Soldier-robot teams in future battlefields: An overview

Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 9-29

  Barnes, Michael J ^a   Evans III, A William ^b  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79959608900     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Arkin, R. C. (2007). Governing lethal behavior: Embedded ethics in hybrid deliberative reactive robot architecture (TR GIT-GVU-07-11). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
2. Barnes, M. (2003). The human dimension of battlefield visualization: Research and design issues (ARL-TR-2855). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
3. Barnes, M., Cosenzo, K., Jentsch F., Chen J. Y. C., & McDermott, P. (2006a). The use of virtual media for military applications. Proceedings of the NATO HFM-136 Workshop, West Point, NY.
4. Barnes, M., Parasuraman, R., & Cosenzo, K. (2006b). Adaptive automation for military robotic systems. NATO Technical Report (RTO-TR-HFM-078). Uninhabited Military Vehicles: Human Factors Issues in Augmenting the Force, 420-40.
5. Bodenhammer, A. S. (2007). Assessment of stereoscopic display systems for assisting in route clearance manipulation planning tasks (ARL-TR-4195). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
6. Calhoun, G. L. & Draper, M. H. (2010). Unmanned aerial vehicles: Enhancing video display utility with synthetic vision technology. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
7. Chen, J. Y. C. (2010). Robot operator performance in multitasking environments. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
8. Chen, J. Y. C., Durlach, P. J., Sloan, J. A., & Bowens, L. D. (2008). Human robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology, 20(3), 135-49.
9. Chen, J. Y. C., Haas, E. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37(6), 1231-45.
10. Chen, J. Y. C. & Joyner, C. T. (2006). Effectiveness of gunnery and robotic control performance in a simulated multi-tasking environment. Proceedings of the 25th Army Science Conference. Orlando, FL, 27-30 November.
11. Chen, J. Y. C. & Terrence, P. I. (2008a). Effects of tactile cueing on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multi-tasking environment. Ergonomics, 51(8), 1137-52.
12. Chen, J. Y. C. & Terrence, P. I. (2008b). Effects of imperfect automation on concurrent performance of gunner's and robotics operators's tasks in a simulated mounted environment (ARL Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-4455). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
13. Cosenzo, K. & Stafford, S. (2007). Usability assessment of displays for dismounted soldier applications (ARL-TR-4326). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
14. Cosenzo K., Parasuraman, R., & de Visser, E. (2010). Automation strategies for facilitating human interaction with military unmanned vehicles. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
15. Cosenzo, K., Capstick, E., Pomranky, R. A., Johnson, T., & Dungrani, S. (2009). Soldier machine interface for vehicle formations: Interface design and an approach evaluation and experimentation (ARL-TR-4678). Aberdeen, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
16. Dixon, S. & Wickens, C. D. (2003). Imperfect automation in unmanned aerial vehicle flight control. (AHFD-03-1/MAAD-03-1). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois Research Lab.
17. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., Dawe, L. A., & Anderson, B. W. (2001). Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military Psychology, 13(3), 147-64.
18. Endsley, M. R. & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), Special issue: Telecommunications, pp. 381-94.
19. Evans, A. W., III, Hoeft, R., Rehfeld, S., Feldman, M., Curtis, M., Fincannon et al. (2005). Advancing robotics research through the use of a scale MOUT facility. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomic Society Conference. Orlando, FL.
20. Gilson, R. D., Redden, E. S., & Elliott, L. (2007). Remote tactile displays for future soldiers (TR-ARL-0152). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
21. Goodrich, M. (2010). On maximizing fan-out: towards controlling multiple unmanned vehicles. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
22. Haas, E. C. & van Erp J. (2010). Multimodal research for human-robotic interactions. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
23. Haas, E. C., Stachowiak, C., White, T., Pillalamarri, K., & Feng, T. (2007). The effect of vehicle motion on the integration of audio and tactile displays in robotic system TCU displays. Unpublished manuscript. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
24. Haas, E. C., Stachowiak, C., White, T., Pillalamarri, K., & Feng, T. (2008). Multimodal signals to improve safety and situational awareness in a multitask human-robotic interface. Unpublished manuscript. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
25. Hoeft, R. M., Jentsch, F. G., & Bowers, C. (2005). The effects of interdependence on team performance in human-robot teams. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Conference, Las Vegas, NV.
26. Hunn, B. P. (2006). Video imagery's role in network centric, multiple unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations. In N. J. Cooke, H. Pringle, H. Pedersen, & O. Connor (eds), Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles (pp. 179-91). Oxford: Elsevier.
