Concurrent analysis of choice and control in childbirth

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Snowden, Austyn ^a   Martin, Colin ^a   Jomeen, Julie ^b   Martin, Caroline H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^c GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Choice control; Concurrent analysis; Generalisable; Narrative; Pregnancy; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BIRTH CONTROL; CHILDBIRTH; CONCURRENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BIRTH; CONTROL; FEMALE; INTERVIEW; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FETAL MEMBRANES, PREMATURE RUPTURE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NARRATION; PARTURITION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79959564413     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-40     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Martin CR, Jomeen J. The impact of clinical management type on maternal locus of control in pregnant women with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Health Psychology Update 2004, 133-13.
2. Department Of Health National Service Framework for Children, Young People and Maternity Services: Maternity Services. 2004, Department Of Health.
3. Department Of Health Maternity Matters: choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service. 2007, London, Department of Health. London, Department Of Health.
4. Allingham M. Choice Theory: A Very Short Introduction. 2002, New York: Oxford University Press, 1.
5. Edwards NP. Why can't women just say no? And does it really matter?. Informed Choice in Maternity Care 2004, 1-29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, M K.
6. Edwards NP, Murphy-Lawless J. The instability of risk: womens' perspectives on risk and safety in birth. Risk and Choice in Maternity Care: An international perspective 2006, 34-49. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, Symon A.
7. Barber T, Rogers J, Marsh S. Increasing out of hospital birth: what needs to change?. British Journal of Midwifery 2007, 15(1):16-20.
8. Morison S, Hauck Y, Percival P, Mcmurray A. Constructing home birth through assuming control. Midwifery 1998, 14233-241.
9. Green JM, Coupland BA, Kitzinger J. Expectations, experiences and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990, 1715-24.
10. Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy D, Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal healthy pregnancy?. Midwifery 2008, 26394-400.
11. Cunningham JD. Experiences of Australian mothers who gave birth either at home, at a birth centre, or in hospital labour wards. Social Science and Medicine 1993, 36(4):475-483. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90409-W, 8434272.
12. Eakins P. The American Way of Birth. 1996, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13. Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL. Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis [Internet]. The Lancet 2005, 366(9488):825-831., http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673605670304
14. Pawson R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. 2006, London: Sage.
15. Chang Y-T, Hayter M, Wu S-C. A systematic review and meta-ethnography of the qualitative literature: experiences of the menarche [Internet]. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2010, 19(3-4):447-460. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03019.x, 20500285., http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03019.x
16. Snowden A, Martin CR. Concurrent analysis: towards generalisable qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2010,
17. Snowden A, Martin CR. Mental health nurse prescribing: a difficult pill to swallow? [Internet]. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing 2010, 17(6):543-53. 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01561.x, 20633082., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633082
18. Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF. Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations. Annals Of Family Medicine 2008, 6(4):331-340. 10.1370/afm.818, 2478498, 18626033.
19. Jomeen J, Martin CR. The impact of clinical management type on maternal and neo-natal outcome following pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 2002, 63-9.
20. Munro S, Kornelsen J, Hutton E. Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: The influence of birth stories [Internet]. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2009, 54(5):373-379., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2009-13159-003&site=ehost-live
21. Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, Hill S, Jolivet R, Willetts J, et al. "I wasn't alone"--a study of group prenatal care in the military [Internet]. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 2009, 54(3):176-183., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010299764&site=ehost-live
22. McCourt C, Pearce A. Does continuity of carer matter to women from minority ethnic groups? [Internet]. Midwifery 2000, 16(2):145-54. 10.1054/midw.2000.0204, 11151550., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11151550
23. Houvouras S. Negotiated Boundaries: Conceptual Locations of Pregnancy and Childbirth [Internet]. Qualitative Report 2006, 11(4):665-686., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=24351112&site=ehost-live
24. Parry DC. Women's Lived Experiences With Pregnancy and Midwifery in a Medicalized and Fetocentric Context [Internet]. Qualitative Inquiry 2006, 12(3):459-471., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=22518531&site=ehost-live
25. Crossley ML. Childbirth, complications and the illusion of "choice": a case study [Internet]. Feminism & Psychology 2007, 17(4):543-563. 10.1177/0959353507083103, 21553641., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2009751968&site=ehost-live
26. Shaw RI. "It"s your body, your baby, your birth': planning and achieving home birth [Internet]. Feminism & Psychology 2007, 17(4):565-570. 10.1177/0959353507083092, 21553641., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2009751971&site=ehost-live
27. Stockill C. Trust the Experts? A Commentary on Choice and Control in Childbirth [Internet]. Feminism & Psychology 2007, 17(4):571-577. 10.1177/0959353507083093, 21553641., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=27985284&site=ehost-live
28. Namey EE, Lyerly AD. The meaning of "control" for childbearing women in the US. Social Science and Medicine 2010, 71(4):769-776. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.024, 20579792.
