The strategic con¢guration of themixed corporation: For an organizational distinction public vs private;La Configuration Stratégique de l'entreprise mixte: pour la distinction public vs privé au plan organisationnel

Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 33-66

  Bédard, Michel G ^a   Tereraho, Max N ^a   Bernier, Luc ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE NATIONALE D'ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959637004     PISSN: 13704788     EISSN: 14678292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8292.00072     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. AHARONI Y., 1986,'The state owned enterprise and private investors', in Aharoni Y., The Evolution and Management of State-Owned Enterprises, Cambridge MA, Bellinger.
2. ALLAIRE Y. et FIRSIROTU M.E., 1988, 'Shaping the firm's destiny', Document de travail, Centre de Recherche en Gestion, Université du Qué bec a' Montré al, No 6-88.
3. ALLAIRE Y. et FIRSIROTU M.E., 1989, 'Comment cré er des organisations performantes: L'art subtil des straté gies radicales', Revue Internationale de Gestion, Septembre.
4. BAYSINGER B.D., KOSNIK R., et TURK T.A.D., 1991,'Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R et D strategy', Academy of Management Journal, 34, 1, Mars, 205-14.
5. BEDARD M.G., 1989,'La culture straté gique de la Sociétédes alcools du Québec', The' se de doctorat, Universitédu Québec a' Montréal.
6. BEDARD M.G. 1991, Contexte de propriétéet culture d'entreprise: le cas de la SAQ, Montréal, Gaëtan Morin Editeur.
7. BEDARD M.G. 1993, 'Mode' le multifactoriel d'analyse de l'implication socio- économique des entreprises privatisées', Actes du Colloque, Association des Sciences Administratives du Canada, Lac Louise (Alberta), University of Calgary, Mai-Juin, Best Business Policy PaperAward.
8. BERNIER L., 1989, 'Soldiers of Fortune: Public Enterprises as Instruments of Public Policy', The' se de doctorat, Northwestern University, Illinois.
9. BOARDMAN A.E. etVINING A.R., 1989,'Ownership and performance in competitive environments: a comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-Owned enterprises', Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1, Avril, 1-33.
10. BOARDMAN A.E., FREEMAN R. et ECKEL C., 1986, 'The price of government ownership: a study of the Domtar takeover', Journal of Public Economics, 31, 269-285.
11. BOARDMAN A.E., ECKEL C., LINDE M.A. et VINING A.R., 1983, 'An overview of ́mixed enterprises in Canada', Business Quarterly, 48, 2, Eté, 101-106.
12. BROOKS S.R., 1985a,'Direct investment by the state: mixed enterprise in Canada', The' se de doctorat, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario.
13. BROOKS S.R., 1985b,'The mixed ownership corporation as an instrument of public policy', Miméo, Brock University, Juillet, 34.
14. BROOKS S.R., 1987,Who's in Charge? The Mixed Ownership Corporation in Canada, Halifax,The Institute of Research on Public Policy.
15. CONGLETON R.D., 1989, 'Monitoring rent-seeking managers: advantages of diffuse ownership', Canadian Journal of Economics, 22, 3, Aou" t, 652-72.
16. CONTRACTOR F.J., 1990, 'Ownership patterns of U.S. joint-ventures abroad and the liberalization of foreign government regulations in the 1980s: evidence from the benchmark surveys', Journal of International Business Studies, 21, 1, 55-73.
17. COURSEY D. et RAINEY H.G., 1990,'Perceptions of personnel system constraints in public, private, and hybrid organizations', Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10, 2, Printemps, 54-71.
18. ECKEL C.C. etVERMAELEN T., 1986,'Internal regulation: the effects of government ownership on the value of the firm', Journal of Law and Economics, 29, 2, Oct., 381-403.
19. ECKEL C.C. et VINING A.R., 1985, 'Elements of a theory of mixed enterprise', Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 32, 1, Février, 82-93.
20. EICHHORN P., 1991, 'Public enterprises in Germany: definition, ́ownership, objectives and control', Annales de l'Economie Publique, Sociale et Coopérative, 62, 1, 63-78.
21. EMMERT M. et CROW M.M., 1987, 'Public-private cooperation and hybrid organizations', Journal of Management, 13, 1, Printemps, 55-67.
22. EMMERT M. et CROW M.M., 1988,'Public, private and hybrid organizations: an empirical examination of the role of publicness', Administration and Society, 20, 2, Aou" t, 216-44.
23. FREEMAN R.E., 1984, Strategic Management: A StakeholderApproach, Boston/Toronto, Pitman.
24. GEDAJLOVIC E.R., 1993, ''A cross-national study of corporate governance, strategy and firm performance', The' se de doctorat, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec.
25. GERINGER M.J. et FRAYNE C.A., 1990,'Human resource management and international joint-venture control: a parent company ́perspective', Management International Review, Edition spéciale, 103-20.
26. GERMANN R.E., 1987, 'L'amalgame public-privé: L'administration para-étatique en Suisse', Lausanne, Cahier de l'IDHEAP, No 29.
