Efficacy and durability of two hyaluronic acid-based fillers in the correction of nasolabial folds: Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, actively controlled clinical pilot study

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 768-775

  Nast, Alexander ^a   Reytan, Natalie ^a   Hartmann, Vanessa ^a   Pathirana, Delano ^a   Bachmann, Frank ^a   Erdmann, Ricardo ^a   Rzany, Berthold ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILLER; HYALURONIC ACID;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EDEMA; ERYTHEMA; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; GLOBAL AESTHETIC IMPROVEMENT SCALE; HUMAN; INJECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NASOLABIAL FOLD; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SKINFOLD; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WRINKLE; WRINKLE SEVERITY RATING SCALE;

DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYALURONIC ACID; INJECTIONS, INTRADERMAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SKIN AGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISCOSUPPLEMENTS;

EID: 79959820509     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01993..x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S. The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale: a validation study. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004;5: 49-52. (Pubitemid 38316542)
2. Baumann LS, Shamban AT, Lupo MP, Monheit GD, et al. Comparison of smooth-gel hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with crosslinked bovine collagen: a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, within-subject study. Dermatol Surg 2007;33(Suppl 2):S128-35.
3. Pinsky MA, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, Walker PS, et al. Juvederm injectable gel: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectiveness. Aesthet Surg J 2008;28:17-23. (Pubitemid 351249152)
4. Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:588-95. (Pubitemid 36702442)
5. Rao J, Chi GC, Goldman MP. Clinical comparison between two hyaluronic acid-derived fillers in the treatment of nasolabial folds: hylaform versus restylane. Dermatol Surg 2005;31:1587-90.
6. Carruthers A, Carey W, De Lorenzi C, Remington K, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy of two hyaluronic acid derivatives, restylane perlane and hylaform, in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2005;31: 1591-8; discussion 98.