Effects of an evidence service on community-based AIDS service organizations' use of research evidence: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Implementation Science

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Wilson, Michael G ^a,b,c   Lavis, John N ^a,b,d   Grimshaw, Jeremy M ^e,f   Haynes, R Brian ^d   Bekele, Tsegaye ^c   Rourke, Sean B ^c,g,h  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ONTARIO HIV TREATMENT NETWORK   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^g ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CANADA; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CANADA; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; ELECTRONIC MAIL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 79959704876     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-52     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. World Health Organization Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion 1986, Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Division of Health Promotion, Education & Communication, World Health Organization.
2. World Health Organization Health 21: Health for All in the 21st Century 1999, Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization.
3. Dobbins M, Rosenbaum P, Plews N, Law M, Fysh A. Information transfer: What do decision-makers want and need from researchers. Implementation Science 2007, 2:20. 10.1186/1748-5908-2-20, 1929120, 17608940.
4. Haynes RB, Haines A. Getting research findings into practice: Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice. BMJ 1998, 317:273-276. 1113594, 9677226.
5. Innvaer S, Vist GE, Trommald M, Oxman AD. Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2002, 7:239-244. 10.1258/135581902320432778, 12425783.
6. Lavis JN, Davies HTO, Oxman AD, Denis J-L, Golden-Biddle K, Ferlie E. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2005, 10:S1:35-S1:48.
7. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Wayne Perry B. Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Milbank Quarterly 2007, 85:729-768. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x, 18070335.
8. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in translation: Time for a map?. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 2007, 26:13-24.
9. Grol RP, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokking H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. BMJ 1998, 317:858-861. 31096, 9748183.
10. Lavis JN. Ideas at the margin or marginalized ideas? Nonmedical determinants of health in Canada. Health Affairs 2002, 21:107-112. 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.107, 11900150.
11. McGlynn E, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 2003, 348:2635-2645. 10.1056/NEJMsa022615, 12826639.
12. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States?. Milbank Quarterly 1998, 76:517-563. 10.1111/1468-0009.00105, 9879302.
13. Haynes RB, Cotoi C, Holland J, Walters L, Wilczynski N, Jedraszewski D, et al. Second-Order Peer Review of the Medical Literature for Clinical Practitioners. JAMA 2006, 295:1801-1808. 10.1001/jama.295.15.1801, 16622142.
14. Haynes RB, Holland J, Cotoi C, McKinlay RJ, Wilczynski NL, Walters LA, et al. McMaster PLUS: A cluster randomized clinical trial of an intervention to accelerate clinical use of evidence-based information from digital libraries. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006, 13:593-600. 10.1197/jamia.M2158, 1656957, 16929034.
15. Walshe K, Rundall TG. Evidence-based management: From theory to practice in health care. Milbank Quarterly 2001, 79:429-457. 10.1111/1468-0009.00214, 11565163.
16. Rundall TG, Martelli PF, Arroyo L, McCurdy R, Graetz I, Neuwirth EB, et al. The informed decisions toolbox: tools for knowledge transfer and performance improvement. Journal of Healthcare Management 2007, 52:325-341.
17. Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin SA, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP). Health Research Policy and Systems 2009, 7.
18. Lavis JN. How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?. PLoS Medicine 2009, 6.
19. Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Hammill AC, Boyko JA, Grimshaw J, Oxman A, et al. Enhancing the Retrieval of Systematic Reviews that Can Inform Health System Management and Policymaking (under review) 2011,
20. McMaster Health Forum Health Systems Evidence. 2011, McMaster Health Forum., http://www.healthsystemsevidence.org/
21. Wilson MG, Lavis JN, Travers R, Rourke SB. Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: Helping community-based organizations link research to action. Implementation Science 2010, 5:33. 10.1186/1748-5908-5-33, 2873302, 20423486.
22. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Waye PB. Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly 2007, 85:729-768. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x, 18070335.
23. Young SK. Evidence-based management: A literature review. Journal of Nursing Management 2002, 10:145-151. 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2002.00309.x, 11982781.
24. Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK. Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006, 84:620-628. 10.2471/BLT.06.030312, 2627430, 16917649.
25. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research 2007, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
26. CADTH Rx for Change. 2010, CADTH., http://www.cadth.ca/index.php/en/compus/optimal-ther-resources/interventions/
27. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. 2010, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination., http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/
28. Effective Health Care Research Consortium 2010, Effective Health Care Research Consortium., http://www.liv.ac.uk/evidence/
29. Cochrane Collaboration Evidence AID Project. 2010, Cochrane Collaboration., http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane-reviews/evidence-aid-project
30. Health-Evidence. 2009, http://www.health-evidence.ca/
31. Health Knowledge Network 2010, Health Knowledge Network., http://www.latrobe.edu.au/chcp/hkn/index.html
32. Australasian Cochrane Centre Policy Liaison Initiative. 2010, Australasian Cochrane Centre., http://www.cochrane.org.au/ebpnetwork/
33. Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials. 2010, http://www.support-collaboration.org/summaries.htm
34. The WHO Reproductive Health Library 2010, The WHO Reproductive Health Library., http://apps.who.int/rhl/en/
35. Lavis JN, Ross SE, McLeod CB, Gildiner A. Measuring the impact of health research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2003, 8:165-170. 10.1258/135581903322029520, 12869343.
36. Foy R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw JM, Penney G, Campbell M, Grol RP. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002, 55:717-722. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00403-1, 12160920.
37. Grilli R, Lomas J. Evaluating the message: The relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Medical Care 1994, 32:202-213. 10.1097/00005650-199403000-00002, 8145598.
38. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. British Medical Journal 1998, 317:858-861. 31096, 9748183.
39. Haynes RB, Holland J, Cotoi C, McKinlay RJ, Wilczynski NL, Walters LA, et al. McMaster PLUS: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intervention to Accelerate Clinical Use of Evidence-based Information from Digital Libraries. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006, 13:593-600. 10.1197/jamia.M2158, 1656957, 16929034.
40. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991, 50:211.
41. Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, et al. Constructing Questionnaires Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Manual for Health Services Researchers 2004, Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle.
42. Sheeran P. Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology 2002, 1-36. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Stroebe W, Hewscone M.
43. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 2001, 40:471-499. 10.1348/014466601164939, 11795063.
44. Bonetti D, Pitts NB, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Johnston M, Steen N, et al. Applying psychological theory to evidence-based clinical practice: Identifying factors predictive of taking intra-oral radiographs. Soc Sci Med 2006, 63:1889-1899. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.005, 16843579.
45. Walker A, Watson M, Grimshaw J, Bond C. Applying the theory of planned behaviour to pharmacists' beliefs and intentions about the treatment of vaginal candidiasis with non-prescription medicines. Family Practice 2004, 21:1-7.
46. Walker AE, Grimshaw JM, Armstrong EM. Salient beliefs and intentions to prescribeantibiotics for patients with a sore throat. British Journal of Health Psychology 2001, 6:347-360. 10.1348/135910701169250, 12614509.
47. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis J, kaner EF, Dickinson HO, Beyer F, et al. Do self-reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: A systematic review. Implementation Science 2006, 1:28. 10.1186/1748-5908-1-28, 1664582, 17118180.
48. Boyko JA, Lavis JN, Souza NM. Reliability of a Tool for Measuring Theory of Planned Behaviour Constructs for use in Evaluating Research Use in Policymaking 2010, Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University.
49. Streiner DL, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use 2008, New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 4.
50. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data 2002, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2.
51. Collins KMT, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Jiao QG. A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007, 1:267-294.
52. Patton M. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods 1990, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53. Sandelowski M. Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health 2000, 23:246-255. 10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H, 21623181.
54. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative methods in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity 2002, 36:391-409. 10.1023/A:1020909529486, 21623610.
55. Creswell JW. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions 1998, London: Sage Publications.
56. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000, 320:114-116. 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114, 1117368, 10625273.
57. Mitton C, Adair CE, McKenzie E, Patten SB, Wayne Perry B. Knowledge transfer and exchange: Review and synthesis of the literature. Milbank Quarterly 2007, 85:729-768. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00506.x, 18070335.
58. Lavis JN, Wilson MG, Grimshaw J, Haynes RB, Hanna S, Raina P, et al. Effects of an evidence service on healthcare policymakers' use research evidence: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implementation Science
59. Dobbins M, Robeson P, Ciliska D, Hanna S, Cameron R, O'Mara L, et al. A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implementation Science 2009, 4:23. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-23, 2680804, 19397820.