Supplemental irrigation effect on canola yield components under semiarid climatic conditions

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 98, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1403-1408

  Dogan, E ^a   Copur, O ^a   Kahraman, A ^a   Kirnak, H ^a   Guldur, M E ^a  

^a HARRAN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Canola; Semiarid climatic conditions; Sprinkler irrigation; Water stress

Indexed keywords

ABOVE GROUND BIOMASS; BRASSICA NAPUS; CANOLA; CLASS-A PAN; CROP WATER USE; CROP YIELD; DROUGHT STRESS; GROWING SEASON; HARRAN PLAIN; HARVEST INDEX; IRRIGATION TREATMENTS; IRRIGATION WATERS; OPTIMUM YIELD; PLANT HEIGHT; SEED WEIGHT; SEMIARID CLIMATIC CONDITION; SPRINKLER IRRIGATION; SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIGATION; WATER STRESS; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; YIELD COMPONENTS;

CROPS; CULTIVATION; PLANTS (BOTANY); WATER SUPPLY;

SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (IRRIGATION);

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; CANOLA; CROP YIELD; DROUGHT STRESS; GROWING SEASON; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; SEASONAL VARIATION; SEMIARID REGION; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER STRESS; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; YIELD RESPONSE;

HARRAN PLAIN; SANLIURFA; TURKEY; URFA;

BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; HORDEUM; LENS CULINARIS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 79959663338     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ahmadi M., Bahrani M.J. Yield and yield components of rapeseed as influenced by water stress at different growth stages and nitrogen levels. Am-Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2009, 5(6):761-775.
2. Angadi S.V., McConkey B.G., Ulrich D., Cutforth H.W., Miller P.R., Entz M.H., Brandt S.A., Volkmar K. Developing viable cropping options for the semiarid prairies. Proj. Rep. Agric. Agri-Food Can., Swift Current, SK 1999.
3. Abuelos G.S., Bryla D.R., Cook C.G. Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California. Ind. Crops Prod. 2002, 15:237-345.
4. Ariolu H.H., Kolsarici O., Goksu A.T., Gulluoglu L., Arslan M., Caliskan S., Sogut T., Kurt C., Arslanoglu F. Yag bitkileri uretiminin artirilmasi olanaklari. Ziraat Muhendisligi VII. Teknik Kongresi. Bildiriler Kitabi-1 2010, 7:361-376.
5. Bahceci I., Nacar S. Subsurface drainage and salt leaching in irrigated land in south-east Turkey. Irrig. Drain. 2009, 58:346-356.
6. BSYD Vegetable Oil Industrialists Association Annual Report 2011, http://www.bysd.org.tr/Istatistikler.aspx (accessed 21.03.11.).
7. Cheema M.A., Malik M.A., Hussain A., Shah S.H., Basra S.M.A. Effects of time and rate of nitrogen and phosphorus application on the growth and the seed and oil yields of canola (Brassica napus L.). J. Argon. Crop Sci. 2001, 186:103-110.
8. Costa W.A.J.M., Shanmugathasan K.N. Physiology of yield determination of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under different irrigation regimes in the sub-humid zone of Sri Lanka. Field Crops Res. 2002, 75:23-35.
9. Dogan E., Kirnak H., Copur O. Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages and CROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Res. 2007, 103(2):154-159.
10. Doorenbos J., Pruitt W.O. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. No: 24, Roma 1992.
11. El Hafid R., Smith D.H., Karrou M., Samir K. Physiological responses of spring durum wheat cultivars to early-season drought in a Mediterranean environment. Ann. Bot. 1998, 54:537-541.
12. FAO Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No: 61, Rome, Italy 2002, K.K. Tanji, C.N. Kielen (Eds.).
13. Gan Y., Angadi S.V., Cutforth H., Potts D., Angadi V.V., McDonald C.L. Canola and mustard response to short periods of temperature and water stress at different developmental stages. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 84:697-704.
14. Hati K.M., Mandal K.G., Misra A.K., Ghosh P.K., Acharya C.L. Evapo-transpiration, water use efficiency, moisture use and yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under varying levels of irrigation and nutrient management in vertisol. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2001, 74(6):339-342.
15. Huhn M. Character associations among grain yield, biological yield and harvest index. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 1991, 166:308-317.
16. Jensen C.R., Mogensen V.O., Mortensen G., Fieldsend J.K., Milford G.F.J., Andersen M.N., Thage J.H. Seed glucosinolate, oil and protein contents of field-grown rape (Brassica napus L.) affected by soil drying and evaporative demand. Field Crops Res. 1996, 47:93-105.
17. Johnston A.M., Tanaka D.L., Miller P.R., Brandt S.A., Nielsen D.C., Lafond G.P., Riveland N.R. Oilseed crops for semiarid cropping systems in the northern Great Plains. Agron. J. 2002, 94:231-240.
18. Kar G., Kumar A., Martha M. Water use efficiency and crop coefficients and dry season oilseed crops. Agric. Water Manage. 2007, 87:73-82.
19. Karam F., Masaad R., Sfeir T., Mounzer O., Rouphael Y. Evapotranspiration and seed yield of field grown soybean under deficit irrigation conditions. Agric. Water Manage. 2005, 75:226-244.
20. Kipkorir E.C., Raes D., Massawe B. Seasonal water production functions and yield response factors for maize and onion inperkerra, Kenya. Agric. Water Manage. 2002, 56:229-240.
21. Mandal K.G., Hati K.M., Misra A.K., Bandyopadhyay K.K. Assessment of irrigation and nutrient effects on growth, yield and water use efficacy of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in central India. Agric. Water Manage. 2006, 85:279-286.
22. Mendham N.J., Salsbury P.A. Physiology: crop development, growth and yield. Brassica Oilseeds - Production and Utilization 1995, 11-63. CAB International, Cambridge, UK. D. Kimber, D.I. McGregor (Eds.).
23. Muhammad T., Ali A., Nadeem A., Tanveer A., Sabir Q.M. Performance of canola (Brassica napus L.) under different irrigation levels. Pak. J. Bot. 2007, 39:739-746.
24. Rahnema A.A., Bakhshandeh A.M. Determination of optimum irrigation level and compatible canola varieties in the Mediterranean environment. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2006, 5(3):543-546.
25. Reddi G.H.S., Reddi T.Y. Irrigation of principal crops. Efficient Use of Irrigation Water 1995, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, pp. 229-259. 2nd ed.
26. Richards R.A., Thurling N. Variation between and within species of rapeseed (B. campestris and Brassica napus), in response to drought stress. I. Sensitivity at different stages of development. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 29:177-469.
27. Sharma D.K., Kumar A. Effect of water stress on plant water relations and yield of varieties of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea subsp. juncea). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 1989, 59:281-285.
28. Sinaki J.M., Heravan E.M., Rad A.H.S., Noormohammadi G., Zarei G. The effect of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus L.). Am-Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2007, 2(4):417-422.
29. Singh P.K., Mishra A.K., Imtaz M. Moisture stress and the water use efficacy of mustard. Agric. Water Manage. 1991, 23:225-232.
30. Smis J.R., Solu D.J., Whichman D.M., Kushnk G.D., Welty L.E. Canola variety yield trials. Montana Agron. Res. 1993, 10:15-20.
31. State Hydraulic Works (DSİ) Sanliurfa Harran ovasi drenaj ve tuzluluk sorunlari izleme raporu, Devlet Su Isleri XIV. Bölge Müdürlügü 2004.
32. Svecnjak Z., Rengel Z. Canola cultivars differ in nitrogen utilization efficiency at vegetative stage. Field Crop Res. 2006, 97:221-226.
33. Tahir M., Ali A., Nadeem M.A., Tanveer A., Sabir Q.M. Performance of canola (Brassica napus L.) under different irrigation levels. Pak. J. Bot. 2007, 39(3):739-746.
34. Taylor A.J., Smith C.J., Wilson I.B. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, oil content, nitrogen accumulation and water use of canola (Brassica napus L.). Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1991, 29(3):249-260.
35. Wahid M.A., Cheema M.A., Malik M.A., Ashraf M. Comparative performance of canola hybrids in response to different phosphatic fertilizers. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009, 11(3):305-310.