The advanced adenoma: A topical concept but an out-of-date definition?;L'adénome avancé: Un concept d'actualité, mais une définition périmée?

Hepato-Gastro

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 269-276

  Denis, Bernard ^a   Bottlaender, Jacques ^a   Breysacher, Gilles ^a   Chiappa, Pascale ^a   Peter, André ^a   Weiss, Anne Marie ^a  

^a Pasteur Hospital   (France)

Author keywords

Adenoma; Adenomatous polyp; Advanced adenoma; Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADVANCED ADENOMA; CANCER PREVENTION; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; SHORT SURVEY; TUMOR VOLUME; VILLOUS ADENOMA; ADVANCED CANCER; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

EID: 79959588942     PISSN: 12537020     EISSN: 19524048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1684/hpg.2011.0584     Document Type: Short Survey

References (25)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002 ; 12 : 1-9. (Pubitemid 34072776)
2. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987 ; 93 : 1009-13. (Pubitemid 18000643)
3. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C, et al. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies. Gut 2007 ; 56 : 1585-9. (Pubitemid 350033198)
4. Appelman HD. Should HGD or degree of villous changes in colon polyps be reported? CON: high-grade dysplasia and villous features should not be part of the routine diagnosis of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroentrol 2008 ; 103 : 1329-31. (Pubitemid 351813944)
5. Odze RD. Should HGD or degree of villous changes in colon polyps be reported? A balancing view: pathologist-clinician interaction is essential. Am J Gastroenterol 2008 ; 103 : 1331-3.
6. Denis B, Peters C, Chapelain C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of community pathologists in the interpretation of colorectal polyps. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 ; 21 : 1153-60.
7. Rex DK, Alikhan M, Cummings O, et al. Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 ; 50 : 468-74. (Pubitemid 29480771)
8. Heitman SJ, Ronksley PE, Hilsden RJ, et al. Prevalence of adenomas and colorectal cancer in average risk individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 ; 7 : 1272-8.
9. Cottet V, Jooste V, Bouvier AM, et al. Time trends in first-diagnosis rates of colorectal adenomas: a 24-year population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008 ; 27 : 950-9. (Pubitemid 351537656)
10. Denis B, Weiss AM, Peter A, et al. Quality assurance and gastrointestinal endoscopy: an audit of 500 colonoscopic procedures. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2004 ; 28 : 1245-55. (Pubitemid 40070050)
11. Denis B, Ruetsch M, Strentz P, et al. Short-term outcomes of the first round of a pilot colorectal cancer screening programme with guaiac based faecal occult blood test. Gut 2007 ; 56 : 1579-84. (Pubitemid 350033197)
12. Terry MB, Neugut AI, Bostick RM, et al. Risk factors for advanced colorectal adenomas: a pooled analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002 ; 11 : 622-9. (Pubitemid 34760820)
13. Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2010 ; 138 : 2029-43.
14. De Bosset V, Froehlich F, Thorens J, et al. Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy? Endoscopy 2002 ; 34 : 360-8.
15. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on qualituy and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 ; 61 : 378-84. (Pubitemid 40349029)
16. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 ; 51 : 33-6. (Pubitemid 30051607)
17. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006 ; 355 : 2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
18. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 ; 102 : 856-61. (Pubitemid 46496608)
19. Denis B, Sauleau E.A, Gendre I, et al. Measurement of adenoma detection and discrimination during colonoscopy in routine practice: an exploratory study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011 (sous presse).
20. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004 ; 127 : 41-8. (Pubitemid 38962272)
21. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multisociety task force on colorectal cancer and the american cancer society. CA Cancer J Clin 2006 ; 56 : 143-59. (Pubitemid 43847925)
22. Atkin WS, Saunders BP. Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut 2002 ; 51(suppl V):v6-9.
23. Saini SD, Kim HM, Schoenfeld P. Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 ; 64 : 614-26. (Pubitemid 44419414)
24. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Liebermann DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009 ; 136 : 832-41.
25. Bretagne JF, Ponchon T. Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy 2008 ; 40 : 523-8.