Biomass availability and process selection for an integrated forest biorefinary

Pulp and Paper Canada

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 19-26

  Ghezzaz, Hakim ^a   Stuart, Paul ^a  

^a Université Laval   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomass assessment; Biomass availability; Biomass quality; Forest biorefinery; Integrated pulp and paper mill; Techno economic assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS AVAILABILITY; BIOMASS QUALITY; FOREST BIOREFINERY; INTEGRATED PULP AND PAPER MILL; TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT;

BIOCONVERSION; EARNINGS; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; INTEGRATION; PAPER AND PULP MILLS; PHENOLIC RESINS; PHENOLS; PROFITABILITY; PULP; PULP MANUFACTURE; PYROLYSIS; RATING; REFINING;

BIOMASS;

BIOMASS; ETHANOL; INTEGRATION; PAPER MILLS; PHENOLS; POLYPHENOLICS; PROFITABILITY; PULP MILLS; PYROLYSIS; RATING; REFINING;

EID: 79959943783     PISSN: 03164004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. THORP, B., Biorefinery offers industry leaders business model for major change. Pulp & Paper, 2005. 79(11): p. 35-39.
2. STUART, P., The forest biorefinery Survival strategy for Canada's pulp and paper sector? Pulp and Paper Canada, 2006.107(6): p. 13-16. (Pubitemid 44226097)
3. VAN HEININGEN, A, Converting a kraft pulp mill into an integrated forest biorefinery. Pulp and Paper Canada, 2006.107(6): p. 38-43. (Pubitemid 44212368)
4. WISING, U. and P. STUART, Identifying the Canadian forest biorefinery. Pulp and Paper Canada, 2006. 107(6): p. 25-30. (Pubitemid 44218482)
5. HYTONEN, E. and P.R STUART, Integrating bioethanol production into a Kraft pulp mill - Technology assessment. Pulp and Paper Canada, 2009.110 (5/6): p. 25-31.
6. EGGEMAN, T. and R.T. ELANDER, Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresource Technology, 2005. 96(18 SPEC. ISS.): p. 2019-2025. (Pubitemid 41169796)
7. WYMAN, C.E., et al, Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. Biotechnology Progress, 2009. 25(2): p. 333-339.
8. MABEE, W.E. and J.N. SADDLER, The potential of bioconversion to produce fuels and chemicals. Pulp and Paper Canada, 2006. 107 (6): p. 34-37. (Pubitemid 44218483)
9. NGUYEN, M.H. and RG.H. PRINCE. A simple rule for bioenergy conversion plant size optimisation: Bioethanol from sugar cane and sweet sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1996.10 (5/6): p.361-365. (Pubitemid 27099054)
10. JACK, M.W., Scaling laws and technology develop-ment strategies for biorefineries and bioenergy plants. Bioresource Technology, 2009.100(24): p. 6324-6330.
11. WRIGHT, M. and RC. BROWN, Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. Biofuels, Byproducts and Biorefining, 2007. 1(3): p. 191-200.
12. WERPY, T.A., J.E. HOLLADAY, and J. J.F. WHITE, Top Value Added Chemicals From Biomass: I. Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas. 2004, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).
13. HOLLADAY, J.E., et al., Top Value-Added Chemicals from Biomass - Volume II - Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Biorefinery Lignin. 2007, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).
14. COHEN, J., et al., Critical analysis of emerging forest biorefinery (FBR) technologies for ethanol production. Pulp and Paper Canada, 2010. 111(3): p. 24-30.
15. Biomass Inventory Mapping and Analysis Tool. Available from: http://atlas.agr.gc.ca/agmaf/.
16. Quebec's Forest Resources and Industry- A statistical report 2009 edition. Available from: http://www.mrnfgouv.qc.ca/english/publications/forest/ publications/statistics/.
17. ARTHUR D. LITTLE, I., Aggressive Growth in the Use of Bio-derived Energy and Products in the United States by 2010. 2001.
18. ADEN, A., et al., Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. 2002, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
19. WOOLEY, R, et al., Lignocellulosic Biomass to Eth-anol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis Current and Futuristic Scenarios. 1999, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
20. KOOTSTRA, A.M.J., et al., Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2009. 46(2): p. 126-131.
21. PAN, X., et al., Biorefining of softwoods using ethanol organosolv pulping: Preliminary evaluation of process streams for manufacture of fuel-grade ethanol and co-products. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2005. 90(4): p. 473-481. (Pubitemid 40779197)
22. DELMAS, M. and B. BENJELLOUN-MLAYAH. The first biomass refinery for the production of pulp, lig-nins and C5 sugars at industrial scale from annual plants and hard wood. 62nd Appita Annual Conference and Exhibition.2008: p. 41-45.
23. JONSSON, A. S. and O. WALLBERG, Cost estimates of kraft lignin recovery by ultrafiltration. Desalination, 2009. 237(1-3): p. 254-267.
24. RINGER, M, V PUTSCHE, and J. SCAHILL, Large-Scale Pyrolysis Oil Production: A Technology Assessment and Economic Analysis. 2006, National National Renewable Laboratory (NREL).
25. TIJMENSEN, M.J.A., et al., Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2002. 23(2): p. 129-152. (Pubitemid 34788921)
26. PHILLIPS, S., et al., Thermochemical Ethanol via Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis of Lignocellulosic Biomass. 2007, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
27. PETERS, M.S., K.D. TIMMERHAUS, and RE. WEST, Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. 5th ed. ed. 2003, Boston: MacGraw-Hill.
28. DYSERT, L.R, Sharpen Your Cost Estimating Skills. Cost Engineering, 2003. 45(6): p. 22-30.