Awake at the switch: Improving fish consumption advisories for at-risk women

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 409, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 3257-3266

  Teisl, Mario F ^a   Fromberg, Eric ^b   Smith, Andrew E ^b   Boyle, Kevin J ^c   Engelberth, Haley M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b Maine Department of Health and Human Services   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Methylmercury; Pregnant women; Risk communication; Switching behavior

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL CHANGES; CONTROL AND PREVENTION; FISH ADVISORY; FISH CONSUMPTION; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; HEALTH BENEFITS; HUMAN HEALTH; INFORMATION SOURCES; METHYL MERCURY; POOR PERFORMANCE; PREGNANT WOMAN; RISK COMMUNICATION; SWITCHING BEHAVIORS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DISEASE CONTROL; FISH; HEALTH; MERCURY COMPOUNDS; SWITCHING;

HEALTH RISKS;

METHYLMERCURY;

FISH; FOOD CONSUMPTION; HEALTH RISK; METHYLMERCURY; PREGNANCY; WOMENS HEALTH;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; FEMALE; FISH; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD SAFETY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NUTRITIONAL HEALTH; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; DIET; FEMALE; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOODBORNE DISEASES; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MATERNAL EXPOSURE; METHYLMERCURY COMPOUNDS; PREGNANCY; SEAFOOD;

