The search queries that took Australian Internet users to Wikipedia

Information Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Waller, Vivienne ^a  

^a SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959909790     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.
2. Badke, W. (2008). What to do with Wikipedia. Online, 32(2). Retrieved 2 February 2010 from http://www.infotoday.com/online/mar08/Badke.shtml Accessed: 2011-02-10. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPFQHnru)
3. Broder, A. (2002). A taxonomy of Web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2), 3-10.
4. Chesney, T. (2006). An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility. First Monday, 11(11). Retrieved 15 October 2009 from http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1413/1331 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPW5JDvK)
5. Duguid, P. (2006). Limits of self-organization: peer production and "laws of quality". First Monday, 11(10). Retrieved 7 February 2010 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1405/1323 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPWzoFZR)
6. Dutton, W. H. & Helsper, E. J. (2007). The Internet in Britain: 2007. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
7. Dutton, W. H., Helsper, E. J. & Gerber, M. M. (2009). The Internet in Britain: 2009. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
8. Ehmann, K., Large, A. & Beheshti, J. (2008). Collaboration in context: comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Wikipedia. First Monday,13(10), Retrieved 15 October 2009 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2217/2034 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPJpdV71)
9. Eisenberg, M. B. (2009). How today's college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3). Retrieved 2 February 2010 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2830/2476 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPJvJS9r)
10. Elvebakk, B. (2008). Philosophy democratized? A comparision between Wikipedia and two other Web-based philosophy resources. First Monday, 13(2). Retrieved 7 September 2009 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2091/1938 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPKuYlkl)
11. Ewing, S., Thomas, J. & Schiessl, J. (2008). CCi Digital Futures report: the Internet in Australia. Melbourne: ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation, Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology.
12. Fallows, D. (2008). Search engine users. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
13. Ford, N., Eaglestone, B., Madden, A., & Whittle, M. (2008). Web searching by the 'general public': an individual differences perspective. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 632-667.
14. Fox, S. & Jones, S. (2009). The social life of health information. Washington, D. C: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
15. Gans, H. (1999). High culture and popular culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.
16. Giles, J. (2005). Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature, 438(15), 900-901.
17. Giles, J. (2006). Wikipedia rival calls in the experts. Nature, 443(5), 493.
18. Gorman, G. E. (2007). A tale of information ethics and encyclopaedias; or, is Wikipedia just another internet scam? Online Information Review, 31(3), 273-276.
19. Halavais, A, & Lackaff, D. (2008). An analysis of topical coverage of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 429-440.
20. Hansen, S., Berentea, N. & Lyytinen, K. (2009). Wikipedia, critical social theory, and the possibility of rational discourse. The Information Society, 25(1), 38-59.
21. Holloway, T., Bozicevic, M. & Borner, K. (2007). Analysing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity, 12(3), 30-40.
22. Horrigan, J. B. (2006). The Internet as a resource for news and information about science. Washington, D. C: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
23. iProspect (2008). iProspect blended search results study. Retrieved 9 March 2010, from http://www.iprospect.com/about/researchstudy_2008_blendedsearchresults.htm (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPKzShvw)
24. Jansen, B. & Spink, A. (2006). How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248-263.
25. Jansen, B. J. (2006). Search log analysis: what it is, what's been done, how to do it. Library & Information Science Research, 28, 407-432.
26. Jansen, B. J., Booth, D. L & Spink, A. (2008). Determining the informational, navigational and transactional intent of Web queries. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1251-1266.
27. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: how today's Internet is killing our culture. London: Nicholas Brealey.
28. Knight, S. A. & Spink, A. (2008). Toward a Web search information behavior model. In A. Spink and M. Zimmer, (Eds.), Web search: multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 209-234). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29. Lally, A. M. & Dunford, C. E. (2007). Using Wikipedia to extend digital collections. D-Lib Magazine, 13(5/6). Retrieved 14 November 2009 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may07/lally/05lally.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPL3f4Zv)
30. Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2189-2202.
31. Lipczynska, S. (2005). Power to the people: the case for Wikipedia. Reference Reviews, 19(2), 6-7.
32. Luyt, B., Zainal, C. Z. B. C., Mayo, O. V. P. & Yun, T. S. (2008). Young people's perceptions and usage of Wikipedia. Information Research, 13(4). Available at http://informationr.net/ir/13-4/paper377.html (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPX9drJQ)
33. McGrady, R. (2009). Gaming against the greater good. First Monday, 14(2). Retrieved 14 November 2009 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2215/2091 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLERBPP)
34. De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Cellentani, D., Hawk, J., Jenkins, L. & Wilson, A. (2005). Perceptions of libraries and information resources: a report to the OCLC membership. Dublin, OH: OCLC. Available at http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLIm5v8)
35. Park, S. (2009). Analysis of characteristics and trends of Web queries submitted to NAVER, a major Korean search engine. Library and Information Science Research, 31, 126-133.
36. Portal: contents/categories. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved 3 March 2010 from http://en. Wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Contents/Categorical_index (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLN7bKo)
37. Pressley, L. & McCallum, C. J. (2008). Putting the library in Wikipedia. Online, 32(5). Available at http://www.infotoday.com/online/sep08/Pressley_McCallum.shtml (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLRUOJa)
38. Rainie, L. & Tancer, B. (2007). Wikipedia users. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved 3 July 2009 from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Wikipedia-users.aspx (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLVhEbT)
39. Rose, D. E. & Levinson, D. (2004). Understanding user goals in Web search. In WWW 2004: proceedings of the thirteenth international World Wide Web conference: May 17-22 (pp. 13-19). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
40. Royal, C. & Kapila, D. (2009). What's on Wikipedia, and what's not...?: assessing completeness of information. Social Science Computer Review, 27(1), 138-148.
41. Segev, E. & Ahituv, N. (2010). Popular searches in Google and Yahoo!: a "digital divide" in information uses? The Information Society, 26(1), 17-37.
42. Spinellis, D. & Louridas, P. (2008). The collaborative organization of knowledge. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 68-73.
43. Spink, A. & Jansen, B. J. (2004). Web search: public searching of the Web. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
44. Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, B.J. and Saracevic, T. (2001). Searching the Web: the public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 52(3), 226-234.
45. Spoerri, A. (2007). What is popular on Wikipedia and why? First Monday, 12(4). Retrieved 3 July 2009 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1765/1645 (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLa6rKe)
46. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
47. Tann, C. & Sanderson, M. (2009). Are Web-based informational queries changing? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1290-1293.
48. Waller, V. (2009). What do the public search for on the catalogue of the State Library of Victoria? Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 40(4), 266-285.
49. Wells, A. (2008). A portrait of early Internet adopters: why people first went online-and why they stayed. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved 5 March 2010 from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Early_Adopters.pdf.pdf (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPM5usMj)
50. Wikipedia study fatally flawed (2006, March 24). BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2011 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4840340.stm (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5wPLjYS7o)