Environmental conditions affecting spiders in grasslands at the lower reach of the River Tisza in Hungary

Entomologica Fennica

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 29-38

  Gallé, Róbert ^a   Vesztergom, Norbert ^a   Somogyi, Tamás ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARANEAE;

EID: 79959885853     PISSN: 07858760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33338/ef.4241     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adis J. & Junk, W. J. 2002: Terrestrial invertebrates inhabiting lowland river floodplains of Central Amazonia and Central Europe: a review. -Freshwater Biology 47:711-731. (Pubitemid 34315709)
2. Ballinger, A., Mac Nelly, R. & Lake, P. S. 2005: Immediate and longer-term effects of managed flooding on floodplain invertebrate assemblages in south-eastern Australia: generation and maintenance of a mosaic landscape. -Freshwater Biology 50: 1190-1205. (Pubitemid 40886166)
3. Batáry, P., Kovács, A. & Báldi, A. 2008: Management effects on carabid beetles and spiders in Central Hungarian grasslands and cereal fields. -Community Ecology 9: 247-254.
4. Bell, D., Petts, D. E. & Sadler, J. P. 1999: The distribution of spiders in the wooded riparian zone of three rivers in Western Europe. -Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 15: 140-158.
5. Bonn, A., Hagen, K. & Reiche, D. W. 2002: The significance of flood regimes for carabid beetle and spider communities in riparian habitats - a comparison of three major rivers in Germany. -River Research and Applications 18: 43-64. (Pubitemid 34565263)
6. Bonte, D., Baert, L. & Maelfait, J.-P. 2002: Spider assemblage structure and stability in a heterogeneous coastal dune system (Belgium). -Journal of Arachnology 30:331-343. (Pubitemid 35431763)
7. Bonte, D., Lens, L., Maelfait, J.-P., Hoffmann, M. & Kuijken, E. 2003: Patch quality and connectivity influence spatial dynamics in a dune wolfspider. -Oecologia 135:227-233. (Pubitemid 36530895)
8. Bonte, D., Baert, L., Lens, L. & Maelfait, J.-P. 2004: Effects of aerial dispersal, habitat specialisation, and landscape structure on spider distribution across fragmented grey dunes. -Ecography 27: 343-349. (Pubitemid 38826108)
9. Buchar, J. & Ruzicka, V. 2002: Catalogue of Spiders of the Czech Republic. -Peres Publishers: Praha, Czech Republic, pp: 1-349.
10. Burel, F. & Baudry, J. 1995: Species biodiversity in changing agriculture landscapes: A case study in the Pays d'Auge, France.-Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 55: 193-200. (Pubitemid 3011275)
11. Carranza, M. L., Acosta, A. & Ricotta, C. 2007: Analyzing landscape diversity in time: The use of Rènyi's generalized entropy function. -Ecological Indicators 7: 505-510. (Pubitemid 46498984)
12. Clough, Y, Kruess, A. & Tschamtke, T. 2005: Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing local, landscape and regional scales.-Journal of Biogeography 32:20072014.
13. Crawley, M. J. 2007: The R Book. -John Wiley: New York pp: 627-685.
14. De'ath, G. 2002: Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. -Ecology 83: 1105-1117. (Pubitemid 36531000)
15. De'ath, G. 2010: mvpart: Multivariate partitioning. R package version 1.3-1. -[www document] URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mvpart (Site visited on 14 August 2010.)
16. Diekötter, T., Billeterand, R. & Crist, T. O.2008: Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. - Basic and Applied Ecology 9: 298-307.
17. Drápela, T., Moser, D., Zaller, J. G. & Frank, T. 2008: Spider assemblages in winter oilseed rape affected by landscape and site factors.-Ecography 31:254-262. (Pubitemid 351457534)
18. Duelli, P. 1997: Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: An approach at two different scales. - Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 62:81-91.
19. Dufrene, M. & Legendre, P. 1997: Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. -Ecological Monographs 67: 345366.
20. Entling, W., Schmidt, M. H., Bacher, S., Brandl, R. & Nentwig, W. 2007: Niche properties of Central European spiders: shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. -Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:440-448. (Pubitemid 46916995)
21. Gallé, R. & Torma, A. 2009: Epigeic spider (Araneae) assemblages of natural forest edges in the Kiskunság (Hungary). -Community Ecology 10: 146-151.
22. Gallé, R., Torma, A. & Körmöczi, L. 2010: Small-scale effect of habitat heterogeneity on invertebrate assemblages in Hungarian sandy grasslands. -Polish Journal of Ecology 58: 333-346.
23. Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. 2001 : Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. -Ecology Letters 4: 379-391. (Pubitemid 32752218)
24. Gravesen, E. 2000: Spiders (Araneae) and other invertebrate groups as ecological indicators in wetland area. - Ekologika (Bratislava) 19: 39-42.
