Communicating Fish Consumption Advisories in California: What Works, What Doesn't

Risk Analysis

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1095-1106

  Tan, May Lynn ^a   Ujihara, Alyce ^b   Kent, Lani ^c   Hendrickson, Ilinisa ^d  

^a Global Pediatric Alliance   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Office of the Controller   (United States)

^d WE CARE Solar   (United States)

Author keywords

Barriers to communication; Fish consumption advisories; Portion size; Risk communication

Indexed keywords

BARRIERS TO COMMUNICATION; CALIFORNIA; CONSUMPTION ADVISORIES; FISH CONSUMPTION; FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORIES; PORTION SIZE; RISK COMMUNICATION; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; SPORT-FISH CONSUMPTION; SPORTFISH; STATE AGENCIES; VISUAL TOOLS;

MERCURY (METAL);

FISH;

MERCURY;

FISH; FOOD CONSUMPTION; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD INTAKE; RISK FACTOR; WATERSHED;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FISH; FOOD CONTAMINATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RISK MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FISHES; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD HABITS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; MALE; MERCURY; MIDDLE AGED; RISK MANAGEMENT;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79959602270     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01559.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. Safe eating guidelines for fish and shellfish from the Central and South Delta, 2010. Available at:, Accessed on November 8, 2010.
2. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. Safe eating guidelines for fish and shellfish from the Sacramento River and Northern Delta (Solano, Sacramento, Yolo, Sutter, Colusa, Yuba, Glenn, Butte, Tehama, and Shasta Counties), 2008. Available at:, Accessed on November 8, 2010.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) for methylmercury, 2001. Available at:, Accessed on November 8, 2010.
4. Silver E, Kaslow J, Lee D, Lee S, Tan ML, Weis E, Ujihara A. Fish consumption and advisory awareness among low-income women in California's Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Environmental Research, 2007; 104:410-419.
5. Tilden J, Hanrahan LP, Anderson H, Palit C, Olson J, Mac Kenzie W, Great Lakes Sport Fish Consortium. Health advisories for consumers of Great Lakes sport fish: Is the message being received? Environmental Health Perspectives, 1997; 105(12):1360-1365.
6. Knuth BA. Fish consumption health advisories: Who heeds the advice? Great Lakes Research Review, 1995; 1(2):36-40.
7. Velicer CM, Knuth BA. Communicating contaminant risks from sport-caught fish: The importance of target audience assessment. Risk Analysis, 1994; 14(5):833-841.
8. Imm P, Knobeloch L, Anderson HA, Great Lakes Sport Fish Consortium. Fish consumption and advisory awareness in the Great Lakes Basin. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2005; 113(10):1325-1329.
9. Kuntz SW, Hill WG, Linkenbach JW, Lande G, Larsson L. Methylmercury risk and awareness among American Indian women of childbearing age living on an inland northwest reservation. Environmental Research, 2009; 109:753-759.
10. Chess C, Burger J, McDermott MH. Speaking like a state: Environmental justice and fish consumption advisories. Society & Natural Resources, 2005; 18:267-278.
11. Burger J, Waishwell L. Are we reaching the target audience? Evaluation of a fish fact sheet. Science of the Total Environment, 2001; 277:77-86.
12. Knuth BA. Risk communication: A new dimension in sport-fisheries management. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1990; 10:374-381.
13. Nesheim MC, Yaktine AL (eds). Seafood Choices, Balancing the Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
14. Klasing S, Brodberg R. Development of Fish Contaminant Goals and Advisory Tissue Levels in California Sport Fish: Chlordane, DDTs, Dieldrin, Methylmercury, PCBs, Selenium, and Toxaphene. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, 2008.
15. Anderson HA, Hanrahan LP, Smith A, Draheim L, Kanarek M, Olsen J. The role of sport-fish consumption advisories in mercury risk communication: A 1998-1999 12-state survey of women age 18-45. Environmental Research, 2004; 95:315-324.
16. Burger J. Gender differences in attitudes about fish safety in a coastal population. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1998 Part A; 53:181-192.
17. MacDonald HF, Boyle KJ. Effect of a statewide sport fish consumption advisory on open-water fishing in Maine. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1997; 17:687-695.
18. Pflugh KK, Lurig L, Von Hagen LA, Von Hagen S, Burger J. Urban anglers' perception of risk from contaminated fish. Science of the Total Environment, 1999; 228:203-218.
19. Burger J, Pflugh KK, Lurig L, Von Hagen LA, Von Hagen S. Fishing in urban New Jersey: Ethnicity affects information sources, perception, and compliance. Risk Analysis 1999; 19(2):217-229.
20. Connelly NA, Knuth BA, Brown TL. Sportifsh consumption patterns of Lake Ontario anglers and the relationship to health advisories. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1996; 16:90-101.
21. Campbell KR, Dickey RJ, Sexton R, Burger J. Fishing along the Clinch River arm of Watts Bar Reservoir adjacent to the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee: Behavior, knowledge and risk perception. Science of the Total Environment, 2002; 299:145-161.
22. May H, Burger J. Fishing in a polluted estuary: Fishing behavior, fish consumption, and potential risk. Risk Analysis 1996; 16(4):459-471.
23. Burger J, Gochfeld M. A framework and information needs for the management of the risks from consumption of self-caught fish. Environmental Research 2006; 101:275-285.
24. Cable TT, Udd E. Effective communication of toxic chemical warnings to anglers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1990; 10:382-387.
25. Beehler GP, McGuinness BM, Vena JE. Polluted fish, sources of knowledge, and perception of risk: Contexualizing African American anglers' sport fishing practices. Human Organization, 2001; 60(3):288-297.
26. Burger J, Staine K. Fishing in contaminated waters: Knowledge and risk perception of hazards by fishermen in New York. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1993; 39:95-105.
27. Dawson J, Sheeshka J, Cole DC, Kraft D, Waugh A. Fishers weigh in: Benefits and risks of eating Great Lakes fish from the consumer's perspective. Agriculture and Human Values, 2008; 25:349-364.
28. Scherer AC, Tsuchiya A, Younglove LR, Burbacher TM, Faustman EM. Comparative analysis of state fish consumption advisories targeting sensitive populations. Environmental Health Perspectives 2008; 116(12):1598-1606.
29. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing, Co. 1967.
30. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration. What you need to know about mercury in fish and shellfish, 2004. EPA-823-R-04-005. Available at:, Accessed on November 8, 2010.
32. Jardine CG. Development of a public participation and communication protocol for establishing fish consumption advisories. Risk Analysis 2003; 23(3):461-471.
33. McDermott MH, Chess C, Perez-Lugo M, Pflugh KK, Bochenek E, Burger J. Communicating a complex message to the population most at risk: An outreach strategy for fish consumption advisories. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 2003; 2:39-48.
34. Derrick CG, Miller JSA, Andrews JM. A fish consumption study of anglers in an at-risk community: A community-based participatory approach to risk reduction. Public Health Nursing, 2008; 25(4):312-318.
35. Connelly NA, Knuth BA. Evaluating risk communication: Examining target audience perceptions about four presentation formats for fish consumption health advisory information. Risk Analysis, 1998; 18(5):649-659.