EID: 79959686696     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Akabas S.R., Deckelbaum R.J. n-3 fatty acids: recommendations for therapeutics and prevention. Am J Clin Nutr 2006, 83(6). S1451-1451S.
2. Anderson H.A., Hanrahan L.P., Smith A., Draheim L., Kanarek M., Olsen J. The role of sport-fish consumption advisories in methylmercury risk communication: a 1998-1999 12-state survey of women age 18-45. Environ Res 2004, 95(3):315-324.
3. Bostrom A., Löfstedt R.E. Communicating risk: wireless and hardwired. Risk Anal 2003, 23(2):241-248.
4. Burger J. Fishing, fish consumption, and knowledge about advisories in college students and others in central New Jersey. Environ Res 2005, 98:268-275.
5. Burger J., Campbell K.R. 'Fishing and consumption patterns of anglers adjacent to the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee: higher income anglers ate more fish and are more at risk. J Risk Research 2008, 11(3):335-350.
6. Burger J., Gochfeld M. A framework and information needs for the management of the risks from consumption of self-caught fish. Environ Res 2006, 101:275-285.
7. Burger J., Gochfeld M. Knowledge about fish consumption advisories: a risk communication failure within a university population. Sci Total Environ 2008, 390:346-354.
8. Burger J., Gochfeld M. Perceptions of the risks and benefits of fish consumption: individual choices to reduce risk and increase health benefits. Environ Res 2008, 109(3):343-349.
9. Burger J., McDermott M.H., Chess C., Bochenek E., Perez-Lugo M., Pflugh K. Evaluating risk communication about fish consumption advisories: efficacy of a brochure versus a classroom lesson in Spanish and English. Risk Anal 2003, 23(4):791-803.
10. Burger J., Stern A.H., Gochfeld M. Mercury in commercial fish: optimizing individual choices to reduce risk. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113(3):266-271.
11. Chess C., Burger J., McDermott M.H. Speaking like a state: communication about fish advisories. Soc Nat Resour 2005, 18(3):267-278.
12. Cleland L.G., James M.J., Proudman S.M. The role of fish oils in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Drugs 2003, 63(9):845-853.
13. Cohen J.T., Bellinger D.C., Connor W.E., Kris-Etherton P.M., Lawrence R.S., Savitz D.A., et al. A quantitative risk-benefit analysis of changes in population fish consumption. Am J Prev Med 2005, 29(4):325-334.
14. Connelly N.A., Knuth B.A. Evaluating risk communication: examining target audience perceptions about four presentation formats for fish consumption health advisory information. Risk Anal 1998, 18(5):649-659.
15. Davidson P.W., Myers G.J., Weiss B. Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics 2004, 113:1023-1029.
16. Dawson J., Sheeshka J., Cole D.C., Kraft D., Waugh A. Fishers weigh in: benefits and risks of eating Great Lakes fish from the consumer's perspective. Agric and Hum Values 2008, 25:349-364.
17. Frewer L.J., Howard C., Hedderley D., Shepherd R. Consumer attitudes towards different food processing technologies used in cheese production-the influence of consumer benefit. Food Quality Preference 1997, 8(4):271-280.
18. Genuis S.J. To sea or not to sea: benefits and risks of gestational fish consumption. Reprod Toxicol 2008, 26:81-85.
19. Ginsberg G.L., Toal B.F. Development of a single-meal fish consumption advisory for methyl mercury. Risk Anal 2000, 20(1):41-47.
20. Habron G., Barbier M., Kinnunen R. Local understanding of fish consumption advisory risks in Michigan's Upper Peninsula: the role of structure, culture, and agency. Rural Sociology 2008, 73(2):275-299.
21. Halkier B. Consequences of the politicization of consumption: the example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. J Environ Policy Plan 1999, 1:25-41.
22. Hibbeln J.R., Davis J.M., Steer C., Emmett P., Rovers I., Williams C., et al. Maternal seafood consumption in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood (ALSPAC study): an observational cohort study. Lancet 2007, 369:578-585.
23. Seafood choices: balancing benefits and risks. Committee on Nutrient Relationships in Seafood: selections to balance benefits and risks. Food and Nutrition Board 2007, IMNA (Institute of Medicine of the National Academies), The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C, Available at:, Accessed: Dec. 13, 2010. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11762&page=15, M.C. Nesheim, A.L. Yaktine (Eds.).
24. Imm P., Knobeloch L., Anderson H.A. Fish consumption and advisory awareness in the Great Lakes Basin. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113(10):1325-1329.
25. Jakus P.M., Dadakas D., Fly J.M. Fish consumption advisories: incorporating angler-specific knowledge, habits, and catch rates in a site choice model. Am J Agric Econ 1998, 80(5):1019-1024.
26. Johnsson C., Schutz A., Sallsten G. Impact of consumption of freshwater fish on mercury levels in hair, blood, urine, and alveolar air. J Toxicol Environ Health-Part A 2005, 68:129-141.
27. Knobeloch L., Anderson H.A., Imm P., Peters D., Smith A. Fish consumption, advisory awareness, and hair mercury levels among women of childbearing age. Environ Res 2005, 97:220-227.
28. Knuth B.A., Connelly N.A., Sheeshka J., Patterson J. Weighing health benefit and health risk information when consuming sport-caught fish. Risk Anal 2003, 23(6):1185-1197.
29. Lapka C., Jupka K., Wray R.J., Jacobsen H. Applying cognitive response testing in message development and pre-testing. Health Educ Res 2008, 23(3):467-476.
