Comparison between knife-edge and frisbee-shaped surrogate surfaces for making dry deposition measurements: Wind tunnel experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 45, Issue 25, 2011, Pages 4213-4219

  Huang, Jiaoyan ^a   Liu, Ying ^b   Holsen, Thomas M ^a,b  

^a Clarkson University   (United States)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Frisbee shaped; Gas dry deposition; Knife edge; Surrogated surface; Wind tunnel

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC CONTAMINANTS; CFD SIMULATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS MODELING; CONSTANT THICKNESS; DEPOSITION VELOCITIES; DIRECT METHOD; DRY DEPOSITION; EARTH SURFACE; EASE OF USE; FLUID FIELD; FRISBEE-SHAPED; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; GOLD-COATED; INCIDENT ANGLES; KNIFE-EDGE; LEADING EDGE; NATURAL SURFACE; SURROGATE SURFACES; SURROGATED SURFACE; TWO PLATES; VELOCITY GRADIENTS; WIND FLOW; WIND SPEED; WIND TUNNEL EXPERIMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DEPOSITION; EARTH ATMOSPHERE; EXPERIMENTS; FLUIDS; GOLD DEPOSITS; LAMINAR BOUNDARY LAYER; MERCURY (METAL); PARALLEL FLOW; TWO DIMENSIONAL; WIND TUNNELS;

GOLD COATINGS;

GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; GASEOUS OXIDIZED MERCURY; MERCURY; PARTICULATE BOUNCED MERCURY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; BOUNDARY LAYER; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRY DEPOSITION; FILTER; WIND TUNNEL; WIND VELOCITY;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DRY DEPOSITION; FRISBEE SHAPED SURROGATE SURFACE; GAS; KNIFE EDGE SURROGATE SURFACE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; WIND TUNNEL MODEL;

