Assessing enquiry-based learning: Developing objective criteria from personal knowledge

Curriculum Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 253-270

  Small, Tim ^a  

^a Bristol   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

assessment; assessment criteria; creativity; enquiry based learning; learning power; learning to learn; personalised learning; self assessment; subjectivity; values and learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959907546     PISSN: 09585176     EISSN: 14693704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585170903195878     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams A., New directions in English teaching Falmer Press London 1982
2. Bell, R., 1985. Four readers reading: A study of how children respond to poetry M.Ed. dissertation, University of Southampton. Reprinted in Young readers responding to poems by M. Benton. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
3. Benton, M., 1982. “ How authors write … how children write: Towards a rationale for creative writing ”. In New directions in English teaching, Edited by: Adams, A., 129–161. London: Falmer Press.
4. Benton, M., 1989. Young readers responding to poems, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Brownhill, R. J., 1981. Objectivity and subjectivity in Polanyi's personal knowledge. New Universities Quarterly, 5 (3) (Summer)
6. Cooper C., R. Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature Ablex 1985
7. Deakin Crick, R., 2006. Learning power in practice: A guide for teachers, London: Sage.
8. Deakin Crick, R., 2009. Inquiry-based learning: Reconciling the personal with the public in a democratic and archaeological pedagogy. The Curriculum Journal, 20 (1): 73–91.
9. Deakin Crick, R., Broadfoot, P., and Claxton, G., 2004. Developing an Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory: The ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11 (3): 247–272.
10. Fish, S., 1980. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretative communities, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
11. Fitzpatrick, J., 1982. Subjectivity and objectivity: Polanyi and Lonergan. New Universities Quarterly, 36 (2) (Spring)
12. Jackson, P. W., and Messick, S., 1965. The person, the product, the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33: 1–9. Reprinted in Personality, growth and learning, Open University Press, 1971, 75–92. Harlow: Longman
13. Kintgen, E. R., 1985. “ Studying the perception of poetry ”. In Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature, Edited by: Cooper, C. R., 128–150. New York: Ablex.
14. Miliband, D., Speech to National College for School Leadership Annual Network Conference. October.
15. Millner, N., Small, T., and Deakin Crick, R., 2006. Learning by accident, Bristol: ViTaL Partnerships.
16. Polanyi, M., 1959. The study of man, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Polanyi, M., 1962. Personal knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18. Polanyi, M., 1967. The tacit dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19. Richards, I. A., 1929. Practical criticism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20. QCA. 2009. Why is creativity so important? Page on website of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority Piccadilly, London, June 2009: http://curriculum.qca.org.uk/key-stages-1-and-2/learning-across-the-curriculum/creativity/whyiscreativitysoimportant/index.aspx
21. Rosenblatt, L. M., 1968. Literature as exploration, London: Heinemann. (reprinted 1970)
22. Rosenblatt, L. M., 1978. The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23. Rosenblatt, L. M., 1985. “ The transactional theory of the literary work: Implications for research ”. In Researching response to literature and the teaching of literature, Edited by: Cooper, C. R., Ablex.
24. Sebba, J., Deakin Crick, R., Yu, G., Lawson, H., Harlen, W., and Durant, K., 2008. Systematic review of research evidence of the impact on students in secondary schools of self and peer assessment Technical report in Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of education, University of London
25. Small, T., 1990. Assessing responses to poetry MEd dissertation, University of Exeter