Sustained motion perception deficit following optic neuritis: Behavioral and cortical evidence

Neurology

Volumn 76, Issue 24, 2011, Pages 2103-2111

  Raz, N ^a   Dotan, S ^a   Benoliel, T ^a   Chokron, S ^b   Ben Hur, T ^a   Levin, N ^a  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b Service de Neurologie   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OPTIC NEURITIS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION TEST; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEHAVIOR; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTIC NEURITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISION TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959631971     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821f4602     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Beck RW, Cleary PA, Backlund JC. The course of visual recovery after optic neuritis: experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1771-1778. (Pubitemid 24378857)
2. Cleary PA, Beck RW, Bourque LB, Backlund JC, Miskala PH. Visual symptoms after optic neuritis: results from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. J Neuroophthalmol 1997;17:18-23.
3. Grimsdale H. A note on Pulfrich's phenomenon with a suggestion on its possible clinical importance. Br J Ophthalmol 1925;9:63-65.
4. Frisen L, Hoyt WF, Bird AC, Weale RA. Diagnostic uses of the Pulfrich phenomenon. Lancet 1973;2:385-386.
5. Regan D, Kothe AC, Sharpe JA. Recognition of motiondefined shapes in patients with multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. Brain 1991;114:1129-1155.
6. Barton JJ, Rizzo M. Motion perception in optic neuropathy. Neurology 1994;44:273-278. (Pubitemid 24070966)
7. Born RT, Bradley DC. Structure and function of visual area MT. Annu Rev Neurosci 2005;28:157-189. (Pubitemid 41098903)
8. Werring DJ, Bullmore ET, Toosy AT, et al. Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:441-449. (Pubitemid 30248743)
9. Toosy AT, Hickman SJ, Miszkiel KA, et al. Adaptive cortical plasticity in higher visual areas after acute optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 2005;57:622-633. (Pubitemid 40628850)
10. Levin N, Orlov T, Dotan S, Zohary E. Normal and abnormal fMRI activation patterns in the visual cortex after recovery from optic neuritis. Neuroimage 2006;33:1161-1168. (Pubitemid 44708786)
11. Korsholm K, Madsen KH, Frederiksen JL, Skimminge A, Lund TE. Recovery from optic neuritis: an ROI-based analysis of LGN and visual cortical areas. Brain 2007;130: 1244-1253. (Pubitemid 47355949)
12. Jenkins TM, Toosy AT, Ciccarelli O, et al. Neuroplasticity predicts outcome of optic neuritis independent of tissue damage. Ann Neurol 2010;67:99-113.
13. Jones SJ, Brusa A. Neurophysiological evidence for longterm repair of MS lesions: implications for axon protection. J Neurol Sci 2003;206:193-198. (Pubitemid 36143727)
14. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. Improved assessment of significant activa-tion in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:636-647.
15. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 1999;10:385-396. (Pubitemid 29472824)
16. Budenz DL, Anderson DR, Varma R, et al. Determinants of normal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Stratus OCT. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1046-1052. (Pubitemid 46829361)
17. Trobe JD, Beck RW, Moke PS, Cleary PA. Contrast sensitivity and other vision tests in the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;121:547-553. (Pubitemid 26135863)
18. Balcer LJ, Baier ML, Pelak VS, et al. New low-contrast vision charts: reliability and test characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2000;6: 163-171. (Pubitemid 30392113)
19. Mowry EM, Loguidice MJ, Daniels AB, et al. Vision related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: correlation with new measures of low and high contrast letter acuity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:767-772.
20. Mantyjarvi M, Laitinen T. Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:261-266. (Pubitemid 32179506)
21. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J. Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. BMJ 1973;4: 661-664.
22. Chokron S, Perez C, Obadia M, Gaudry I, Laloum L, Gout O. From blindsight to sight: cognitive rehabilitation of visual field defects. Rest Neurol Neurosci 2008; 26:305-320.