Fusion algorithm based on improved projected gradient NMF and NSCT

Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1143-1150

  Yang, Yue Tao ^a,b   Zhu, Ming ^a   He, Bai Gen ^a,b   Gao, Wen ^a,b  

^a CHANGCHUN INSTITUTE OF OPTICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Image fusion; Non negatie Matrix Factorization(NMF); Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform(NSCT); Projected gradient

Indexed keywords

BAND PASS; FUSION ALGORITHMS; FUSION METHODS; FUSION RULE; GRADIENT PROJECTIONS; IMAGE FUSION ALGORITHMS; LOW-PASS; MATRIX FACTORIZATIONS; MULTISCALES; NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION ALGORITHMS; NONSUBSAMPLED CONTOURLET TRANSFORMS; OBJECTIVE STANDARD; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; ORIGINAL IMAGES; PROJECTED GRADIENT; SCENE IMAGE; SUB-BANDS; TIME COMPLEXITY;

BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION; FACTORIZATION; IMAGE FUSION;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 79959601155     PISSN: 1004924X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3788/OPE.20111905.1143     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. CUNHA A L, ZHOU J P, DO M N. The nonsubsampled Contourlet transform: theory, design and applications[J]. IEEE Trans on Image Processing, 2006, 15(10): 3089-3101.
2. LEE D D, SEUNG H S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization [J]. Nature, 1999, 401(6755): 788-791.
3. LEE D D, SEUNG H S. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization [C]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, Denver, 2000: 556-562.
4. MIAO Q G, WANG B SH. Multi-focus image fusion based on Non-Negative Matrix Factorization [J].Acta Optica Sinica, 2005, 25(6): 755-759.(in Chinese)
5. NOVAK M, MAMMONE R. Use of non-negative matrix factorization for language model adaptation in a lecture transcription task [C]. Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, SaltLake, 2001: 541-544.
6. GUILLAMET D, BRESSAN M, VITRIA J. A weighted non-negative matrix factorization for local representations [C]. Proc IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition V1, Kauai, HI, 2001: 942-947.
7. FENG T, LI S Z, SHUM H Y, et al.. Local non-negative matrix factorization as a visual representation[C]. Proc. 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning, Cambridge, 2002: 1-6.
8. DO M N, VETTERLI M. The Contourlet Transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation [J]. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing , 2005, 14(12): 2091-2106.
9. BAMBERGER R H, SMITH M T. A filter bank for the directional decomposition of images: theory and design [J].IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 1992, 40(4): 882-893.
10. LEE D D, SEUNG H S. Algorithms for Non-negative Matrix Factorization [J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing, MIT Press, 2001, 13: 556-562.
11. LI L, ZHANG Y J. A survey on algorithms of Non-Negative Matrix Factorization[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2008, 36(4): 737-743.(in Chinese)
12. LIN C J. Projected gradient methods for non-negative matrix factorization [J].Neural Computation, 2007, 19(10): 2756-2779.
13. LANGGREBE D A. Multispectral Data Analysis: A Signal Theory Perspective[EB/OL]. http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~biehl/MultiSpec/documentation.html
14. HU L M, GAO J, HE K F. Research on Quality Measures for Image Fusion[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2004, 32(12A): 218-221.(in Chinese)
15. QU X B, YAN J W, YANG G D. Multifocus image fusion method of sharp frequency localized Contourlet transform domain based on sum-modified-Laplacian[J]. Opt. Precision Eng., 2009, 17(5): 1203-1211.(in Chinese)