An imaging flow cytometric method for measuring cell division history and molecular symmetry during mitosis

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 79 A, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 496-506

  Filby, Andrew ^a   Perucha, Esperanza ^b,c   Summers, Huw ^d   Rees, Paul ^d   Chana, Prabhjoat ^c   Heck, Susanne ^c   Lord, Graham M ^b,c   Davies, Derek ^a  

^a IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asymmetric cell division; Cell cycle analysis; Flow cytometry; Image analysis; Imaging flow cytometry

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEIN KINASE C ZETA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CYTOLOGY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; INSTRUMENTATION; LEUKEMIA CELL LINE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MITOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL DIVISION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; IMAGE CYTOMETRY; JURKAT CELLS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MITOSIS; PROTEIN KINASE C;

EID: 79959557893     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.21091     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Cairns J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 1975; 255: 197-200.
2. Kusch J, Liakopoulos D, Barral Y. Spindle asymmetry: A compass for the cell. Trends Cell Biol 2003; 13: 562-569.
3. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8: 677-687.
4. Shen Q, Zhong W, Jan YN, Temple S. Asymmetric Numb distribution is critical for asymmetric cell division of mouse cerebral cortical stem cells and neuroblasts. Development 2002; 129: 4843-4853.
5. Lambert JD, Nagy LM. Asymmetric inheritance of centrosomally localized mRNAs during embryonic cleavages. Nature 2002; 420: 682-686.
6. Freeman MR, Doe CQ. Asymmetric Prospero localization is required to generate mixed neuronal/glial lineages in the Drosophila CNS. Development 2001; 128: 4103-4112.
7. Smith GH. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 2005; 132: 681-687.
8. Conboy MJ, Karasov AO, Rando TA. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol 2007; 5: e102.
9. Karpowicz P, Morshead C, Kam A, Jervis E, Ramunas J, Cheng V, van der Kooy D. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis. J Cell Biol 2005; 170: 721-732.
10. Karpowicz P, Morshead C, Kam A, Jervis E, Ramunas J, Cheng V, van der Kooy D. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: Neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J Cell Biol 2005; 170: 721-732.
11. Aguado R, Martin-Blanco N, Caraballo M, Canelles M. The endocytic adaptor Numb regulates thymus size by modulating pre-TCR signaling during asymmetric division. Blood 2010; 116: 1705-1714.
12. Chang JT, Palanivel VR, Kinjyo I, Schambach F, Intlekofer AM, Banerjee A, Longworth SA, Vinup KE, Mrass P, Oliaro J, et al. Asymmetric T lymphocyte division in the initiation of adaptive immune responses. Science 2007; 315: 1687-1691.
13. Oliaro J, Van Ham V, Sacirbegovic F, Pasam A, Bomzon ZÄ, Pham K, Ludford-Menting MJ, Waterhouse NJ, Bots M, Hawkins ED, et al. Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. J Immunol 2010; 185: 367-375.
14. Pine SR, Ryan BdM, Varticovski L, Robles AI, Harris CC. Microenvironmental modulation of asymmetric cell division in human lung cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 2195-2200.
15. Tabuse Y, Izumi Y, Piano F, Kemphues KJ, Miwa J, Ohno S. Atypical protein kinase C cooperates with PAR-3 to establish embryonic polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 1998; 125: 3607-3614.
16. Ludford-Menting MJ, Oliaro J, Sacirbegovic F, Cheah ET, Pedersen N, Thomas SJ, Pasam A, Iazzolino R, Dow LE, Waterhouse NJ, et al. A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity 2005; 22: 737-748.
