Understanding the longevity of code smells: Preliminary results of an explanatory survey

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 33-36

  Arcoverde, Roberta ^a   Garcia, Alessandro ^a   Figueiredo, Eduardo ^b  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UFMG   (Brazil)

Author keywords

code smells; empirical study; refactoring

Indexed keywords

CODE SMELL; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; PRODUCT-LINES; REFACTORING TOOLS; REFACTORINGS; SOFTWARE PROJECT; TOOL SUPPORT;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SURVEYS;

ODORS;

EID: 79959827615     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1984732.1984740     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Beck, K. 2003. Test-driven Development by Example. Addison-Wesley.
2. Fowler et al. 1999. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley.
3. Janzen, D. 2005. Software architecture improvement through test-driven development. OOPSLA, ACM.
4. Müller, M; Hagner, O. 2002. Experimenting about test-first programming. IEE Proceedings 149(5):131-136.
5. st ICSE, USA.
6. th ICSE, USA.
7. I. Bertran et al. 2011. An exploratory study of code smells in evolving aspect-oriented systems. Proc. AOSD. (to appear).
8. G. Antoniol, et al. 2007. Mining the Lexicon Used by Programmers during Software Evolution. Proc. of ICSM.
9. M. Eaddy, et al. 2008. Do Crosscutting Concerns Cause Defects? IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 34(4): 497-515.
10. Madeyski, L. 2006. The impact of pair programming and test-driven development on package dependencies in object-oriented design. In LNCS, volume 4034/2006, 278-289 (Pubitemid 44090523)
11. T. Mens and T. Tourwe. 2004. A survey of software refactoring. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 30, no. 2.
12. Vander Alves et al. 2005. Extracting and Evolving Mobile Games Product Lines. SPLC: 70-81