Iron oxide nanoparticle-containing microbubble composites as contrast agents for MR and ultrasound dual-modality imaging

Biomaterials

Volumn 32, Issue 26, 2011, Pages 6155-6163

  Liu, Zhe ^a   Lammers, Twan ^a   Ehling, Josef ^a,b   Fokong, Stanley ^a   Bornemann, Jörg ^b   Kiessling, Fabian ^a   Gätjens, Jessica ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast agent; Molecular imaging; MRI (magnetic resonance imaging); Nanoparticle; Polymerization

Indexed keywords

BUTYL CYANOACRYLATE; CLINICAL APPLICATION; CONTRAST AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC MODALITY; DUAL-MODALITY IMAGING; GENE DELIVERY; IMAGING AGENT; IMAGING PROBE; IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS; IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; MICRO-BUBBLE; MICROBUBBLES; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MR IMAGING; MRI (MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING); MULTI-MODAL; OIL-IN-WATER; ONE POT; PROOF OF PRINCIPLES; RELAXATION RATES; STRONG CONTRAST; ULTRASOUND IMAGING;

EMULSIFICATION; EMULSION POLYMERIZATION; GENE THERAPY; GENE TRANSFER; HYBRID MATERIALS; IRON; IRON OXIDES; NANOMAGNETICS; NANOPARTICLES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; POLYMERS; RESONANCE; ULTRASONICS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; ENBUCRILATE; NANOSHELL; OIL; POLYMER; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; WATER;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENCAPSULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYBRID; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROBUBBLE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ONE POT EMULSION POLYMERIZATION; ONE POT SYNTHESIS; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND DUAL MODALITY IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIA; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICROBUBBLES; NANOPARTICLES; POLYMERS;

