Uniocular and binocular fields of rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 249, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 909-919

  Rowe, Fiona J ^a   Hanif, Sahira ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b WARRINGTON AND HALTON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Field of binocular single vision; Octopus perimetry; Stimulus speed; Uniocular ductions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOPIA; EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GOLDMANN PERIMETRY; HUMAN; INFERIOR OBLIQUE EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; INFERIOR RECTUS EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATERAL RECTUS EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEDIAL RECTUS EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; OCTOPUS PERIMETRY; OCULAR ROTATION; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STIMULUS SPEED; SUPERIOR OBLIQUE EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; SUPERIOR RECTUS EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; UNIOCULAR VISUAL FIELD; VELOCITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR MOTILITY DISORDERS; OCULOMOTOR MUSCLES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959767783     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: 1435702X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1596-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hanif S, Rowe FJ, O'Connor A (2009) The comparative analysis of assessment methods for uniocular fields of fixation. Br Ir Orthopt J 6:47-51
2. Kestenbaum A (1961) Clinical methods of neuro ophthalmic examinations, 2nd edn. Grune and Stratton, New York
3. Roper-Hall G (1975) Duction measurements in limited rotations. Br Orthopt J 32:72-76
4. Esser J, Melzer I (1986) Comparison of monocular excursion measurements in normals and in patients with motility disorders. In: Campos E (ed). Proceedings 5th International Strabismological Association. Athena Scientific Distributors, Modena, pp 285-292
5. Steel DHW, Hoh HB, Potts MJ, Harrad RA (1995) Uniocular fields of fixation in Graves' orbitopathy. Eye 9:348-351
6. Arens B (1997) Estimation of duction ranges using visual acuity. In: Spiritus M. (ed). Transactions 23rd European Strabismological Association. Aeolus Press, Amsterdam, pp 355-360
7. Haggerty H, Richardson S, Mitchell KW, Dickinson AJ (2005) A modified method for measuring uniocular fields of fixation. Arch Ophthalmol 123:356-362
8. Gerling J, Lieb B, Kommerell G (1997-98) Duction ranges in normal probands and patients with Grave's ophthalmopathy determined using the Goldmann perimeter. Int Ophthalmol 21:213-221
9. Kushner BJ (2000) The usefulness of the cervical range of motion device in the ocular motility examination. Arch Ophthalmol 18:946-950
10. Hanif S (2008) UK Orthoptic survey of ocular rotation measures. (personal communication)
11. Rowe FJ, Hanif S (2009) Uniocular ocular rotation measures: Octopus versus Goldmann. Trans. 33rd European Strabismological Association. Belgrade, Serbia. Ed: Gomez de Liano R. pp. 55-58
12. Haag-Streit International (2010) Octopus 900 Standard Operating procedures. http://www.haag-streit.com/produkte/perimetry/octopusr-900.html Accessed 1 June 2010
13. Bland JM, Altman DG (1995) Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 346:1085-1087
14. Rowe FJ (2006) Visual fields via the visual pathway. Blackwell Science Publications, Oxford. ISBN 1-4051-1525