30. Lyman F. How much mercury is in the fish you eat? Doctors recommend consuming seafood, but some fish are tainted April 4, 2003. Available at:, Accessed on: Sept. 21, 2004. http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3076632/.
31. MacDonald H.F., Boyle K.J. Effect of a statewide sport fish consumption advisory on open-water fishing in Maine. North Am J Fisheries Management 1997, 17:687-695.
32. MacNair D.J., Desvousges W.H. The economics of fish consumption advisories: insights from revealed and stated preference data. Land Econ 2007, 83(4):600-616.
33. Mahaffey K.R., Clickner R.P., Bodurow C.C. Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999 and 2000. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112(5):562-570.
34. Marette S., Roosen J., Blanchemanche S., Verger P. The choice of fish species: an experiment measuring the impact of risk and benefit information. J of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2008, 33(1):1-18.
35. McCann P. Minnesota Fish Consumption Advisory Evaluation in Proceedings of the 2007 National Forum on Contaminants in Fish 2007, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, Publication number: EPA-823-R-07-008. Sept. 2007.
36. McDermott M.H., Chess C., Perez-Lugo M., Pflugh K., Bochenek E., Burger J. Communicating a complex message to the population most at risk: an outreach strategy for fish consumption advisories. Appl Environ Educ Commun International J 2003, 2(1):39-48.
37. Mozaffarian D., Rimm E.B. Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits. J Am Med Assoc 2006, 18, 296(15):1885-1899.
38. Making Health Communication Programs Work N.C.I. (National Cancer Institute), Available at:, Accessed on Dec. 13 2010. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/cancerlibrary/pinkbook.
39. Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Committee on the Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council 2000, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
40. Oken E., Kleinman K.P., Berland W.E., Simon S.R., Rich-Edwards J.W., Gillman M.W. Decline in fish consumption among pregnant women after a national mercury advisory. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 102(2):346-351.
41. Park S., Johnson M.A. Awareness of fish advisories and mercury exposure in women of childbearing age. Brief Crit Rev 2006, (I):250-256.
42. Pflugh K.K., Lurig L., vonHagen L.A., vonHagen S., Burger J. Urban angler's perceptions of risk from contaminated fish. Sci Total Environ 1999, 228:203-218.
43. Pieniak Z., Verbeke W., Scholderer J., Brunsø K., Olsen S.O. European consumers' use of and trust in information sources about fish. Food Quality Preference 2007, 18:1050-1063.
44. Roosen J., Marette S., Blanchemanche S., Verger P. Does health information matter for modifying consumption? A field experiment measuring the impact of risk information on fish consumption. Working Paper 06-WP-434 2006, CARD, Iowa State University.
45. Scherer A.C., Tsuchiya A., Younglove L.R., Burbacher T.M., Faustman E.M. Environ Health Perspect 2008, 116(12):1598-1606.
46. Shimshack J.P., Ward M.B. J Health Econ 2010, 29:674-685.
47. Shimshack J.P., Ward M.B., Beatty T.K.M. Mercury advisories: information, education, and fish consumption. J Environ Econ Management 2007, 53:158-179.
48. Silvera E., Kaslowa J., Leeb D., Lee S., Tan M.L., Weis E., et al. Fish consumption and advisory awareness among low-income women in California's Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Environ Res 2007, 104:410-419.
49. Surgan M.H., Davis J., Congdon T., Kellerman L. Fish consumption advisories: one agency's focus on families. Soc Nat Resour 2008, 21(3):266-270.
50. Teisl, M.F., N.E. Bockstael, A.S. Levy. Preferences for food labels: a discrete choice approach. strategy and policy in the food system: emerging issues 1996. Proceedings of the NE-165 (Private Strategies, Public Policies and Food System Performance) Annual Meeting.
51. Teisl, M.F., E. Fromberg, K.J. Boyle, A.E. Smith, 2010. Measuring the impact of Maine's 'safe eating guidelines': a fish consumption advisory for at-risk women. University of Maine, School of Economics Staff Paper # 585.
52. Uauy R., Dangour A.D. Nutrition in brain development and aging: role of essential fatty acids. Nutr Rev 2006, 64(5,2):S24-S33.
53. Maine Quick Facts (2009 estimates) U.S. Census, Available at:, Accessed on April 29th, 2011. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/23000.html.
54. Joint federal advisory for mercury in fish 2004, U.S.F.D.A. & U.S.E.P.A. (Food and Drug Administration & Environmental Protection Agency), US Food and Drug Administration, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
55. Vardeman J.E., Aldoory L. A qualitative study of how women make meaning of contradictory media messages about the risks of eating fish. Health Commun 2008, 23(3):282-291.
56. Verger P., Houdart S., Marette S., Roosen J., Blanchemanche S. Impact of a risk-benefit advisory on fish consumption and dietary exposure to methylmercury in France. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2007, 48:259-269.
57. Westphal L.M., Longoni M., LeBlanc C.L., Wali A. Anglers' appraisals of the risks of eating sport-caught fish from industrial areas: lessons from Chicago's Calumet Region. Hum Ecol Rev 2008, 15(1):46-62.
58. Yess N.J. U.S. Food and Drug Administration survey of methyl mercury in canned tuna. J AOAC Int 1993, 76(1):36-38.