Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands-associations with stage at diagnosis and survival

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 517-525

  Aarts, M J ^a   Voogd, A C ^a,b   Duijm, L E M ^c   Coebergh, J W W ^a,d   Louwman, W J ^a,d  

^a The Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Mass screening; Participation; Socioeconomic factors; Stage at diagnosis; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURVIVAL RATE;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NETHERLANDS; PROGNOSIS; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 79959700493     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1363-z     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. J Kim SN Jang 2008 Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women: trends from 2000 to 2005 J Prev Med Public Health 41 186 194 18515996 10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.186
2. K Moser J Patnick V Beral 2009 Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data BMJ 338 2025 10.1136/bmj.b2025
3. ME Peek JH Han 2004 Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications J Gen Intern Med 19 184 194 15009798 (Pubitemid 38368467)
4. S Zackrisson M Lindstrom M Moghaddassi I Andersson L Janzon 2007 Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis Scand J Public Health 35 548 554 17852976 10.1080/14034940701291716 (Pubitemid 47470888)
5. SO Dalton M During L Ross K Carlsen PB Mortensen J Lynch C Johansen 2006 The relation between socioeconomic and demographic factors and tumour stage in women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark, 1983-1999 Br J Cancer 95 653 659 16909141 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603294 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rhs1Squw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44325908)
6. U Macleod S Ross C Gillis A McConnachie C Twelves GC Watt 2000 Socio-economic deprivation and stage of disease at presentation in women with breast cancer Ann Oncol 11 105 107 10690397 10.1023/A:1008385321476 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lsV2rtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30084589)
7. CT Schrijvers JP Mackenbach JM Lutz MJ Quinn MP Coleman 1995 Deprivation, stage at diagnosis and cancer survival Int J Cancer 63 324 329 7591225 10.1002/ijc.2910630303 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FntFSjtg%3D%3D
8. CT Schrijvers JW Coebergh LH van der Heijden JP Mackenbach 1995 Socioeconomic variation in cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands, 1980-1989 Cancer 75 2946 2953 7773946 10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2946:: AID-CNCR2820751223>3.0.CO;2-6 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3pt1aksg%3D%3D
9. SO Dalton L Ross M During K Carlsen PB Mortensen J Lynch C Johansen 2007 Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer-a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983-1999 Int J Cancer 121 2524 2531 17680561 10.1002/ijc.22979 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtlShtbzF (Pubitemid 350022424)
10. WJ Louwman LV van de Poll-Franse J Fracheboud JA Roukema JW Coebergh 2007 Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study Breast Cancer Res Treat 105 369 375 17211536 10.1007/s10549-006-9464-9 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2srnslajsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47596453)
11. J Gentil-Brevet M Colonna A Danzon P Grosclaude G Chaplain M Velten F Bonnetain P Arveux 2008 The influence of socio-economic and surveillance characteristics on breast cancer survival: a French population-based study Br J Cancer 98 217 224 18182980 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604163 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1c%2Fhs1SqtQ%3D%3D
12. Bastiaannet E, de Craen AJ, Kuppen PJ, Aarts MJ, van der Geest LG, van de Velde CJ, Westendorp RG, Liefers GJ (2010) Socioeconomic differences in survival among breast cancer patients in the Netherlands not explained by tumor size. Breast Cancer Res Treat PMID: 21076863 [Epub ahead of print]
13. F Kaffashian S Godward T Davies L Solomon J McCann SW Duffy 2003 Socioeconomic effects on breast cancer survival: proportion attributable to stage and morphology Br J Cancer 89 1693 1696 14583771 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601339 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3srgs1Gqsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 37464141)
14. AG Carnon A Ssemwogerere DW Lamont DJ Hole EA Mallon WD George GR Gillis 1994 Relation between socioeconomic deprivation and pathological prognostic factors in women with breast cancer BMJ 309 1054 1057 7950739 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FjvVWlsA%3D%3D
15. WJ Louwman MJ Aarts S Houterman FJ van Lenthe JW Coebergh ML Janssen-Heijnen 2010 A 50% higher prevalence of life-shortening chronic conditions among cancer patients with low socioeconomic status Br J Cancer 103 1742 1748 20978508 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605949 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cbosFGgtA%3D%3D
16. BoBZ: Jaarverslag 2007 [in Dutch], 2007
17. Sobin L, Wittekind C (1997) UICC International Union against cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th edn. Wiley-Liss, Geneva, Switzerland
18. ME Charlson P Pompei KL Ales CR MacKenzie 1987 A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 373 383 3558716 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 1:STN:280:DyaL2s7ms1GnsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 17055592)
19. C Van Duin I Keij 2002 Sociaal-economische status indicator op postcodeniveau [in Dutch] Maandstatistiek van de bevolking 50 32 35
20. S Zackrisson I Andersson J Manjer L Janzon 2004 Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma Int J Cancer 108 754 760 14696103 10.1002/ijc.11622 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmvFWlsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38076408)
21. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (2009) Breast screening programme. NHS, England
22. I Vejborg AH Olsen MB Jensen F Rank UB Tange E Lynge 2002 Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991-99 J Med Screen 9 115 119 12370322 10.1136/jms.9.3.115 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38nltFSmsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 35205233)
23. M von Euler-Chelpin AH Olsen S Njor I Vejborg W Schwartz E Lynge 2006 Women's patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark Eur J Epidemiol 21 203 209 10.1007/s10654-006-0002-1
24. ML Bare J Montes R Florensa M Sentis L Donoso 2003 Factors related to non-participation in a population-based breast cancer screening programme Eur J Cancer Prev 12 487 494 14639126 10.1097/00008469-200312000-00007 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2Fpt1SnsQ%3D%3D
25. N Duport R Ancelle-Park 2006 Do socio-demographic factors influence mammography use of French women? Analysis of a French cross-sectional survey Eur J Cancer Prev 15 219 224 16679864 10.1097/01.cej.0000198902.78420.de (Pubitemid 43791767)
26. M von Euler-Chelpin AH Olsen S Njor A Jensen I Vejborg W Schwartz E Lynge 2008 Does educational level determine screening participation? Eur J Cancer Prev 17 273 278 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f0c017 (Pubitemid 351549669)
27. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer prevention & early detection facts & figures 2009. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
28. SS Coughlin RJ Uhler JK Bobo L Caplan 2004 Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000 Cancer Causes Control 15 159 170 15017128 10.1023/B:CACO.0000019496.30145.62 (Pubitemid 38445362)
29. NR Cook BA Rosner SE Hankinson GA Colditz 2009 Mammographic screening and risk factors for breast cancer Am J Epidemiol 170 1422 1432 19875646 10.1093/aje/kwp304
30. N Lale F Öry S Detmar 2003 Factors associated with non-participation of Turkish women to cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands Tijdschrift Sociale Geneeskunde 81 184 188
31. K Stein L Zhao C Crammer T Gansler 2007 Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of beliefs regarding cancer risks Cancer 110 1139 1148 17657733 10.1002/cncr.22880 (Pubitemid 47312881)
32. J Wardle A Steptoe 2003 Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles J Epidemiol Community Health 57 440 443 12775791 10.1136/jech.57.6.440 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3lt1Wnuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 36713007)
33. O Visser AM van Peppen FG Ory FE van Leeuwen 2005 Results of breast cancer screening in first generation migrants in Northwest Netherlands Eur J Cancer Prev 14 251 255 15901994 10.1097/00008469-200506000-00009 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzpvFCnsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40780449)
34. A Jensen AH Olsen M von Euler-Chelpin S Helle Njor I Vejborg E Lynge 2005 Do nonattenders in mammography screening programmes seek mammography elsewhere? Int J Cancer 113 464 470 15455383 10.1002/ijc.20604 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhsFag (Pubitemid 40038716)
35. J Adams M White D Forman 2004 Are there socioeconomic gradients in stage and grade of breast cancer at diagnosis? Cross sectional analysis of UK cancer registry data BMJ 329 142 15175228 10.1136/bmj.38114.679387.AE
36. JL Bulliard C Ducros C Jemelin B Arzel G Fioretta F Levi 2009 Effectiveness of organised versus opportunistic mammography screening Ann Oncol 20 1199 1202 19282467 10.1093/annonc/mdn770
37. L Cortesi VE Chiuri S Ruscelli V Bellelli R Negri I Rashid C Cirilli A Fracca E Gallo M Federico 2006 Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based study BMC Cancer 6 17 16430776 10.1186/1471-2407-6-17
38. A Taylor KK Cheng 2003 Social deprivation and breast cancer J Public Health Med 25 228 233 14575198 10.1093/pubmed/fdg072 (Pubitemid 37237074)
39. P Symonds B Bolger D Hole JH Mao T Cooke 2000 Advanced-stage cervix cancer: rapid tumour growth rather than late diagnosis Br J Cancer 83 566 568 10944592 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1336 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjt1OntA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30636293)
40. CT Schrijvers JP Mackenbach 1994 Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected] J Epidemiol Community Health 48 441 446 7964352 10.1136/jech.48.5.441 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FltlGqsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24313745)
41. JS Kaufman RF Maclehose S Kaufman 2004 A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation Epidemiol Perspect Innov 1 4 15507130 10.1186/1742-5573-1-4 (Pubitemid 40404935)
42. DP Weller J Patnick HM McIntosh AJ Dietrich 2009 Uptake in cancer screening programmes Lancet Oncol 10 693 699 19573798 10.1016/S1470-2045(09) 70145-7
43. Bos V, Kunst AE, Mackenbach J (2000) Nationale gegevens over sociaal-economische sterfteverschillen op basis van informatie over kleine geografische eenheden [in Dutch]. In: Verslag aan de programmacommissie sociaal-economische gezondheidsverschillen II. Instituut Maatschappelijke Gezondheidszorg, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
44. Bos V, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP (2001) De omvang van sociaal-economische verschillen gemeten op buurtniveau: vergelijking met schattingen op basis van informatie op individueel niveau [in Dutch]. In: Stronks K (ed) Sociaal-economische gezondheidsverschillen: van verklaren naar verkleinen. Zon/MW, Den Haag, pp 8-20
45. J Smits I Keij GP Westert 2001 Effecten van sociaal-economische status van kleine, middelgrote en grote geografische eenheden op de sterfte [in Dutch] Maandstatistiek van de bevolking 11 4 10