17. Gerard A, Mertens AE, van der Kammen RA, Collard JG. The Par polarity complex regulates Rap1- and chemokine-induced T cell polarization. J Cell Biol 2007; 176: 863-875.
18. Lin J, Hou KK, Piwnica-Worms H, Shaw AS. The polarity protein Par1b/EMK/MARK2 regulates T cell receptor-induced microtubule-organizing center polarization. J Immunol 2009; 183: 1215-1221.
19. Rajendran L, Masilamani M, Solomon S, Tikkanen R, Stuermer CA, Plattner H, Illges H. Asymmetric localization of flotillins/reggies in preassembled platforms confers inherent polarity to hematopoietic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 8241-8246.
20. Ortyn WE, Hall BE, George TC, Frost K, Basiji DA, Perry DJ, Zimmerman CA, Coder D, Morrissey PJ. Sensitivity measurement and compensation in spectral imaging. Cytometry Part A: J Int Soc Anal Cytol 2006; 69: 852-862.
21. Filby A, Seddon B, Kleczkowska J, Salmond R, Tomlinson P, Smida M, Lindquist JA, Schraven B, Zamoyska R. Fyn regulates the duration of TCR engagement needed for commitment to effector function. J Immunol 2007; 179: 4635-4644.
22. Eidukevicius R, Characiejus D, Janavicius R, Kazlauskaite N, Pasukoniene V, Mauricas M, Den Otter W. A method to estimate cell cycle time and growth fraction using bromodeoxyuridine-flow cytometry data from a single sample. BMC Cancer 2005; 5: 122.
23. Ormerod MG, Kubbies M. Cell cycle analysis of asynchronous cell populations by flow cytometry using bromodeoxyuridine label and Hoechst-propidium iodide stain. Cytometry 1992; 13: 678-685.
24. Nordon RE, Nakamura M, Ramirez C, Odell R. Analysis of growth kinetics by division tracking. Immunol Cell Biol 1999; 77: 523-529.
25. Lyons AB, Parish CR. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 1994; 171: 131-137.
26. Luther E, Kamentsky LA. Resolution of mitotic cells using laser scanning cytometry. Cytometry 1996; 23: 272-278.
27. Hans F, Dimitrov S. Histone H3 phosphorylation and cell division. Oncogene 2001; 20: 3021-3027.
28. Sentein P. Nocodazole, an antitubulin substance, whose action is different from that of colchicine. Effects on segmentation mitoses. I. Light microscopy. Arch Biol (Liege) 1979; 90: 459-479.
29. Ortyn WE, Perry DJ, Venkatachalam V, Liang L, Hall BE, Frost K, Basiji DA. Extended depth of field imaging for high speed cell analysis. Cytometry Part A: J Int Soc Anal Cytol 2007; 71: 215-231.
30. Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman H, Traganos F, Steinkamp J. Cell heterogeneity during the cell cycle. J Cell Physiol 1982; 113: 465-474.
31. Treves S, Di Virgilio F, Vaselli GM, Pozzan T. Effect of cytochalasins on cytosolic-free calcium concentration and phosphoinositide metabolism in leukocytes. Exp Cell Res 1987; 168: 285-298.
32. Donnenberg AD, Donnenberg VS. Rare-event analysis in flow cytometry. Clin Lab Med 2007; 27: 627-652, viii.
33. Roederer M. How many events is enough? Are you positive? Cytometry Part A: J Int Soc Anal Cytol 2008; 73: 384-385.
34. Gerlach C, van Heijst JW, Swart E, Sie D, Armstrong N, Kerkhoven RM, Zehn D, Bevan MJ, Schepers K, Schumacher TN. One naive T cell, multiple fates in CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Exp Med 2010; 207: 1235-1246.
35. Bergeland T, Widerberg J, Bakke O, Nordeng TW. Mitotic partitioning of endosomes and lysosomes. Curr Biol 2001; 11: 644-651.
36. Summers HD, Rees P, Holton MD, Rowan Brown M, Chappell SC, Smith PJ, Errington RJ. Statistical analysis of nanoparticle dosing in a dynamic cellular system. Nat Nanotechnol 2011; 6: 170-174.
37. Kiel MJ, He S, Ashkenazi R, Gentry SN, Teta M, Kushner JA, Jackson TL, Morrison SJ. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU. Nature 2007; 449: 238-242.