Understanding broadcast based peer review on open source software projects

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 541-550

  Rigby, Peter C ^a   Storey, Margaret Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

case studies; grounded theory; open source software; peer review

Indexed keywords

CODE CHANGES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; GROUNDED THEORY; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE PROJECTS; PEER REVIEW; REVIEW PROCESS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

OPEN SYSTEMS;

EID: 79959863207     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1985793.1985867     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. J. Asundi and R. Jayant. Patch Review Processes in Open Source Software Development Communities: A Comparative Case Study. HICSS, 0:166c, 2007.
2. C. Bird, A. Gourley, and P. Devanbu. Detecting Patch Submission and Acceptance in OSS Projects. In MSR '07, 2007.
3. C. Bird, A. Gourley, P. Devanbu, M. Gertz, and A. Swaminathan. Mining email social networks. pages 137-143, 2006.
4. S. Breu, R. Premraj, J. Sillito, and T. Zimmermann. Information needs in bug reports: improving cooperation between developers and users. In CSCW '10, pages 301-310, 2010.
5. M. Fagan. A history of software inspections. 2002.
6. K. Fogel. Producing Open Source Software. O'Reilly, 2005.
7. B. Glaser. Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA, 1998.
8. C. Gutwin, R. Penner, and K. Schneider. Group awareness in distributed software development. In CSCW '04, pages 72-81, 2004.
9. P.-H. Kamp. A bike shed (any colour will do) on greener grass... FreeBSD mailing list archive http://www.webcitation.org/5ZZaDOxyW, 1999.
10. A. Mockus, R. T. Fielding, and J. Herbsleb. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11(3):1-38, July 2002.
11. M. Nurolahzade, S. M. Nasehi, S. H. Khandkar, and S. Rawal. The role of patch review in software evolution: an analysis of the mozilla firefox. In IWPSE-Evol '09, pages 9-18, 2009.
12. A. Onwuegbuzie and N. Leech. Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron? Quality and quantity, 41(2):233-249, 2007.
13. C. N. Parkinson. Parkinson's Law: The Pursuit of Progress. John Murray, 1958.
14. E. S. Raymond. The Cathedral and the Bazaar. O'Reilly and Associates, 1999.
15. P. C. Rigby. Understanding Open Source Software Peer Review: Review Processes, Parameters and Statistical Models, and Underlying Behaviours and Mechanisms. thechiselgroup.org/rigby-dissertation.pdf, Dissertation, 2011.
16. P. C. Rigby, D. M. German, and M.-A. Storey. Open Source Software Peer Review Practices: A Case Study of the Apache Server. In ICSE '08, pages 541-550, 2008.
17. C. Sauer, D. R. Jeffery, L. Land, and P. Yetton. The Effectiveness of Software Development Technical Reviews: A Behaviorally Motivated Program of Research. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 26(1):1-14, 2000.
18. S. Whittaker and C. Sidner. Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 276-283, 1996.
19. R. K. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, volume 5 of Applied Social Research Methods Series. Sage Publications Inc., 2 edition, 1994.