Temporal context affects duration reproduction

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 157-170

  Ryan, Lawrence J ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central tendency; Context; Duration reproduction; Repetition; Time perception; Timing

Indexed keywords

AROUSAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REPRODUCTION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULATION; CENTRAL TENDENCY; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPETITION EFFECT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL REPRODUCTION TASK; TIME;

EID: 79959792849     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.477812     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allan, L. (2002). Are the referents remembered in temporal bisection? Learning and Motivation, 33, 10-31.
2. Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 184-197. (Pubitemid 127459385)
3. Brown, S. W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 106-116.
4. Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 566-582. (Pubitemid 14122562)
5. Coltheart, V. R., & von Sturmer, G. (1970). A serial effect in time estimation. Psychonomic Science, 10, 283-284.
6. Eisler, H. (1975). Subjective duration and psychophysics. Psychological Review, 82, 429-450.
7. Gibbon, J., & Church, R. M. (1990). Representation of time. Cognition, 37, 23-54.
8. Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22-44. (Pubitemid 33604024)
9. Hellstrom, A. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35-61.
10. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Hicks, R., & Allen, D. (1979). The repetition effect in judgments of temporal duration across minutes, days, and months. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 323-333.
12. Hicks, R., Allen, D., & Mayo, J. (1984). A developmental study of temporal duration judgments. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144(1), 31-38.
13. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W., & Kinsbourne, M. (1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 719-730.
14. Hollingworth, H. L. (1910). The central tendency of judgment. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7, 461-468.
15. Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220-241.
16. Jamieson, D. G. (1977). Two presentation order effects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 31(4), 184-194.
17. Jamieson, D. G., & Petrusic, W. M. (1975). The dependence of time-order error direction on stimulus range. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 175-182.
18. Killeen, P. R., & Fetterman, J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95, 273-295.
19. Malapani, C., Rakitin, B., Levy, R., Meck, W., Deweer, B., Dubois, B., & Gibbon, J. (1998). Coupled temporal memories in Parkinson's disease: A dopamine-related dysfunction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 316-331. (Pubitemid 28247945)
20. Marks, L. E. (1992). The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive and qualitative continua. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 187-198.
21. Meck, W. H. (2005). Neuropsychology of timing and time perception. Brain and Cognition, 58, 1-8. (Pubitemid 40692874)
22. Noulhiane, M., Pouthas, V., & Samson, S. (2009). Is time reproduction sensitive to sensory modalities? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 18-34.
23. Parducci, A. (1968). The relativism of absolute judgments. Scientific American, 219, 84-90.
24. Philip, B. R. (1949). The frame of reference concept. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 3, 73-79.
25. Riskey, D., Parducci, A., & Beauchamp, G K. (1979). Effects of context in judgments of sweetness and pleasantness. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 171-176. (Pubitemid 10158626)
26. Ryan, L. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1468-1482.
27. Ryan, L. J., Henry, K., Robey, T, & Edwards, J. A. (2004). Resolution of conflicts between internal and external information sources on a time perception task: The role of perceived information reliability and attributional style. Acta Psychologica, 117, 205-229. (Pubitemid 39435992)
28. Sailor, K. M., & Antoine, M. (2005). Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian? Memory and Cognition, 33, 840-851. (Pubitemid 46202392)
29. Schifferstein, H. N. (1995). Contextual effects in difference judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(1), 56-70.
30. Staddon, J. E. R. (2005). Interval timing: Memory, not a clock. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 312-314. (Pubitemid 40910327)
31. Staddon, J. E. R., & Higa, J. J. (1999). Time and memory: Towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 215-251.
32. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
33. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the "internal clock". Psychological Monographs, 77, 1-31.
34. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
35. Von Sturmer, G. (1966). Stimulus variation and sequential judgments of duration. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 354-357.
36. Vroon, P. A. (1972). The lengthening effect in sequential estimations of a short interval: An alternative explanation. Psychologische Forschung, 35, 263-276.
37. Ward, L. M. (1979). Stimulus information and sequential dependencies in magnitude estimation and cross-modal matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 444-459.
38. Wearden, J. H. (2004). Decision processes in models of timing. Acta Neurobiologica Experimentalis (Warsaw), 64, 303-317. (Pubitemid 38962926)
39. Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48 B, 289-310. (Pubitemid 126421648)
40. Wearden, J. H., & Grindrod, R. (2003). Manipulating decision processes in the human scalar timing system. Behavioural Processes, 61, 47-56. (Pubitemid 36110483)
41. Wearden, J. H., Pilkington, R., & Carter, E. (1999). "Subjective lengthening" during repeated testing of a simple temporal discrimination. Behavioural Processes, 46, 25-38. (Pubitemid 29229767)
42. Wiegersma, S. (1982). A control theory of sequential response production. Psychological Research, 44, 175-188.
43. Woodrow, H., & Stott, L. H. (1936). The effect of practice on positive time-order errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 694-705.
44. Zakay, D. (1990). The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 59-84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
45. Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1997). Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 12-16. (Pubitemid 127170918)