25. Greenstone, M. H. 1984: Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity vs. prey availability. -Oecologia 62: 299-304. (Pubitemid 16277057)
26. Heck, K. L, van Belle, G. & Simberloff, D. 1975: Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. - Ecology 52: 1459-1461.
27. Heikkinen, M. W. & MacMahon, J. A. 2004: Assemblages of spiders on models of semi-arid shrubs.-The Journal of Arachnology 32: 313-323. (Pubitemid 39622914)
28. Horváth, R., Magura, T., Szinetár, Cs. & Tóthmérész, B. 2009: Spiders are not less diverse in small and isolated grasslands, but less diverse in overgrazed grasslands: A field study (East Hungary, Nyírség).-Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 130: 16-22.
29. Jeanneret, Ph., Schüpbach, B., Pfiffher, L., Herzog, F. & Walter, Th. 2003a: The Swiss agri-environmental programme and its effects on selected biodiversity indicators. -Journal for Nature Conservation 11:213-220. (Pubitemid 37396151)
30. Jeanneret, Ph., Schüpbach, B., Pfiffher, L. & Walter, Th. 2003b: Arthropod reaction to landscape and habitat features in agricultural landscapes. -Landscape Ecology 18: 253-263. (Pubitemid 36872705)
31. Jeanneret, Ph., Schüpbach, B. & Luka, H. 2003c: Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. -Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 98: 311-320. (Pubitemid 37215912)
32. Kajak, A. 2007: Effects of forested strips on spider assemblages in adjacent cereal fields: dispersal activity of spiders. -Polish Journal of Ecology 55: 691-704. (Pubitemid 351303303)
33. Kindt, R. 2008: The BiodiversityR Package. R package ver. 1.2. -[www document] URL http://cran.r-project.org/. (Site visited on 14 August 2010).
34. Koivula, M., Kotze, D. J., Hiisivuori, L. & Rita, H. 2003: Pitfall trap efficiency: do trap size, collecting fluid and vegetation structure matter? -Entomológica Fennica 14: 1-14. (Pubitemid 36837650)
35. Lambeets, K., Bonte, D., Van Looy, K., Hendrickx, F. & Maelfait, J.-P. 2006: Synecology of spiders (Araneae) of gravel banks and environmental constraints along a lowland river system, the Common Meuse (Belgium, the Netherlands) -In: Deltshev C & Stoev P (eds.), European Arachnology 2005 Acta Zoológica Bulgarica Suppl.l.pp: 137-149.
36. Lambeets, K., Hendrickx, F., Vanacker, S., Van Looy, K., Maelfait, J.-P. & Bonte, D. 2008: Assemblage structure and conservation value of spiders and carabid beetles from restored lowland river banks. -Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3133-3148.
37. Lambeets, K., Vandegehuchte, M. L., Maelfait, J.-P. & Bonte, D. 2009: Integrating environmental conditions and functional life history traits for riparian arthropod conservation planning. -Biological Conservation 146: 625-637.
38. Lövei, G. L., Magura, T., Tóthmérész, B., Ködölöcz, V. 2006: The influence of matrix and edges on species richness patterns of ground beetles (Coleóptera: Carabidae) in habitat islands. -Global Ecology and. Biogeography 15: 283-289.
39. Melbourne, B. A. 1999: Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: an experimental evaluation. -Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 228-239.
40. Öberg, S., Ekbom, B. & Bommarco, R. 2007: Influence of habitat type and surrounding landscape on spider diversity in Swedish agroecosystems. -Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 122: 211-219. (Pubitemid 46710190)
41. Paetzold, A., Yoshimura, C. & Tockner, K. 2008: Riparian arthropod responses to flow regulation and river channelization. -Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 894-903. (Pubitemid 351614872)
42. Pearce, J. L. & Venier, L. A. 2006: The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: A review. -Ecological Indicators 6: 780-793. (Pubitemid 44038648)
43. Pekar, S. 1999: Some observations on overwintering of spiders (Araneae) in two contrasting orchards in the Czech Republic. -Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 73: 205-210. (Pubitemid 29303172)
44. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S. & Sarkar, D. 2007: nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3, 1-86. -[www document] URL http://ftp.uni-bayreuth.de/math/statlib/R/CRAN/doc/ packages/nlme.pdf (Site visited on 14 February 2010).
45. R Development Core Team. 2007: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. -[www document] URL http://www.R-project.org. (Site visited on 14 August 2010).
46. Ricketts, T. H. 2001: The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. -The American Naturalist 158: 87-99. (Pubitemid 32550582)
47. Ripley, B. 2009: Tree: Classification and regression trees. R package version 1.0-27. -[www document] URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tree (Site visited on 14 August 2010).
