Modeling symmetric Macromolecular structures in Rosetta3

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  DiMaio, Frank ^a   Leaver Fay, Andrew ^b   Bradley, Phil ^c   Baker, David ^a   André, Ingemar ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYMMETRIC MACROMOLECULAR MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MACROMOLECULE; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

PROTEIN;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 79959458821     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020450     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. André I, Bradley P, Wang C, Baker D, (2007) Prediction of the structure of symmetrical protein assemblies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104: 17656-17661.
2. Bradley P, Baker D, (2006) Improved beta-protein structure prediction by multilevel optimization of nonlocal strand pairings and local backbone conformation. Proteins 65: 922-929.
3. Wang C, Bradley P, Baker D, (2007) Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J Mol Biol 272: 503-519.
4. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, et al. (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487: 545-574.
5. Ponder JW, Richards FM, (1987) Tertiary templates for proteins: Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 193: 775-791.
6. Pierce NA, Winfree E, (2002) Protein Design is NP-hard. Protein Eng 15: 779-782.
7. Kuhlman B, Baker D, (2000) Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 97: 10383-10388.
8. Leaver-Fay, Kuhlman B, Snoeyink J, (2005) Rotamer-Pair Energy Calculations Using a Trie Data Structure. In: Casadio R, Myers G, editors. Algorithms in Bioinformatics Berlin Springer pp. 389-400.
9. Abe H, Braun W, Noguti T, Go N, (1984) Rapid calculation of 1st and 2nd derivatives of conformational energy with respect to dihedral angles for proteins- General recurrent equations. Computers & Chemistry 8: 239-247.
10. Das R, André I, Shen Y, Wu Y, Lemak A, et al. (2009) Simultaneous prediction of protein folding and docking at high resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106: 18978-18983.
11. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K, (1995) A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 23: ii-v.
12. Sgourakis NG, Lange OF, DiMaio F, André I, et al. (2011) Determination of the structures of symmetric protein oligomers from NMR chemical shifts and residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 133: 6288-6298.