메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 653-656

Benefit-risk assessment: To quantify or not to quantify, that is the question

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 79959542542     PISSN: 10538569     EISSN: 10991557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pds.2149     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (8)

References (23)
  • 1
    • 79959540635 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • AstraZeneca Receives Action Letter From FDA for Exanta (ximelagatran). [9 August 2010].
    • AstraZeneca Receives Action Letter From FDA for Exanta (ximelagatran). [9 August 2010].
  • 2
    • 79959556164 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Merck Announces Voluntary Worldwide Withdrawal of VIOXX®. [9 August 2010].
    • Merck Announces Voluntary Worldwide Withdrawal of VIOXX®. [9 August 2010].
  • 3
    • 65449173187 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ESAs further restricted, but debate continues
    • Brower V. ESAs further restricted, but debate continues. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100: 1344-51.
    • (2008) J Natl Cancer Inst , vol.100 , pp. 1344-1351
    • Brower, V.1
  • 5
    • 0003696864 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Working CIOMS Group IV. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: Geneva
    • Working CIOMS Group IV. Benefit-Risk Balance for Marketed Drugs: Evaluating Safety Signals. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: Geneva, 1998.
    • (1998) Benefit-Risk Balance for Marketed Drugs: Evaluating Safety Signals
  • 6
    • 79959542118 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • EBE Report: Balancing Benefits and Risks: Sharing Responsibility. [12 August 2010].
    • EBE Report: Balancing Benefits and Risks: Sharing Responsibility. [12 August 2010].
  • 7
    • 77954882236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regulatory challenges, reimbursement, and risk-benefit assessment
    • Breckenridge A. Regulatory challenges, reimbursement, and risk-benefit assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010; 88: 153-4.
    • (2010) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.88 , pp. 153-154
    • Breckenridge, A.1
  • 8
    • 78951480226 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters
    • Walker S, Liberti L, McAuslane N. Refining the benefit-risk framework for the assessment of medicines: valuing and weighting benefit and risk parameters. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 179-82.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.89 , pp. 179-182
    • Walker, S.1    Liberti, L.2    McAuslane, N.3
  • 9
    • 79959559723 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • European Medicines Agency Benefit-Risk Methodology Project, EMA/213482/2010 (2010). [16 February 2011].
    • European Medicines Agency Benefit-Risk Methodology Project, EMA/213482/2010 (2010). [16 February 2011].
  • 10
    • 78951480208 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines
    • Coplan PM, Noel RA, Levitan BS, Ferguson J, Mussen F. Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 312-5.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.89 , pp. 312-315
    • Coplan, P.M.1    Noel, R.A.2    Levitan, B.S.3    Ferguson, J.4    Mussen, F.5
  • 11
    • 78951477988 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights
    • Levitan BS, Andrews EB, Gilsenan A, et al. Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011; 89: 217-24.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.89 , pp. 217-224
    • Levitan, B.S.1    Andrews, E.B.2    Gilsenan, A.3
  • 12
    • 0023887476 scopus 로고
    • An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment
    • Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1728-33.
    • (1988) N Engl J Med , vol.318 , pp. 1728-1733
    • Laupacis, A.1    Sackett, D.L.2    Roberts, R.S.3
  • 13
    • 0028908929 scopus 로고
    • The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect
    • Cook RJ, Sackett DL. The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect. BMJ 1995; 310: 452-4.
    • (1995) BMJ , vol.310 , pp. 452-454
    • Cook, R.J.1    Sackett, D.L.2
  • 14
    • 66149158178 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up
    • Roukoz H, Bavry AA, Sarkees ML, et al. Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up. Am J Med 2009; 122: 581.e1-581.e10.
    • (2009) Am J Med , vol.122
    • Roukoz, H.1    Bavry, A.A.2    Sarkees, M.L.3
  • 15
    • 0033583746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and the Cochrane Applicability Methods Working Group
    • Guyatt GH, Sinclair J, Cook DJ, Glasziou P. Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group and the Cochrane Applicability Methods Working Group. JAMA 1999; 281: 1836-43.
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.281 , pp. 1836-1843
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Sinclair, J.2    Cook, D.J.3    Glasziou, P.4
  • 16
    • 0347600596 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefit-risk analysis: examples using quantitative methods
    • Holden WL, Juhaeri J, Dai W. Benefit-risk analysis: examples using quantitative methods. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003; 12: 693-7.
    • (2003) Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf , vol.12 , pp. 693-697
    • Holden, W.L.1    Juhaeri, J.2    Dai, W.3
  • 17
    • 69949163560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Weighing benefits and risks--the FDA's review of prasugrel
    • Unger EF. Weighing benefits and risks--the FDA's review of prasugrel. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 942-5.
    • (2009) N Engl J Med , vol.361 , pp. 942-945
    • Unger, E.F.1
  • 18
    • 44649133246 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more?
    • O'Neill RT. A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more? Drug Inf J 2008; 42: 235-245.
    • (2008) Drug Inf J , vol.42 , pp. 235-245
    • O'Neill, R.T.1
  • 19
    • 77955391449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group
    • Guo JJ, Pandey S, Doyle J, Bian B, Lis Y, Raisch DW. A review of quantitative risk-benefit methodologies for assessing drug safety and efficacy-report of the ISPOR risk-benefit management working group. Value Health 2010; 13: 657-66.
    • (2010) Value Health , vol.13 , pp. 657-666
    • Guo, J.J.1    Pandey, S.2    Doyle, J.3    Bian, B.4    Lis, Y.5    Raisch, D.W.6
  • 20
    • 79959570239 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefit-risk Methodology Project: Work Package 2 Report: Applicability of Current Tools and Processes for Regulatory Benefit-risk Assessment. [16 February 2011].
    • Benefit-risk Methodology Project: Work Package 2 Report: Applicability of Current Tools and Processes for Regulatory Benefit-risk Assessment. [16 February 2011].
  • 21
    • 79959560338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry. [17 February 2011].
    • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry. [17 February 2011].
  • 22
    • 79959535797 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A brief introduction to the use of stated-choice methods to measure preferences for treatment benefits and risks. RTI Press Publication No. RR-0009-0909. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2009.
    • Johnson FR, Hauber AB, Poulos CM. A brief introduction to the use of stated-choice methods to measure preferences for treatment benefits and risks. RTI Press Publication No. RR-0009-0909. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2009.
    • Johnson, F.R.1    Hauber, A.B.2    Poulos, C.M.3
  • 23
    • 79959553469 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reflection Paper on Benefit-Risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use. EMEA 2008.
    • Reflection Paper on Benefit-Risk Assessment Methods in the Context of the Evaluation of Marketing Authorisation Applications of Medicinal Products for Human Use. EMEA 2008.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.