27. Jentsch, F. G., Evans, A. W., III, Curtis, M., & Fiore, S. (2005). Building lowcost simulation environments to study human-agent interaction. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando, FL.
28. Jenstch, F. G., Evans, A. W., III, Fincannon, T., Keebler, J. R., Curtis, M., Ososky, S., Rehfeld, S., Feldman, M., & Cotton, J. (2007). Believability of the "manbehind-the-curtain": Methodology used in TPL HRI studies for SUS Plus Up Project.
29. Jones, L. A. & Sarter, N. B. (2008). Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Human Factors, 50(1), 90-111.
30. Kelley, C. R. (1968). Manual and Automatic Control. New York: Wiley.
31. Krausman, A. S. & White, T. L. (2008). Detection and localization of vibrotactile signals in moving vehicles (ARL-TR-4463). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
32. Lee, J. D. & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80.
33. Luck, J., McDermott, P. L., Allender, L., & Fisher, A. (2006). Advantages of co-location for effective human to human communication of information provided by an unmanned vehicle. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Conference, San Francisco, October.
34. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors, 43, 563-72.
35. Minkov, Y., Perry, S., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2007). The effect of display size on performance of operational tasks with UAVs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting (pp. 1091-5).
36. Mitchell, D. & Chen, J. Y. C. (2006). Impacting system design with human performance modeling and experiments: Another success story. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
37. Mitchell, D. & Henthorn, T. (2005). Soldier workload analysis of the mounted combat system (MCS) platoon's use of unmanned assets (ARL-TR-3476). Aberdeen Proving Groundx, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
38. Mitchell, D. & Samms, C. (2010). An analytical approach for predicting soldier workload and performance using human performance modeling. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
39. Murphy, R. (2004). Human-robot interactions in rescue robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Applications and Reviews, 34(2), 1-15.
40. National Research Council (2003). Building unmanned group vehicles requires more funding, greater focus. Retrieved from http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=10592.
41. Parasuraman, R., Bahri, T., Deaton, J., & Barnes, M. (1992). Theory and design of adaptive automation in aviation systems (Progress Report NAWCADWAR-92033-60), Warminster, PA: Naval Air Warfare Center.
42. Parasuraman, R., Barnes, M., & Cosenzo, K. (2007). Adaptive automation for human-robot teaming in future command and control systems. The International C2 Journal, 1(2), 43-68.
43. Parasuraman, R, Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1-23.
44. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 286-97.
45. Pettijohn, B., Bodenhamer, A., Schweitzer, K. M., & Comella, D. (2007). Sterovision on the mine protected clearance vehicle (Buffalo) (ARL-TR-4189). Aberdeen Proving Ground MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
46. Redden E. & Elliott, L. (2010). Robotic control systems for dismounted soldiers. In M. J. Barnes & F. J. Jentsch (eds), Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
47. Redden, E., Pettitt, R. A., Carstens, C. B., & Elliott, L. (2008). Scalability of robotic displays: Display size investigations (ARL-TR-4556). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
48. Sarter, N. (2007). Multiple-resource theory as a basis for multimodal interface design: Success stories, qualifications, and research needs. In A. F. Kramer, D. A. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (eds), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 187-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
49. Schipani, S. L. (2003). An evaluation of operator workload during partiallyautonomous vehicle operations. Proceedings of PerMIS 2003. Available: http://www.isd.mel.nist.gov/research_areas/research_engineering/Performance_Metrics/PerMIS_2003/Proceedings/Schipani.pdf.
50. Sellner, B., Heger, F. W., Haitt, L. M., Simmons, R., and Singh, S. (2008). Coordinated multi-agent teams and sliding autonomy for large-scale assembly. Proceedings of the IEEE: Special Issues in Multi-Robot Systems.
51. Shoemaker, C. (2005). Interfaces for ground and aerial military robots: A workshop summary. T. Oron-Gilad (rapporteur), Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, pp. 5-7.
52. Wickens, C. D. & Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53. Wickens, C. D., Dixon, S., & Ambinder, M. S. (2006). Human factors of remotely operated vehicles. In N. J. Cooke, H. L. Pringle, H. K. Pedersen, & O. Connor (eds), Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering. Oxford: Elsevier.
54. Wickens, C. D., Dixon, S., & Chang, D. (2003). Using interference models to predict performance in a multiple task UAV environment-2 UAVs (Technical Report HFD-03-9/MAAD-03-1). Savoy, IL: Institute of Aviation, Aviation Human Factors Division.
55. Woods, D. D., Tittle, J., Feil, M., & Roesler, A. (2004). Envisioning human-robot coordination for future operations. IEEE SMC Part C, 34(2), 210-18.