A new generic circumscription in tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae)

Taxon

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 681-690

  Levin, Rachel A ^a   Bernardello, Gabriel ^b   Whiting, Carolyn ^a   Miller, Jill S ^a  

^a AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CÓRDOBA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Grabowskia; Lycieae; Lycium; Phrodus; Phylogeny; Solanaceae

Indexed keywords

COHORT ANALYSIS; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NEW GENUS; NEW SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

GRABOWSKIA; LYCIUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PHRODUS; SOLANACEAE;

EID: 79959750980     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.603005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bernardello, G., Stiefkens, L. & Las Peñas, M.L. 2008. Karyotype studies in Grabowskia and Phrodus (Solanaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 275: 265-269.
2. Bernardello, L.M. 1983. Estudios en Lycium (Solanaceae). III. Estructura y desarrollo de fruto y semilla en Lycium y Grabowskia (Solanaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 23: 147-176.
3. Bernardello, L.M. 1986a. Estudios en Lycium (Solanaceae). V. El gineceo de Lycieae. Kurtziana 18: 23-45.
4. Bernardello, L.M. 1986b. Revisión taxonómica de las especies sudamericanas de Lycium (Solanaceae). Bol. Acad. Nac. Ci. Republ. Argent. 57: 173-356.
5. Bernardello, L.M. & Hunziker, A.T. 1987. Estudios sobre Solanaceae XXVI. Revisión taxonómica de Phrodus. Kurtziana 19: 69-76.
6. Britton, N.L. & Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions, vol. 3. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
7. Chiang, F. 1983. Nomenclatural changes for new sectional delimitation in Lycium (Solanaceae) of the new world. Taxon 32: 456-458.
8. Chiang-Cabrera, F. 1981. A taxonomic study of the North American species of Lycium (Solanaceae). Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, U.S.A.
9. Condor Project. 2005. Condor, version 6.6.10. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/ condor/.
10. Cota, J.H. & Wallace, R.S. 1995. Karyotypic studies in the genus Echinocereus (Cactaceae) and their taxonomic significance. Caryologia 48:105-122.
11. D'Arcy, W.G. 1986. The genera of Solanaceae and their types. Solanaceae Newslett. 2: 10-33.
12. Filippa, E.M. & Bernardello, L.M. 1987. Sobre la anatomía de órganos vegetativos y el ánalisis de la variabilidad en Phrodus (Solanaceae). Kurtziana 19: 57-67.
13. Hunziker, A.T. 1977. Estudios sobre Solanaceae. VIII. Novedades varias sobre tribus, géneros, secciones y especies de Sud América. Kurtziana 10: 7-59.
14. Hunziker, A.T. 1997. Flora fanerogamica Argentina, fasc. 41, Solanaceae, parte 5, Tribu IV. Lycieae, parte B. Córdoba: Programa PROFLORA (CONICET).
15. Hunziker, A.T. 2001. Genera Solanacearum. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: Gantner.
16. Knapp, S. 2002. Tobacco to tomatoes: A phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 2001-2022.
17. Levin, R.A., Blanton, J. & Miller, J.S. 2009a. Phylogenetic utility of nuclear nitrate reductase: A multi-locus comparison of nuclear and chloroplast sequence data for inference of relationships among American Lycieae (Solanaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 50: 608-617.
18. Levin, R.A. & Miller, J.S. 2005. Relationships within tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae): Paraphyly of Lycium and multiple origins of gender dimorphism. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 2044-2053.
19. Levin, R.A., Shak, J.R., Bernardello, G., Venter, A.M. & Miller, J.S. 2007. Evolutionary relationships in tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae). Acta Hort. 745: 225-239.
20. Levin, R.A., Whelan, A. & Miller, J.S. 2009b. The utility of nuclear conserved ortholog set II (COSII) genomic regions for species-level phylogenetic inference in Lycium (Solanaceae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 53: 881-890.
21. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species plantarum. Stockholm: impensis Laurentii Salvii.
22. Linnaeus f., C. 1782. Supplementum plantarum, ed. 13. Braunschweig: Impensis orphanotrophei.
23. Liu, L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 24: 2542-2543.
24. McNeill, J., Barrie, F.R., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D.L., Marhold, K., Nicolson, D.H., Prado, J., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Wiersema, J.H. & Turland, N.J. (eds.) 2006. International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code): Adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Vegetabile 146. Ruggell: Gantner.
25. Mercado-Ruaro, P. & Delgado-Salinas, A. 1998. Karyotypic studies on species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae: Phaseolinae). Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1-9.
26. Miers, J. 1849. Phrodus. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 2, 4: 33-35.
27. Miller, J.S. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships and the evolution of gender dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae). Syst. Bot. 27: 416-428.
28. Miller, J.S., Kamath, A., Damashek, J. & Levin, R.A. 2011. Out of America to Africa or Asia: Inference of dispersal histories using nuclear and plastid DNA and the S-RNase self-incompatibility locus. Molec. Biol. Evol. 28: 793-801.
29. Miller, J.S., Kamath, A. & Levin, R.A. 2009. Do multiple tortoises equal a hare? The utility of nine noncoding plastid regions for species-level phylogenetics in tribe Lycieae (Solanaceae). Syst. Bot. 34: 796-804.
30. Miller, J.S., Levin, R.A. & Feliciano, N.M. 2008. A tale of two continents: Baker's Rule and the maintenance of self-incompatibility in Lycium (Solanaceae). Evolution 62: 1052-1065.
31. Miller, J.S. & Venable, D.L. 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289: 2335-2338.
32. Moretti, A. 1990. Karyotypic data on North and Central American Zamiaceae (Cycadales) and their phylogenetic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 1016-1029.
33. Olmstead, R.G., Bohs, L., Migid, H.A., Santiago-Valentin, E., Garcia, V.F. & Collier, S.M. 2008. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon 57: 1159-1181.
34. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
35. Rambaut, A. 2002. Se-Al: Sequence alignment editor, version 2.0a11. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.
36. Schlechtendal, D.F.L. 1832. Observationes quaedam in aliquot Solanacearum genera et species. Linnaea 7: 52-73.
37. Sheidai, M., Narengi, Z. & Khatamsaz, M. 1999. Karyotype and seed protein analyses of Lycium (Solanaceae) in Iran. Edinburgh J. Bot. 56: 253-264.
38. Spegazzini, C. 1902. Nova addenda ad floram patagonicam. Anales Soc. Ci. Argent. 53: 166-185.
39. Stiefkens, L. & Bernardello, G. 2000. Karyotypes and DNA content in diploid and polyploid Lycium (Solanaceae). Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 35: 237-244.
40. Stiefkens, L. & Bernardello, G. 2002. Karyotypic studies in Lycium section Mesocope (Solanaceae) from South America. Caryologia 55: 199-206.
41. Stiefkens, L. & Bernardello, G. 2006. Karyotypic studies in Lycium sections Schistocalyx and Sclerocarpellum (Solanaceae). Edinburgh J. Bot. 62: 53-67.
42. Stiefkens, L. & Bernardello, L. 1996. Karyotypic studies in South American Lycium (Solanaceae). Cytologia 61: 395-402.
43. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
44. Wilgenbusch, J. 2003. RepMaker, version 0.9. http://paup.scs.fsu.edu/ scripts/repmaker.tar.gz.
45. Yeung, K., Miller, J.S., Savage, A.E., Husband, B.C., Igic, B. & Kohn, J.R. 2005. Association of ploidy and sexual system in Lycium californicum (Solanaceae). Evolution 59: 2048-2055.
46. Zhao, D., Xu, H., Hu, Z. & Wang, L. 2000. Karyotype analysis of Lycium barbarum L. of China. J. Lanchow Univ., Nat. Sci. 36: 97-100.