EID: 79959509557     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: 18732844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Buehler S.S., Hites R.A. Peer reviewed: the great lakes' integrated atmospheric deposition network. Environmental Science & Technology 2002, 36:354A-359A.
2. Cussler E.L. Diffusion-mass Transfer in Fluid Systems 1997, The Press Sydicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, MA.
3. Davidson, C.I., McRae, G.J., Gamble, J.S., 1990. Detector for dry deposition of atmospheric contaminants having a coating capable of retaining contaminants, In: Patent, U.S. (Ed.).
4. Fialkowski M., Grzeszczak P., Nowakowski R., Holyst R. Absorption of mercury in gold films and its further desorption: quantitative morphological study of the surface patterns. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2004, 108:5026-5030.
5. Franz T.P., Eisenreich S.J., Holsen T.M. Dry deposition of particulate polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to Lake Michigan. Environmental Science & Technology 1998, 32:3681-3688.
6. Holsen T.M., Noll K.E., Liu S.P., Lee W.J. Dry deposition of polychlorinated biphenyls in urban areas. Environmental Science & Technology 1991, 25:1075-1081.
7. Keeler G.J., Dvonch J.T. Atmospheric mercury: a decade of observations in the great lakes. Dynamics of Mercury Pollution on Regional and Global Scales: Atmospheric Processes and Human Exposures Around the World 2005, 611-636. Springer Publishers, Norwell, MA. N. Pirrone, K.R. Mahaffey (Eds.).
8. Kuss J., Holzmann J.r., Ludwig R. An elemental mercury diffusion coefficient for natural waters determined by molecular dynamics simulation. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43:3183-3186.
9. Lai S.-O., Holsen T.M., Han Y.-J., Hopke P.P., Yi S.-M., Blanchard P., Pagano J.J., Milligan M. Estimation of mercury loadings to Lake Ontario: results from the Lake Ontario atmospheric deposition study (LOADS). Atmospheric Environment 2007, 41:8205-8218.
10. Lai S.-O., Huang J., Hopke P.K., Holsen T.M. An evaluation of direct measurement techniques for mercury dry deposition. Science of the Total Environment 2010, 409:1320-1327.
11. Landis M.S., Keeler G.J. Atmospheric mercury deposition to Lake Michigan during the lake Michigan mass balance study. Environmental Science & Technology 2002, 36:4518-4524.
12. Lin C.-J., Pehkonen S.O. The chemistry of atmospheric mercury: a review. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:2067-2079.
13. Lindberg S.E., Brooks S., Lin C.J., Scott K.J., Landis M.S., Stevens R.K., Goodsite M., Richter A. Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise. Environmental Science & Technology 2002, 36:1245-1256.
14. Liu Y. Analysis Method and Direct Measurement Technologies for Mercury Dry Deposition 2008, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Clarkson Univeristy, Potsdam.
15. Lyman S.N., Gustin M.S., Prestbo E.M., Marsik F.J. Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods. Environmental Science & Technology 2007, 41:1970-1976.
16. Lyman S.N., Gustin M.S., Prestbo E.M., Kilner P.I., Edgerton E., Hartsell B. Testing and application of surrogate surfaces for understanding potential gaseous oxidized mercury dry deposition. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43:6235-6241.
17. Marsik F.J., Keeler G.J., Landis M.S. The dry-deposition of speciated mercury to the Florida Everglades: measurements and modeling. Atmospheric Environment 2007, 41:136-149.
18. 2 near STP and the kinematic viscosity and thermal diffusivity of air near STP. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:453-457.
19. McCready D.I. Wind tunnel modeling of small particle deposition. Aerosol Science and Technology 1986, 5:301-312.
20. Noll E.K., Fang K.Y.P., Watkins L.A. Characterization of the deposition of particles from the atmosphere to a flat plate. Atmospheric Environment 1988, 22:1461-1468.
21. Poissant L., Pilote M., Constant P., Beauvais C., Zhang H.H., Xu X. Mercury gas exchanges over selected bare soil and flooded sites in the bay St. François wetlands (Québec, Canada). Atmospheric Environment 2004, 38:4205-4214.
22. Rolfhus K.R., Sakamoto H.E., Cleckner L.B., Stoor R.W., Babiarz C.L., Back R.C., Manolopoulos H., Hurley J.P. Distribution and fluxes of total and methylmercury in Lake Superior. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37:865-872.
23. Sakata M., Tani Y., Takagi T. Wet and dry deposition fluxes of trace elements in Tokyo Bay. Atmospheric Environment 2008, 42:5913-5922.
24. Schroeder W.H., Munthe J. Atmospheric mercury - an overview. Atmospheric Environment 1998, 32:809-822.
25. Shahin U., Yi S.-M., Paode R.D., Holsen T.M. Long-term elemental dry deposition fluxes measured around Lake Michigan with an automated dry deposition sampler. Environmental Science & Technology 2000, 34:1887-1892.
26. Slemr F., Brunke E.G., Ebinghaus R., Temme C., Munthe J., Wangberg I., Schroeder W., Steffen A., Berg T. Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1977. Geophysical Research Letters 2003, 30. Art. No. 1516.
27. Tekran Model 1130 Mercury Speciation Unit and Model 1135-p Particulate Mercury Unit 2001, Tekran, Toronto, Canada.
28. Wang Z., Pehkonen S.O.S.O. Oxidation of elemental mercury by aqueous bromine: atmospheric implications. Atmospheric Environment 2004, 38:3675-3688.
29. Welty J.R., Wicks C.E., Wilson R.E., Rorrer G. Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Hobeken, NJ.
30. Wu Y.-L., Davidson C.I., Dolske D.A., Sherwood S.I. Dry deposition of atmospheric contaminants: the relative importance of aerodynamic, boundary layer, and surface resistances. Aerosol Science and Technology 1992, 16:65-81.
31. Wu Y.-L., Davidson C.I., Russell A.G. Controlled wind tunnel experiments for particle bounceoff and resuspension. Aerosol Science and Technology 1992, 17:245-262.
32. Zufall M.J., Davidson C.I., Caffrey P.F., Ondov J.M. Airborne concentrations and dry deposition fluxes of particulate species to surrogate surfaces deployed in southern Lake Michigan. Environmental Science & Technology 1998, 32:1623-1628.