Should we assess climate model predictions in light of severe tests?

Eos

Volumn 92, Issue 23, 2011, Pages 195-

  Katzav, Joel ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELING; CLIMATE PREDICTION; GRAVITY FIELD; METHODOLOGY; SEVERE WEATHER; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 79959502357     PISSN: 00963941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2011EO230004     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. Frame, D. J., N. E. Faull, M. M. Joshi, and M. R. Allen (2007), Probabilistic climate forecasts and inductive problems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A., 365(1857), 1971-1992, doi:10.1098/ rsta.2007.2069.
2. Hegerl, G. C., T. J. Crowley, W. T. Hyde, and D. J. Frame (2006), Climate sensitivity constrained by temperature reconstructions over the past seven centuries, Nature, 440, 1029-1032, doi:10.1038/ nature04679.
3. Popper, K. R. (2002), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge, London.
4. Popper, K. R. (2005), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, London.
5. Randall, D. A., et al. (2007), Climate models and their evaluation, in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis̈Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon et al., chap. 8, pp. 589-662, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
6. Solomon, S., et al. (2007), Technical summary, in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis̈Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon et al., pp. 19-91, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.