EID: 79959906653     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Weissleder R., Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 2001, 219:316-333.
2. Massoud T.F., Gambhir S.S. Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev 2003, 17:545-580.
3. Ferrara K., Pollard R., Borden M. Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007, 9:415-447.
4. Pitt W.G., Husseini G.A., Staples B.J. Ultrasonic drug delivery - a general review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2004, 1:37-56.
5. Ferrara K.W., Borden M.A., Zhang H. Lipid-Shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. Acc Chem Res 2009, 42:881-892.
6. Klibanov A.L. Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. Bioconjug Chem 2005, 16:9-17.
7. Tinkov S., Bekeredjian R., Winter G., Coester C. Microbubbles as ultrasound triggered drug carriers. J Pharm Sci 2009, 98:1935-1961.
8. Galperin A., Margel S. Synthesis and characterization of radiopaque magnetic core-shell nanoparticles for X-ray imaging applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007, 83B:490-498.
9. Bartling S., Budjan J., Aviv H., Haneder S., Kraenzlin B., Michaely H., et al. First multimodal embolization particles visible on X-ray/computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2011, 46:178-186.
10. Aviv H., Bartling S., Budjan J., Margel S. Synthesis and characterization of dual modality (CT/MRI) core-shell microparticles for embolization purposes. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:1600-1607.
11. Norton S.J., Vo-Dinh T. Imaging the distribution of magnetic nanoparticles with ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007, 26:660-665.
12. Scherer F., Anton M., Schillinger U., Henke J., Bergermann C., Krüger A., et al. Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo. Gene Ther 2002, 9:102-109.
13. Oh J., Feldman M.D., Kim J., Condit C., Emelianov S., Milner T.E. Detection of magnetic nanoparticles in tissue using magneto-motive ultrasound. Nanotechnology 2006, 17:4183-4190.
14. Alexander A.L., McCreery T.T., Barrette T.R., Gmitro A.F., Unger E.C. Microbubbles as novel pressure-sensitive MR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1996, 35:801-806.
15. Cheung J.S., Chow A.M., Guo H., Wu E.X. Microbubbles as a novel contrast agent for brain MRI. Neuroimage 2009, 46:658-664.
16. Stride E., Porter C., Prieto A.G., Pankhurst Q. Enhancement of microbubble mediated gene delivery by simultaneous exposure to ultrasonic and magnetic fields. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:861-868.
17. Liu Z.Y., Wang Y., Liang C.H., Li X.H., Wang G.Y., Liu H.G., et al. In vitro labeling of mesenchymal stem cells with superparamagnetic iron oxide by means of microbubble-enhanced US exposure: initial experience. Radiology 2009, 253:153-159.
18. Jolesz F.A. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Annu Rev Med 2009, 60:417-430.
19. Hynynen K. MRI-guided focused ultrasound treatments. Ultrasonics 2010, 50:221-229.
20. Laurent S., Boutry S., Mahieu I., Vander Elst V., Muller R.N. Iron oxide based MR contrast agents: from chemistry to cell labeling. Curr Med Chem 2009, 16:4712-4727.
21. Soenen S.J., Hodenius M., De Cuyper M. Magnetoliposomes: versatile innovative nanocolloids for use in biotechnology and biomedicine. Nanomedicine 2009, 4:177-191.
22. Kiessling F., Huppert J., Palmowski M. Functional and molecular ultrasound imaging: concepts and contrast agents. Curr Med Chem 2009, 16:627-642.
23. Cavalieri F., Finelli I., Tortora M., Mozetic P., Chiessi E., Polizio F., et al. Polymer microbubbles as diagnostic and therapeutic gas delivery device. Chem Mater 2008, 20:3254-3258.
24. Zhang Z., Liao G., Nagai T., Hou S. Mitoxantrone polybutyl cyanoacrylate nanoparticles as an anti-neoplastic targeting drug delivery system. Int J Pharm 1996, 139:1-8.
25. Kusonwiriyawong C., Lipipun V., Zhang Q., Ritthidej G.C. Poly(α-butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles for intracellular delivery of protein: physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity study and cellular uptake in dendritic cells. J Control Release 2008, 132:e6-8.
26. Remge P., Unger R.E., Oltrogge J.B., Zenker D., Begley D., Kreuter J., et al. Polysorbate-80 coating enhances uptake of polybutylcyanoacrylate (PBCA)-nanoparticles by human and bovine primary brain capillary endothelial cells. Eur J Neurosci 2000, 12:1931-1940.
27. Zimmer A., Kreuter J., Robinson J.R. Studies on the transport pathway of PBCA nanoparticles in ocular tissues. J Microencapsul 1991, 8:497-504.
28. Yang F., Li Y., Chen Z., Zhang Y., Wu J., Gu N. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-embedded encapsulated microbubbles as dual contrast agents of magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging. Biomaterials 2009, 30:3882-3890.
29. Ke H., Xing Z.W., Zhao B., Wang J.R., Liu J.B., Guo C.X., et al. Quantum-dot-modified microbubbles with Bi-mode imaging capabilities. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:1-8.
30. Cavalieri F., Ashokkumar M., Grieser F., Caruso F. Ultrasonic synthesis of stable, functional lysozyme microbubbles. Langmuir 2008, 24:10078-10083.
31. Park J.I., Jagadeesan D., Williams R., Oakden W., Chung S., Stanisz G.J., et al. Microbubbles loaded with nanoparticles: a route to multiple imaging modalities. ACS Nano 2010, 4:6579-6586.
32. Palmowski M., Huppert J., Ladewig G., Hauff P., Reinhardt M., Mueller M.M., et al. Molecular profiling of angiogenesis with targeted ultrasound imaging: early assessment of antiangiogenic therapy effects. Mol Cancer Ther 2008, 7:101-109.
33. Palmowski M., Peschke P., Huppert J., Hauff P., Reinhardt M., Maurer M., et al. Molecular ultrasound imaging of early vascular response in prostate tumors irradiated with carbon ions. Neoplasia 2009, 11:856-863.
34. Khalafalla S.E., Reimers G.W. Preparation of dilution-stable aqueous magnetic fluids. IEEE Trans Magn 1980, 16:178-183.
35. Behan N., Birkinshaw C., Clarke N. Poly n-butyl cyanoacrylate nanoparticles: a mechanistic study of polymerisation and particle formation. Biomaterials 2001, 22:1335-1344.
36. Olbrich C., Hauff P., Scholle F., Schmidt W., Bakowsky U., Briel A., et al. The in vitro stability of air-filled polybutylcyanoacrylate microparticles. Biomaterials 2006, 27:3549-3559.
37. Feshitan J.A., Chen C.C., Kwan J.J., Borden M.A. Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. J Colloid Interface Sci 2009, 329:316-324.
38. Lammers T., Kiessling F., Hennink W.E., Storm G. Nanotheranostics and image-guided drug delivery: current concepts and future directions. Mol Pharm 2010, 7:1899-1912.
39. Deckers R., Rome C., Moonen C.T.W. The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance in local drug delivery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 27:400-409.