An approach to adapt service requests to actual service interfaces

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-8

  Cavallaro, Luca ^a   Di Nitto, Elisabetta ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Service adaptation; Service composition; Service interoperability; Service Oriented architectures

Indexed keywords

DESIGN TIME; DYNAMIC BINDING; MAPPING FUNCTIONS; OPEN WORLD; RUNTIMES; SELF-ADAPTIVE; SERVICE ADAPTATION; SERVICE COMPOSITION; SERVICE COMPOSITIONS; SERVICE INTERFACES; SERVICE INTEROPERABILITY; SERVICE ORIENTED; SERVICE REQUESTERS; SERVICE REQUESTS; SERVICE SELECTION;

ABSTRACTING; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTEROPERABILITY; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA);

EID: 79959463078     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Drools, an enhanced rules engine implementation. http://labs.jboss.com/ drools/.
2. Ws-bpel specification, http://www.oasisopen.org/committees/tchome.php? wgabbrev=wsbpel.
3. Secse: Service centric system engineering. http://secse.eng.it/pls/secse/ secse.home, 2004-2008.
4. D. Ardagna, M. Comuzzi, E. Mussi, B. Pernici, and P. Plebani. Paws: A framework for executing adaptive web-service processes. IEEE Software, 24(6): 39-46, 2007. (Pubitemid 350153712)
5. L. Baresi, E. Di Nitto, and C. Ghezzi. Towards open-world software: Issue and challenges. In SEW, pages 249-252, 2006.
6. B. Benatallah, F. Casati, D. Grigori, H. R. M. Nezhad, and F. Toumani. Developing adapters for web services integration. In CAiSE, pages 415-429, 2005.
7. A. Bracciali, A. Brogi, and C. Canal. A formal approach to component adaptation. Journal of Systems and Software, 74(1): 45-54, 2005.
8. E. Cimpian and A. Mocan. Wsmx process mediation based on choreographies. In Business Process Management Workshops, pages 130-143, 2005.
9. M. Colombo, E. Di Nitto, and M. Mauri. Scene: A service composition execution environment supporting dynamic changes disciplined through rules. In ICSOC, pages 191-202, 2006.
10. G. Denaro, M. Pezzè, and D. Tosi. Designing self-adaptive service-oriented applications. In ICAC, page 16, 2007.
11. G. Denaro, M. Pezzé, D. Tosi, and D. Schilling. Towards self-adaptive service-oriented architectures. In TAV-WEB '06: Proc. of the 2006 workshop on Testing, analysis, and verification of web services and applications, pages 10-16, 2006.
12. M. Di Penta, R. Esposito, M. L. Villani, R. Codato, M. Colombo, and E. Di Nitto. Ws binder: a framework to enable dynamic binding of composite web services. In SOSE '06: Proc. of the 2006 international workshop on Service-oriented software engineering, pages 74-80, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
13. M. Dumas, M. Spork, and K. W. 0002. Adapt or perish: Algebra and visual notation for service interface adaptation. In Business Process Management, pages 65-80, 2006.
14. X. Li, Y. Fan, and F. Jiang. A classification of service composition mismatches to support service mediation. In GCC '07: Proc. of the Sixth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing (GCC 2007), pages 315-321, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.
15. H. R. M. Nezhad, B. Benatallah, A. Martens, F. Curbera, and F. Casati. Semi-automated adaptation of service interactions. In WWW '07: Proc. of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 993-1002, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press.
16. H. R. M. Nezhad, R. Saint-Paul, B. Benatallah, F. Casati, J. Ponge, and F. Toumani. Servicemosaic: Interactive analysis and manipulation of service conversations. In ICDE, pages 1497-1498, 2007. (Pubitemid 47422196)