Diagnostic performance measures of ELISA and quantitative PCR tests for porcine circovirus type 2 exposure using Bayesian latent class analysis

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 101, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 79-88

  Haley, Charles ^a   Wagner, Bruce ^a   Puvanendiran, Sumathy ^b   Abrahante, Juan ^b   Murtaugh, Michael P ^b  

^a CENTERS FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND ANIMAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Conditional dependence; Latent data; Sensitivity; Specificity; Swine

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CIRCOVIRIDAE INFECTION; CIRCOVIRUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EVALUATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; SWINE; SWINE DISEASE; UNITED STATES; VIROLOGY;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CIRCOVIRIDAE INFECTIONS; CIRCOVIRUS; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; UNITED STATES;

CIRCOVIRUS; PORCINE CIRCOVIRUS; PORCINE CIRCOVIRUS 2; SUIDAE;

EID: 79959504325     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allan G.M., Ellis J.A. Porcine circoviruses: a review. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2000, 12:3-14.
2. Applied Biosystems, 2008. Real-Time PCR: Understanding CT. http://www3.appliedbiosystems.com/cms/groups/mcb_marketing/documents/generaldocuments/cms_053906.pdf.
3. Bouma A., Stegeman J.A., Engel B., de Kluijver E.P., Elbers A.R., De Jong M.C. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for the detection of classical swine fever in the field without a gold standard. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2001, 13:383-388.
4. Branscum A.J., Gardner I.A., Johnson W.O. Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 68:145-163.
5. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
6. Dohoo I., Martin W., Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research 2003, AVC Inc., Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
7. Enøe C., Georgiadis M., Johnson W.O. Estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when true disease state is unknown. Prev. Vet. Med. 2000, 45:61-81.
8. Finsterbusch T., Mankertz A. Porcine circoviruses - small but powerful. Virus Res. 2009, 143:177-183.
9. Gardner I.A., Stryhn H., Lind P., Collins M.T. Conditional dependence between tests affects the diagnosis and surveillance of animal diseases. Prev. Vet. Med. 2000, 45:107-122.
10. Gelman A., Rubin D.B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion). Stat. Sci. 1992, 7:457-511.
11. Georgiadis M.P., Johnson W.O., Gardner I.A., Singh R. Correlation-adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests. Appl. Stat. 2003, 52:63-76.
12. Grierson S.S., King D.P., Sandvik T., Hicks D., Spencer Y., Drew T.W., Banks M. Detection and genetic typing of type 2 porcine circoviruses in archived pig tissues from the UK. Arch. Virol. 2004, 149:1171-1183.
13. Haley C., Wagner B., Murtaugh M. Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of a new ELISA test for porcine circovirus 2 exposure using a study pseudo gold standard and latent-class analysis. 40th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians Conference Proc. 2009.
14. Hanson T., Johnson W.O., Gardner I.A. Hierarchical models for estimating herd prevalence and test accuracy in the absence of a gold-standard. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2003, 8:223-239.
15. Harding J.C. The clinical expression and emergence of porcine circovirus 2. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 98:131-135.
16. Hines R.K., Lukert D. Porcine circovirus: a serological survey of swine in the United States. Swine Health Prod. 1995, 3:71-73.
17. Hurnik D., Dohoo I.R., Donald A., Robinson N.P. Factor analysis of swine farm management practices on Prince Edward Island. Prev. Vet. Med. 1994, 20:135-146.
18. McIntosh K.A., Tumber A., Harding J.C., Ellis J.A., Hill J.E. Development and validation of a SYBR green real-time PCR for the quantification of porcine circovirus type 2 in serum, buffy coat, feces, and multiple tissues. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 133:23-33.
19. Nérette P., Stryhn H., Dohoo I., Hammell L. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 85:207-225.
20. Olvera A., Sibila M., Calsamiglia M., Segalés J., Domingo M. Comparison of porcine circovirus type 2 load in serum quantified by a real time PCR in postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome and porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome naturally affected pigs. J. Virol. Methods 2004, 117:75-80.
21. Opriessnig T., Meng J.X., Halbur P.G. Porcine circovirus type 2 associated disease: update on current terminology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and intervention strategies. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2007, 19:591-615.
22. Puvanendiran S., Stone S., Yu W., Johnson C., Abrahante J., Jimenez L., Griggs T., Haley C., Wagner B., Murtaugh M. Absence of porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV1) and high prevalence of PCV 2 exposure and infection in swine finisher herds. Virus Res. 2011, 157(1):92-98.
23. Saah A.J., Hoover D.R. " Sensitivity" and " specificity" reconsidered: the meaning of these terms in analytical and diagnostic settings. Ann. Intern. Med. 1997, 126:91-94.
24. Segalés J., Calsamiglia M., Olvera A., Sibila M., Badiella L., Domingo M. Quantification of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) DNA in serum and tonsillar, nasal, tracheo-bronchial, urinary and faecal swabs of pigs with and without postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 111:223-229.
25. Tischer I., Gelderblom H., Vettermann W., Koch M.A. A very small porcine virus with circular single-stranded DNA. Nature 1982, 295:64-66.
26. Toft N., Jorgensen E., Hojsgaard S. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard. Prev. Vet. Med. 2005, 68:19-33.
27. Turner M.J., Medley G.F., Woodbine K.A., Slevin J.A., Green L.E. The relationship between porcine circovirus 2 antigen score and antibody titre and histology of lymph nodes in 375 euthanased sick and healthy pigs from 113 British pig farms with and without postweaning. Multisystemic wasting syndrome. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009, 88:213-219.
28. USDA Swine 2006, Part II: Reference of Swine Health and Health Management Practices in the United States 2007, USDA-APHIS-VS-CEAH, Fort Collins, CO.
29. Vincent I.E., Carrasco C.P., Herrmann B., Meehan B.M., Allan G.M., Summerfield A., McCullough K.C. Dendritic cells harbor infectious porcine circovirus type 2 in the absence of apparent cell modulation or replication of the virus. J. Virol. 2003, 77:13288-13300. 2003.