-
1
-
-
79959540635
-
-
AstraZeneca Receives Action Letter From FDA for Exanta (ximelagatran). [9 August 2010].
-
AstraZeneca Receives Action Letter From FDA for Exanta (ximelagatran). [9 August 2010].
-
-
-
-
2
-
-
79959556164
-
-
Merck Announces Voluntary Worldwide Withdrawal of VIOXX®. [9 August 2010].
-
Merck Announces Voluntary Worldwide Withdrawal of VIOXX®. [9 August 2010].
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
65449173187
-
ESAs further restricted, but debate continues
-
Brower V. ESAs further restricted, but debate continues. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 1344-51.
-
(2008)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.100
, pp. 1344-1351
-
-
Brower, V.1
-
5
-
-
0003696864
-
-
Working CIOMS Group IV. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: Geneva
-
Working CIOMS Group IV. Benefit-Risk Balance for Marketed Drugs: Evaluating Safety Signals. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: Geneva, 1998.
-
(1998)
Benefit-Risk Balance for Marketed Drugs: Evaluating Safety Signals
-
-
-
6
-
-
79959542118
-
-
EBE Report: Balancing Benefits and Risks: Sharing Responsibility. [12 August 2010].
-
EBE Report: Balancing Benefits and Risks: Sharing Responsibility. [12 August 2010].
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
77954882236
-
Regulatory challenges, reimbursement, and risk-benefit assessment
-
Breckenridge A. Regulatory challenges, reimbursement, and risk-benefit assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010; 88: 153-4.
-
(2010)
Clin Pharmacol Ther
, vol.88
, pp. 153-154
-
-
Breckenridge, A.1
-
8
-
-
78951480226
-
Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters
-
Walker S, Liberti L, McAuslane N. Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 179-82.
-
(2011)
Clin Pharmacol Ther
, vol.89
, pp. 179-182
-
-
Walker, S.1
Liberti, L.2
McAuslane, N.3
-
9
-
-
79959559723
-
-
European Medicines Agency Benefit-Risk Methodology Project, EMA/213482/2010 (2010). [16 February 2011].
-
European Medicines Agency Benefit-Risk Methodology Project, EMA/213482/2010 (2010). [16 February 2011].
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
78951480208
-
Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines
-
Coplan PM, Noel RA, Levitan BS, Ferguson J, Mussen F. Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 312-5.
-
(2011)
Clin Pharmacol Ther
, vol.89
, pp. 312-315
-
-
Coplan, P.M.1
Noel, R.A.2
Levitan, B.S.3
Ferguson, J.4
Mussen, F.5
-
11
-
-
78951477988
-
Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights
-
Levitan BS, Andrews EB, Gilsenan A, et al. Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 217-24.
-
(2011)
Clin Pharmacol Ther
, vol.89
, pp. 217-224
-
-
Levitan, B.S.1
Andrews, E.B.2
Gilsenan, A.3
-
12
-
-
0023887476
-
An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment
-
Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1728-33.
-
(1988)
N Engl J Med
, vol.318
, pp. 1728-1733
-
-
Laupacis, A.1
Sackett, D.L.2
Roberts, R.S.3
-
13
-
-
0028908929
-
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect
-
Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995; 310: 452-4.
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.310
, pp. 452-454
-
-
Cook, R.J.1
Sackett, D.L.2
-
14
-
-
66149158178
-
Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up
-
Roukoz H, Bavry AA, Sarkees ML, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up. Am J Med 2009; 122: 581.e1-581.e10.
-
(2009)
Am J Med
, vol.122
-
-
Roukoz, H.1
Bavry, A.A.2
Sarkees, M.L.3
-
15
-
-
0033583746
-
Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and the Cochrane Applicability Methods Working Group
-
Guyatt GH, Sinclair J, Cook DJ, Glasziou P. Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and the Cochrane Applicability Methods Working Group. JAMA 1999; 281: 1836-43.
-
(1999)
JAMA
, vol.281
, pp. 1836-1843
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Sinclair, J.2
Cook, D.J.3
Glasziou, P.4
-
16
-
-
0347600596
-
Benefit-risk analysis: examples using quantitative methods
-
Holden WL, Juhaeri J, Dai W. Benefit-risk analysis: examples using quantitative methods. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003; 12: 693-7.
-
(2003)
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
, vol.12
, pp. 693-697
-
-
Holden, W.L.1
Juhaeri, J.2
Dai, W.3
-
17
-
-
69949163560
-
Weighing benefits and risks--the FDA's review of prasugrel
-
Unger EF. Weighing benefits and risks--the FDA's review of prasugrel. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 942-5.
-
(2009)
N Engl J Med
, vol.361
, pp. 942-945
-
-
Unger, E.F.1
-
18
-
-
44649133246
-
A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more?
-
O'Neill RT. A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more? Drug Inf J 2008; 42: 235-245.
-
(2008)
Drug Inf J
, vol.42
, pp. 235-245
-
-
O'Neill, R.T.1
-
19
-
-
77955391449
-
A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group
-
Guo JJ, Pandey S, Doyle J, Bian B, Lis Y, Raisch DW. A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. Value Health 2010; 13: 657-66.
-
(2010)
Value Health
, vol.13
, pp. 657-666
-
-
Guo, J.J.1
Pandey, S.2
Doyle, J.3
Bian, B.4
Lis, Y.5
Raisch, D.W.6
-
20
-
-
79959570239
-
-
Benefit-risk Methodology Project: Work Package 2 Report: Applicability of Current Tools and Processes for Regulatory Benefit-risk Assessment. [16 February 2011].
-
Benefit-risk Methodology Project: Work Package 2 Report: Applicability of Current Tools and Processes for Regulatory Benefit-risk Assessment. [16 February 2011].
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
79959560338
-
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry. [17 February 2011].
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry. [17 February 2011].
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
79959535797
-
-
A brief introduction to the use of stated-choice methods to measure preferences for treatment benefits and risks. RTI Press Publication No. RR-0009-0909. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2009.
-
Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Poulos CM. A brief introduction to the use of stated-choice methods to measure preferences for treatment benefits and risks. RTI Press Publication No. RR-0009-0909. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2009.
-
-
-
Johnson, F.R.1
Hauber, A.B.2
Poulos, C.M.3
-
23
-
-
79959553469
-
-
Reflection Paper on Benefit-Risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use. EMEA 2008.
-
Reflection Paper on Benefit-Risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use. EMEA 2008.
-
-
-
|