Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 253-262

  Jewell, Mark L ^{a,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Baxter, Richard A ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Cox, Sue Ellen ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Donofrio, Lisa M ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Dover, Jeffrey S ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Glogau, Richard G ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Kane, Michael A ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Weiss, Robert A ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Martin, Patrick ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}   Schlessinger, Joel ^{b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k}  

^a Jewell Plastic Surgery Center   (United States)

^b Oregon Health Science University ^*

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Aesthetic Solutions ^*  (United States)

^e Aesthetic Solutions   (United States)

^f Savin Center   (United States)

^g SkinCare Physicians   (United States)

^h PRIVATE PRACTICE   (United States)

ⁱ MD Laser Skin and Vein Institute   (United States)

^j Medicis Technologies Corporation   (United States)

^k Advanced Skin Research Center   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND ABLATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959939264     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182174278     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2010 Report of the 2009 Statistics: National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics. Available at: http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Newsand-Resources/2009-Statistics.html. Accessed May 5, 2011.
2. Triana L, Triana C, Barbato C, Zambrano M. Liposuction: 25 years of experience in 26,259 patients using different devices. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29:509-512.
3. Avram MM, Harry RS. Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:703-708.
4. Dover J, Burns J, Coleman S, et al. A prospective clinical study of noninvasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction: Interim report of available subject data. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:706.
5. Manuskiatti W, Wachirakaphan C, Lektrakul N, Varothai S. Circumference reduction and cellulite treatment with a Tri-Pollar radiofrequency device: A pilot study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23:820-827.
6. Sadick NS, Mulholland RS. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cellulite treatment using the combination of optical and RF energies for subcutaneous tissue heating. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6:187-190. (Pubitemid 40547023)
7. Caruso-Davis MK, Guillot TS, Podichetty VK, et al. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for body contouring and spot fat reduction. Obes Surg. Epublished ahead of print April 15, 2010.
8. Jackson RF, Dedo DD, Roche GC, Turok DI, Maloney RJ. Low-level laser therapy as a non-invasive approach for body contouring: A randomized, controlled study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41:799-809.
9. Khan MH, Victor F, Rao B, Sadick NS. Treatment of cellulite: Part II. Advances and controversies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:373-384; quiz 385-386.
10. Matarasso A, Pfeifer TM. Mesotherapy and injection lipolysis. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:181-192, v; discussion 193.
11. Ascher B. Safety and efficacy of UltraShape Contour I treatments to improve the appearance of body contours: Multiple treatments in shorter intervals. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30: 217-224.
12. Moreno-Moraga J, Valero-Altés T, Riquelme AM, Isarria-Marcosy MI, de la Torre JR. Body contouring by non-invasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39: 315-323. (Pubitemid 46717531)
13. Dubinsky TJ, Cuevas C, Dighe MK, Kolokythas O, Hwang JH. High-intensity focused ultrasound: Current potential and oncologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:191-199.
14. Kennedy JE, Ter Haar GR, Cranston D. High intensity focused ultrasound: Surgery of the future? Br J Radiol. 2003; 76:590-599.
15. Fatemi A. High-intensity focused ultrasound effectively reduces adipose tissue. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2009;28:257-262.
16. Fatemi A, Kane MA. High-intensity focused ultrasound effectively reduces waist circumference by ablating adipose tissue from the abdomen and flanks: A retrospective case series. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010;34:577-582.
17. Bernritter JA, Johnson JL, Woodard SL. Validation of a novel waist circumference measurement method. Plast Surg Nurs. 2011;31:9-15.
18. Cox SE, Martin P, Lawrence I, et al. Safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body contouring: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Paper presented at: American Society for Dermatologic Surgery/American Society of Cosmetic Dermatology and Aesthetic Surgery Joint Annual Meeting; October 21-24, 2010; Chicago, Ill.
19. Quistgaard JU, Desilets C, Martin P. High intensity focused ultrasound. Available at: http://digital.miinews.com/publication/?i-34631&page-1. Accessed July 12, 2010.