The shield protection technique for microvascular anastomoses

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Mücke, Thomas ^a   Ritschl, Lucas ^a   Mitchell, David A ^b   Kanatas, Anastasios ^b   Wolff, Klaus Dietrich ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b MID YORKSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; ANIMAL; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MICROVASCULATURE; RAT; VASCULAR SURGERY;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MICROSURGERY; MICROVESSELS; RATS; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 79959962975     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318217448c     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Webb WR, Peacock EE Jr. Success of a properly planned surgical procedure is dependent on manual skill. Ann Surg. 1980;191:388-390.
2. Kao HK, Chang KP, Wei FC, Cheng MH. Comparison of the medial sural artery perforator flap with the radial forearm flap for head and neck reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124:1125-1132.
3. Cobbett J. Small vessel anastomosis: A comparison of suture techniques. Br J Plast Surg. 1967;20:16-20.
4. Hayhurst JW, O'Brien BM. An experimental study of microvascular technique, patency rates and related factors. Br J Plast Surg. 1975;28:128-132.
5. Khouri RK. Avoiding free flap failure. Clin Plast Surg. 1992; 19:773-781.