29. Hall SM, Holloway IM. Staying in control: women's experiences of labour in water. Midwifery 1998, 14:1430-6. 30-36. Midwifery.
30. Walker JM, Hall S, Thomas M. The experience of labour: a perspective from those receiving care in a midwife led unit. Midwifery 2005, 11120-129.
31. Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: Home birth as a self-constructed choice in Finland [Internet]. Social Science & Medicine 2001, 52(7):1109-1121. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00206-9, 21637935., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2001-00381-005&site=ehost-live
32. Viisainen K. The moral dangers of home birth: parents' perceptions of risks in home birth in Finland [Internet]. Sociology of Health & Illness 2000, 22(6):792-814. 10.1111/1467-9566.00231, 21638085., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hch&AN=4387166&site=ehost-live
33. Morison S, Percival P, Hauck Y, Mcmurray A. Birthing at home: the resolution of expectations. Midwifery 1999, 1532-39.
34. Kontoyannis M, Katsetos C. What influences women in Athens to choose home birth? [Internet]. British Journal of Midwifery 2008, 16(1):44-48., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2009801852&site=ehost-live
35. Kennedy HP, Shannon MT. Keeping birth normal: research findings on midwifery care during childbirth [Internet]. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 2004, 33(5):554-560. 10.1177/0884217504268971, 21477222., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2004172657&site=ehost-live
36. Lynn C, Inaam K, Sonia S, Robin K, Katri V-J. The pain of childbirth: perceptions of culturally diverse women [Internet]. Pain management nursing: official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses 2003, 4(4):145-154., http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1524904203000286?showall=true
37. Lundgren I, Dahlberg K. Women's experience of pain during childbirth [Internet]. Midwifery 1998, 14(2):105-110. 10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90007-9, 10382479., http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WN9-4D6XP74-6G/2/91d6bd894d206ddf9ee22e08aa6403a2
38. Halldorsdottir S, Karlsdottir SI. Journeying through labour and delivery: perceptions of women who have given birth. Midwifery 1996, 1248-61.
39. Maher J. Progressing through labour and delivery: Birth time and women's experiences. Women's Studies International Forum 2008, 31129-137.
40. McCallum C, Reis A. Childbirth as ritual in Brazil: young mothers' experiences [Internet]. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 2005, 70(3):335-360., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=18288758&site=ehost-live
41. Liamputtong P. Giving birth in the hospital: childbirth experiences of Thai women in Northern Thailand [Internet]. Health Care for Women International 2004, 25(5):454-480. 10.1080/07399330490267468, 15204813., http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2004201879&site=ehost-live
42. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 1998, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2.
43. Charmaz K. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second generation. 2009, 127-149. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Morse J, Noerager Stern P, Corbin J, Bowers B, Charmaz K, Clarke E.
44. McGhee G, Marland GR, Atkinson J. Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity. [Internet]. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2007, 60(3):334-42. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x, 17908129., http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17908129
45. Woolett A, Dosanjh-Matwala N. Postnatal care: the attitudes and experiences of Asian women in east London. Midwifery 1990, 6(4):178-184. 10.1016/S0266-6138(05)80112-3, 2079917.
46. Oakley A. Women confined: Towards a sociology of childbirth. 1980, Oxford: Martin Robinson.
47. Weaver CJ. Women's Health: Contemporary International Perspectives. 2000, Leicester: British Psychological Society, Leicester, Usher JM.
48. McCourt C, Pearce A. Does continuity of carer matter to women from ethnic minority groups?. Midwifery 2000, 16145-154.
49. Jomeen J. Choice and Control in Contemporary Childbirth: Understanding through Women's Experiences. 2010, Oxford: Radcliffe.
50. Moore LE, Rayburn W. Elective induction of labour. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2006, 49(3):698-704. 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00026, 21633299.
51. Gamble J, Creedy DK. Women's request for a caesarean section: A critique of the literature. Birth 2000, 27:256-63. 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x, 11251511.
52. Mander R. Caesarean: Just another way of birth. 2007, Abingdon: Routledge.
53. Green J, Baston H. Feeling in Control during Labour: Concepts, Correlates and Consequences. Birth 2003, 30(4):235-247. 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00253.x, 14992154.
54. Snowden A. Medication management in older adults: a critique of concordance. British Journal of Nursing 2008, 17(2):114-120.
55. Glaser B. Theoretical Sensitivity. 1978, Mill Valley, CA The Sociology Press.
56. Daly J, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, et al. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research [Internet]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2007, 60(1):43-49. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.014, 17161753., http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T84-4M0J4HD-1/2/7d84e98dc8fc507b19c473804852ebb8