultrasound diagnosis Radiologe 36 51 57 8820372 10.1007/s001170050039 1:STN:280:DyaK28vhslGrsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26051537)
18. P. Ricci V. Cantisani L. Ballesio, et al. 2007 Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrastenhanced ultrasuond vs MRI Ultrashall Med 28 57 62 10.1055/s-2006-927226 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7os1Kqug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46696977)
19. A. De Marchi P. De Petro C. Faletti, et al. 2003 Echo color power Doppler with contrast medium to evaluate vascularization in lesion of the soft tissue of the limbs Chir Organi Mov 88 225 231 14735833
20. C. Bartolozzi L. Crocetti M.C. Della Pinna 2007 How to differentiate liver lesions in cirrhosis JBR-BTR 90 475 481 18376759 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1c3hvVygtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 351302437)
21. S.H. Kook H.G. Kwag 2003 Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions J Clin Ultrasound 31 227 238 12767017 10.1002/jcu.10172 (Pubitemid 36583446)
22. F. Calliada R. Campani O. Bottinelli, et al. 1998 Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles Eur J Radiol 27 Suppl2 S157 S160 9652516 10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00057-6 (Pubitemid 28270589)
23. C.M. Sofka D. Lin R.S. Adler 2005 Advantages of colour B-mode imaging with contrast optimization in sonography of low-contrast musculoskeletal lesion and structures in the foot and ankle J Ultrasound Med 24 215 218 15661953