48. Rothenbücher, J. & Schaefer, M. 2006: Submersion tolerance in floodplain arthropod communities. -Basic and Applied Ecology 7: 398-408. (Pubitemid 44176391)
49. Sabo, J. L., Sponseller, R., Dixon, M., Gade, K., Harms, T., Heffernan, J., Jani, A., Katz, G., Soykan, G., Watts, J. & Welter, J. 2005: Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. -Ecology 86: 56-62. (Pubitemid 40199591)
50. Samu, F., Sunderland, K. D. & Szinetár, Cs. 1999: Scaledependent dispersal and distribution patterns of spiders in agricultural systems: a review. -Journal of Arachnology 27: 325-332. (Pubitemid 129340853)
51. Schmidt, M. H. & Hänggi, A. 2007: Zelotes mundus (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) in the Camargue: a continental species reaches the western Mediterranean coast. - Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 14:27-29.
52. Schmidt, M. H., Roschewitz, I., Thies, C. & Tscharntke, T. 2005: Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground-dwelling farmland spiders. -Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 281-287. (Pubitemid 40641082)
53. Schmidt, M. H., Clough, Y, Schulz, W, Westphalen, A., Tscharntke, T. 2006: Capture efficiency and preservation attributes of different fluids in pitfall traps. - Journal of Arachnology 34: 159-162.
54. Schmidt, M. H., Thies, C., Nentwig, W & Tscharntke, T. 2008: Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales.-Journal of Biogeography 35: 157-166. (Pubitemid 350256021)
55. Schwab, A., Dubois, D., Fried, P. M & Edwards, P. J. 2002: Estimating the biodiversity of hay meadows in northeastern Switzerland on the basis of vegetation structure. -Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93: 197-209. (Pubitemid 35307319)
56. Szita, E., Samu. F., Szinetár, Cs., Dudás, Gy, Botos, E., Horváth, R. & Szalkovszki, O.2006: New data on the occurence of Gnaphosa rufula (L. Koch, 1866) and Gnaphosa mongolica Simon, 1895 in Hungary (Araneae: Gnaphosidae) -In: Deltschev, C. & Stoev, P. (eds.), European Arachnology 2005 pp. 329-334.
57. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V, Tielbörger, K., Wichmann, M. C, Schwager, M. & Jeltsch, F. 2004: Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures.-Journal of Biogeography 31: 79-92. (Pubitemid 38106652)
58. Thorbek, P. & Topping, G J. 2005: The inuence of landscape diversity and heterogeneity on spacial dynamics of agrobiont linyphiid spiders: An individual based model. -BioControl, 50: 1-33.
59. Topping, C J. & Sunderland, K. D. 1992: Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. - Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 485-491.
60. Tóthmérész, B. 1995: Comparsion of different methods for diversity ordering.-Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 283-290.
61. Turner, M. G. 2005: Landscape ecology: What is the state of the science? -Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 319-44.
62. Uetz, G. W. 1976: Gradient analysis of spider communities in a streamside forest. -Oecologia 22: 373-385.
63. Urák, I. & Samu, F. 2008: Contribution to the spider fauna of the Mohos peat bog from Transylvania, with some new data for Romania. -North-Western Journal of Zoology 4: 50-60.
64. Usher, M., Field, J. P., Bedford, S. E., 1993: Biogeography and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods in farm woodlands. -Biodiversity Letters 1: 54-62. (Pubitemid 24409838)
65. Vasques, G. M., Grunwald, S. & Sickman, J. O. 2008: Comparison of multivariate methods for inferential modeling of soil carbon using visible/near-infrared spectra. -Geoderma: 146: 14-25.
66. Ward, J. V., Tockner, K., Arscott, D. B. & Claret, C. 2002: Riverine landscape diversity. -Freshwater Biology 47:517-539.
67. Wise, D. H. 1993: Spiders in ecological webs. -Cambridge University Press, pp: 1-328.
68. With K. A, Pavuk, D. M., Worchuck, J. L, Oates, R. K. & Fisher, J. L. 2002: Threshold effects of landscape structure on biological control in agroecosystems. - Ecological Applications 12: 52-65.
69. Work, T. T., Shorthouse, D. P., Spence, J. R., Volney, W J. A. & Langor, D. 2004: Stand composition and structure of the boreal mixedwood and epigaeic arthropods of the Ecosystem Management Emulating Natural Disturbance (EMEND) landbase in northwestern Alberta. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34:417-430. (Pubitemid 38600983)
70. Ysnel, F. & Canard, A. 2000: Spider biodiversity in connection with the vegetation structure and the foliage orientation of hedges. -Journal of Arachnology 28: 107-114.