MODELING THE PROSODY OF HIDDEN EVENTS FOR IMPROVED WORD RECOGNITION

6th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 311-314

  Stolcke, Andreas ^a   Shriberg, Elizabeth ^a   Hakkani Tür, Dilek ^a   Tür, Gökhan ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SPEECH COMMUNICATION; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

% REDUCTIONS; DISFLUENCIES; KNOWLEDGE SOURCES; LANGUAGE MODEL; NEW APPROACHES; PROSODIC FEATURES; SENTENCE BOUNDARIES; SPEECH PROSODY; SWITCHBOARD CORPUS; WORD RECOGNITION;

DECISION TREES;

EID: 79959823252     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. L. R. Bahl, F. Jelinek, and R. L. Mercer. A maximum likelihood approach to continuous speech recognition. IEEE PAMI, 5(2):179-190, 1983.
2. J. Bear, J. Dowding, and E. Shriberg. Integrating multiple knowledge sources for detection and correction of repairs in human-computer dialog. In Proc. ACL, pp. 56-63, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 1992.
3. L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth and Brooks, Pacific Grove, CA, 1984.
4. J. J. Godfrey, E. C. Holliman, and J. McDaniel. SWITCHBOARD: Telephone speech corpus for research and development. In Proc. ICASSP, vol. 1, pp. 517-520, San Francisco, 1992.
5. P. Heeman and J. Allen. Intonational boundaries, speech repairs, and discourse markers: Modeling spoken dialog. In Proc. ACL/EACL, Madrid, 1997.
6. P. A. Heeman and J. Allen. Detecting and correcting speech repairs. In Proc. ACL, pp. 295-302, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, 1994.
7. R. Kompe. Prosody in speech understanding systems. Springer, Berlin, 1997.
8. M. Mast, R. Kompe, S. Harbeck, A. Kießling, H. Niemann, E. Nöth, E. G. Schukat-Talamazzini, and V. Warnke. Dialog act classification with the help of prosody. In H. T. Bunnell and W. Idsardi, editors, Proc. ICSLP, vol. 3, pp. 1732-1735, Philadelphia, 1996.
9. M. Meteer, A. Taylor, R. MacIntyre, and R. Iyer. Dysfluency annotation stylebook for the Switchboard corpus. Distributed by LDC, ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/treebank/swbd/doc/DFL-book.ps.gz, 1995. Revised June 1995 by Ann Taylor.
10. C. H. Nakatani and J. Hirschberg. A corpus-based study of repair cues in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(3):1603-1616, 1994.
11. M. Ostendorf, C. Wightman, and N. Veilleux. Parse scoring with prosodic information: an analysis/synthesis approach. Computer Speech and Language, 4:193-210, 1993.
12. E. Shriberg, R. Bates, and A. Stolcke. A prosody-only decision-tree model for disfluency detection. In G. Kokkinakis, N. Fakotakis, and E. Dermatas, editors, Proc. EUROSPEECH, vol. 5, pp. 2383-2386, Rhodes, Greece, 1997.
13. E. E. Shriberg. Acoustic properties of disfluent repetitions. In Proceedings International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 384-387, Stockholm, 1995.
14. A. Stolcke and E. Shriberg. Automatic linguistic segmentation of conversational speech. In H. T. Bunnell and W. Idsardi, editors, Proc. ICSLP, vol. 2, pp. 1005-1008, Philadelphia, 1996.
15. A. Stolcke, E. Shriberg, R. Bates, M. Ostendorf, D. Hakkani, M. Plauche, G. Tür, and Y. Lu. Automatic detection of sentence boundaries and disfluencies based on recognized words. In R. H. Mannell and J. Robert-Ribes, editors, Proc. ICSLP, vol. 5, pp. 2247-2250, Sydney, 1998. Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.
16. N. M. Veilleux and M. Ostendorf. Prosody/parse scoring and its applications in ATIS. In Proc. ARPA HLT Workshop, pp. 335-340, Plainsboro, NJ, 1993.
17. A. Waibel. Prosodic knowledge sources for word hypothesization in a continuous speech recognition system. In Proc. ICASSP, pp. 20.16.1-20.16.4, Dallas, Texas, 1987.