27. GRAY B. et YAN A., 1991, 'A Negotiations Model of Joint-venture Formation, Structure and Performance: Implications for Global Management', Mimeo, Center for Research in Con£ict and Negotiation, The Smeal College of Business Administration, The Pennsylvania State University.
28. HAFSI T., 1990, Gérer l'entreprise publique, Alger, O/ce des Publications Universitaires.
29. HILL C.W.L. et SNELL S.A., 1989,'Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity', Academy of Management Journal, 32, 1, 25-46.
30. KHANDWALLA P.N., 1977, The Design of Organizations, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.
31. LAUX J.K. et MOLOT M.A., 1988, State Capitalism: Public Enterprise in Canada, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.
32. LORANGE P. et PROBST G.J.B., 1987,'Joint-ventures as self-organizing systems: a key to successful joint-venture design and ́implementation', Columbia Journal of World Business, 22, 2, Eté, 71-7.
33. LOVELESS S.C., 1985, 'Sector Status, Structure, and Performance: A Comparison of Public and Private Research Units', The' se de doctorat, Syracuse University.
34. MASCARENHAS B., 1989,'Domains of state-owned, privately held, and publicly traded firms in international competition', Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 4, 582-97.
35. MARJIT S., 1990, 'Rationalizing public-private joint-ventures in an open economy: a strategic approach', Journal of Development Economics (Pays-Bas), 33, 2, Oct., 377-83.
36. MARTINEZ Z.L., 1987, 'Multinational Parent Companies' In£uence over Human Resource Decisions of A/liates: U.S. Firms in Mexico', The' se de doctorat, University of South Carolina.
37. McKELVEY B., 1982, Organizational Systematics:Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification, San Francisco, University of California Press.
38. MINTZ J.M., 1978, 'Public-private mixed enterprises: the Canadian example', Document de travail, #325, Department of Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.
39. MINTZBERG H., 1979, The Structuring of Organizations, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
40. MINTZBERG H. (1990), Le management: voyage au centre des organisations, Paris, Les Editions des Organisations; Montréal, Agence d'Arc., Editions des Organisations; Montréal, Agence d'Arc.
41. MORGAN G., 1989, Images de l'organisation, Québec, Presses de l'UniversitéLaval/ESKA.
42. MUSOLF L.D., 1972, Mixed Enterprise: a Developmental Perspective, Lexington, Lexington Books.
43. PERRY J.L. et RAINEY H.G., 1988,'The public-private distinction in organization theory: a critique and research strategy', Academy of Management Review, 13, 2, Avril, 182-201.
44. PFEFFER J. et SALANCIK G.R., 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York, Harper.
45. POLTIER E., 1983, 'Les entreprises d'économie mixte: étude de droit suisse et de droit comparé', The' se de licence de doctorat, Universitéde Lausanne.
46. POWELL N.W., 1987, 'Hybrid organizational arrangements', California Management Review, 30, 1, 67-87.
47. POWELL T.E., Jr., 1987, 'Public and Private Administration: An Empirical Assessment of Convergence and Divergence', The' se de doctorat, University of Delaware.
48. PUGH D.S., HICKSON D.J. et HININGS C.R., 1969, 'An empirical taxonomy of structures of work organizations', Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 115-26.
49. SARKAR A.K. et VICQ J.G., 1992, The Accountability of Mixed Corporation, Ottawa, Canadian Centre for Management Development.
50. SPENCER D.L., 1959, India, Mixed Enterprises and Western Business, La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff.
51. TARASOFSKY A., 1987, 'Something Ventured: The CDC 1972-1985', Document de travail, No 330, Economic Council for Canada.
52. TERERAHO M. et BEDARD M., 1994, 'Privatisation et engagement sociopolitique de l'entreprise: enseignements de deux entreprises mixtes européennes', Document de travail, Centre de Recherche en Gestion, Universitédu Québec a' Montréal, No 10-94.
53. THOMSON S.,WRIGHT M. et ROBBIE K., 1990,'Management buy-out from the public sector: ownership form and incentive issue', Fiscal Studies, Royaume-Uni, 11, 3, Aou" t, 71-88.
54. TOULOUSE J.-M. et al., 1986, 'La propriétéet la stratégie des entreprises' in Les guerriers de l'émergence, Montréal, Québec- Amérique, 249-59.
55. TRIST E.L., 1976, 'A concept of organizational ecology', Australian Journal of Management, 2.
56. VERANEN J., 1987, The Ownership Function and the Performance of the Firm, Helsinki, The Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.
57. VIALLET C., 1983,'Resolution of con£icts of interest in the ownership of a firm: the case of mixed firm', Annals of Public and Cooperative Economy, Sept., 255-69.
58. WILLIAMSON O.E., 1991, 'Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives', Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269-96.
59. WILSON G.K., 1985, Business and Politics: AComparative Introduction, Chatham, Chatham House.
60. WITTMER D., 1991, 'Serving the people or serving for pay: reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers', Public Productivity and Management Review, 14, 4, Eté, 369-83.
61. ZEIRA Y. et SHENKAR O., 1990, 'Interactive and specific parent characteristics: implications for management and human resources in international joint-ventures', Management International Review.