Prostate cancer guidelines on Web 2.0-based sites: The screening dilemma continues online

Journal of Cancer Education

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 188-193

  Friedman, Daniela B ^a   Koskan, Alexis ^a   Rose, India D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Health communication; Prostate cancer; Screening; Social media; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTATE TUMOR; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79959496254     PISSN: 08858195     EISSN: 15430154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13187-010-0180-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer Facts and Figures 2009. Atlanta, GA
2. American Cancer Society (2009) Cancer Facts and Figures for African Americans 2009-2010. Atlanta, GA
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008) Screening for PrCA: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149(3):185-191
4. Barry MJ (2009) Screening for PrCA - the controversy that refuses to die. N Engl J Med 360(13):1351-1354
5. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW (2009) Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 59(1):27-41
6. American Cancer Society (2009) Detailed guide: can PrCA be found early? http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI-2-4-3X-Can-prostate-cancer-be- found-early-36.asp?rnav=cri. Accessed 1 Apr 2009
7. Fox S (2006) Online health search 2006. Pew Internet and American life project, Washington, DC
8. Bright MA, Fleisher L, Thomsen C, Morra ME, Marcus A, Gehring W (2005) Exploring e-Health usage and interest among cancer information service users: the need for personalized interactions and multiple channels remains. J Health Commun 10(Suppl 1):35-52 (Pubitemid 43041757)
9. Boulos MN, Wheeler S (2007) The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Inf Libr J 24(1):2-23
10. Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S (2006) Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med Educ 6:41
11. Rainie L (2007) 28% of online Americans have used the internet to tag content. Pew Internet and American life project, Washington, DC
12. Skiba DJ (2005) Web 2.0: next great thing or just marketing hype? Nurs Educ Perspect 26(2):212-214
13. Seeman N (2008) Web 2.0 and chronic illness: new horizons, new opportunities. Healthc Q 11(1):104-108, 110
14. Tanner A, Friedman DB, Koskan A, Barr D (2009) Disaster communication on the Internet: a focus on mobilizing information. J Health Commun 14(8):741-755
15. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L, Arocha JF (2006) Health literacy and the World Wide Web: comparing the readability of leading incident cancers on the Internet. Med Inform Internet Med 31(1):67-87
16. Friedman DB, Kao EK (2008) A comprehensive assessment of the difficulty level and cultural sensitivity of online cancer prevention resources for older minority men. Prev Chronic Dis 5(1): Epub
17. Mathews AE, Laditka SB, Laditka JN, Friedman DB (2009) What are the top-circulating magazines in the United States telling older adults about cognitive health? Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 24(4):302-312
18. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
19. Ostry A, Young ML, Hughes M (2008) The quality of nutritional information available on popular Websites: a content analysis. Health Educ Res 23(4):648-655 (Pubitemid 351989708)
20. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L (2003) Cancer coverage in North American publications targeting seniors. J Cancer Educ 18(1):43-47 (Pubitemid 36638034)
21. Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L, Arocha JF (2004) Readability of cancer information on the internet. J Cancer Educ 19(2):117-122 (Pubitemid 39167333)
22. Campo S, Mastin T (2007) Placing the burden on the individual: overweight and obesity in African American and mainstream women's magazines. Health Commun 22(3):229-240
23. Friedman DB, Corwin SJ, Dominick G, Rose ID (2009) African American men's understanding and perceptions about PrCA: Why multiple dimensions of health literacy are important in cancer communication. J Community Health 34(5):449-460
24. Friedman DB, Corwin SJ, Rose ID, Dominick GM (2009) PrCA communication strategies recommended by older African American men in South Carolina: a qualitative analysis. J Cancer Educ 24(3):204-209
25. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE (2009) The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health 30:273-292